Yes, Mingus Quintet. That time it was fully ceramic version. C90 + C25Which one ? That is the CELL series tweeter and mid
Yes. There was a time...4th order 2kHz XO
VOLYA.AUDIO - high-end sound systems
In these loudspeakers I chose 2.5kHz/4th
2.5kH is also fine - I know I love the C25 tweeter, I have not heard the T25B-6 and the cost roughly the same ... the Be has better 25kHz+ response which affect the IMD. One can ofc test a 4th order passband on the C25 to tame the cone breakup at 35kH...
I think want to build with the C25 and C90 together with SBA TX woofers, I believe in that... hopefully independent reviews of the TX woofers support my hopes of high transient woofers.
I think want to build with the C25 and C90 together with SBA TX woofers, I believe in that... hopefully independent reviews of the TX woofers support my hopes of high transient woofers.
Oh and by the way, how the heck does Tidal/Vimberg and Marten connect 3 woofers, anything but parallel and series gives awful power distribution.
See link
Speaker Parallel Serial Connection Calculator - Electronics Projects Circuits
See link
Speaker Parallel Serial Connection Calculator - Electronics Projects Circuits
Tidal Vimberg. Three woofers are in parallel connection. Possibly, one of the worst bass I ever heard...
TONDA – Vimberg
Accuton AS190-9-251-FG | HiFiCompass
Last edited:
The 5" TX midrange was announced.
5″ SATORI MW13TX-8 / TeXtreme – Sbacoustics
5″ SATORI MW13TX-4 / TeXtreme – Sbacoustics
5″ SATORI MW13TX-8 / TeXtreme – Sbacoustics
5″ SATORI MW13TX-4 / TeXtreme – Sbacoustics
I noticed something interesting.
5” SB15CAC30-8 - Mms 10.7 g - Cms 1.88 mm/N - Magnetic flux density 1.0 T - Magnet weight 0.54 kg
5″ SATORI MW13TX-8 - Mms 7.3 g - Cms 2.19 mm/N - Magnetic flux density 1.08 T - Magnet weight 0.1 kg
I am working on my transient perfect loudspeaker .... so, yeah...
5” SB15CAC30-8 - Mms 10.7 g - Cms 1.88 mm/N - Magnetic flux density 1.0 T - Magnet weight 0.54 kg
5″ SATORI MW13TX-8 - Mms 7.3 g - Cms 2.19 mm/N - Magnetic flux density 1.08 T - Magnet weight 0.1 kg
I am working on my transient perfect loudspeaker .... so, yeah...
Member
Joined 2003
You forgot an important component of that comparison, as those are not in fact the same size driver.
SB15CAC30-8 (150mm) - Sd 82cm^2
MW13TX-8 (130mm) - Sd 70cm^2
The comparison would be that SB15CAC is 117% of the surface area, and 146% the moving mass. What effect on transient response? None at all, only sensitivity is affected. For an idea of transient response you need to look no further than the frequency response of the driver, the new Satori TX look quite good in this regard.
SB15CAC30-8 (150mm) - Sd 82cm^2
MW13TX-8 (130mm) - Sd 70cm^2
The comparison would be that SB15CAC is 117% of the surface area, and 146% the moving mass. What effect on transient response? None at all, only sensitivity is affected. For an idea of transient response you need to look no further than the frequency response of the driver, the new Satori TX look quite good in this regard.
CAC = 0,13g/cm^2
TX = 0,10g/cm^2 ... so per any given Sd, the TeXtreme is ligher
The TX is more refined in that it behaves better (more linear), has a more gentle cone breakup and further up in frequency and higher sensitivity. So, the TX should sound cleaner than the CAC. But we don't know the harmonic content of the TX material yet.
TX = 0,10g/cm^2 ... so per any given Sd, the TeXtreme is ligher
The TX is more refined in that it behaves better (more linear), has a more gentle cone breakup and further up in frequency and higher sensitivity. So, the TX should sound cleaner than the CAC. But we don't know the harmonic content of the TX material yet.