Visaton W200S + TW70

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I seem to recall that Basildon, Essex is the most typical English Constituency. Whatever Basildon thinks is what the Country thinks. :D
:D Didn't realise this

All deeply confusing. We just retire to good music played on decent speakers.
Totally agree with you:)

So this Seas Woofer is better option than W 200 S with the same crossover?
 
You really don't know till you try it.

This is a bit of a classic three-way: SEAS-3-Way-Classic

Everything about a 3-way is better than two-way IMO. Goes loud without distortion. The small mid has better dispersion.

Troels Gravesen worried about bass cone breakup in his 3-way. For sure, a polycone has less breakup than a paper cone.
Seas P21RE/P H0942-08 Woofer. H0313 2015 remake

3-ways have an unexciting sound. Perhaps because they have less distortion than a 2-way. They sound quiet, which encourages you to turn them up loud...:eek:

I really don't think choice of bass drivers is all that important in a 3-way. Everything is in it's comfort zone and works well.
 
I suppose that with prior planning, we could build a decent two-way and later convert to a three-way. :)

Such is the old SEAS kit Njord:

540663d1459296030-seas-kits-seas-njord-jpg


540664d1459296030-seas-kits-seas-njord-filter-png


IMO, not the greatest design ever, but probably does a few good things. Modern drivers are probably the bass SEAS CA22RNX and a 27TFFC tweeter.

Later add a mid and a decent crossover. Voila, SEAS-3-Way-Classic

Remember the 6 P's. Prior planning prevents "**** Pauvre" performance. :D
 
Mission completed.They sound beautiful....at least to me:D Thanks a lot for the help Steve:cheers:
 

Attachments

  • cross1.jpg
    cross1.jpg
    838.6 KB · Views: 374
  • cross2.jpg
    cross2.jpg
    580.8 KB · Views: 350
  • crossover3.jpg
    crossover3.jpg
    871.5 KB · Views: 337
  • sp1.jpg
    sp1.jpg
    372.3 KB · Views: 204
  • sp2.jpg
    sp2.jpg
    474.4 KB · Views: 433
Last edited:
Congratulations, that is a buatifully looking veneered cabinet. I suppose you are fine with it although could be worth a try to modify the 1.5 mH inductor (0.6mm wire=1.9 Rdc) with a 1 mm wire version. According to Visaton, difference in Rdc between the two is 1.3R.

edit: How is the final circuit now?
 
Congratulations, that is a buatifully looking veneered cabinet. I suppose you are fine with it although could be worth a try to modify the 1.5 mH inductor (0.6mm wire=1.9 Rdc) with a 1 mm wire version. According to Visaton, difference in Rdc between the two is 1.3R.

edit: How is the final circuit now?

Yeah, as I said before I'm totally new in this. I didn't realise there is a different thickness wire. I guess less resistance is better in this case? Is it going to be noticeable if I do the change?

Very nicely done! I'm sure it sounds fantastic.
Thanks:)
 
Is it going to be noticeable if I do the change?


I'm going to take a crack at this.


With the 0.6 mm inductor:
Power going to the driver is down 1.6 dB. You won't hear this, but it means that a lot more power is dissipated by the inductor. For an average power of 15 W into the speaker, 4.8 W is dissipated in the inductor.


With the 1 mm inductor:
Power going to the driver is down 0.6 dB. The power dissipated in the inductor is a much smaller percentage of the power going to the speaker. For an average input of 15 W, only 1.9 W is dissipated in the inductor.


Furthermore, you will be able to drive more power into the speaker with the 1 mm inductor (I think by about 22 %).


As far as sensitivity is concerned, sensitivity is 2.2 dB less with the 0.6 mm inductor. Using the theoretical 88 dB for the driver at 1 W, at 2.83 V, the sensitivity is as follows:
0.6 mm: 87.6 dB
1 mm: 89.8 dB


You will need to adjust the tweeter accordingly, but again, with the 1 mm inductor, you will use a smaller value resistor on the tweeter and therefore dissipate less power in that.


I hope I'm accurate...
 
I'm going to take a crack at this.


With the 0.6 mm inductor:
Power going to the driver is down 1.6 dB. You won't hear this, but it means that a lot more power is dissipated by the inductor. For an average power of 15 W into the speaker, 4.8 W is dissipated in the inductor.


With the 1 mm inductor:
Power going to the driver is down 0.6 dB. The power dissipated in the inductor is a much smaller percentage of the power going to the speaker. For an average input of 15 W, only 1.9 W is dissipated in the inductor.


Furthermore, you will be able to drive more power into the speaker with the 1 mm inductor (I think by about 22 %).


As far as sensitivity is concerned, sensitivity is 2.2 dB less with the 0.6 mm inductor. Using the theoretical 88 dB for the driver at 1 W, at 2.83 V, the sensitivity is as follows:
0.6 mm: 87.6 dB
1 mm: 89.8 dB


You will need to adjust the tweeter accordingly, but again, with the 1 mm inductor, you will use a smaller value resistor on the tweeter and therefore dissipate less power in that.


I hope I'm accurate...

I think I should just add that I don't think it matters at all. 15 W average power is something massive, probably in the region of 200 W peak power. According to this thread it looks like most people are happy with an average of only a few watts.

It should be an obvious improvement for the better. Perhaps you can source magnet wire somewhere cheaply and build the inductors yourself. Would be a great exercise though.

Thanks a lot for the info guys! To be honest I didn't expect much when I start building them,but they they turn out good at least the cabinets.And with some corrections they sound good as well.Probably I will change the inductors and see if I can hear the difference :)
 

Attachments

  • skretnica_final.jpg.9398234c1a21019c5022c54d56cbcd31.jpg
    skretnica_final.jpg.9398234c1a21019c5022c54d56cbcd31.jpg
    15.1 KB · Views: 1,702
  • PSX_20191104_010639.jpg.26153a6ab973f44b36040c6daba2fab8.jpg
    PSX_20191104_010639.jpg.26153a6ab973f44b36040c6daba2fab8.jpg
    40.2 KB · Views: 1,455
  • PSX_20191104_010757.jpg.82e85a5ae67931c77183105b37a9287d.jpg
    PSX_20191104_010757.jpg.82e85a5ae67931c77183105b37a9287d.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 897
Great work, acamilicko! :D

When I first saw the WLM La Scala, I just wondered how those guys were charging 3,000 Euros for something with a ten buck tweeter! :D

655883d1515564309-visaton-w200s-tw70-wlm-la-scala-jpg


Actually, they reminded me of my first serious £35 speakers back in 1972, the Wharfedale Linton II's:

681184d1526561181-70th-anniversary-loudspeakers-briggs-wharfedale-linton-jpg


I have tried the Visaton TW70 and the similar Monacor HT-22 tweeters. TBH, I prefer the Monacor:

687319d1529236762-6-8-woofer-system7-wlm-la-scala-clone-jpg


715078d1542007725-restoring-monitor-audio-r300-bookshelf-speakers-monitor-audio-monacor-ht-22-cone-tweeter-jpg


I haven't taken the Monacor apart, but I suspect it doesn't have a spider, The Visaton tweeter does. I only know this because I put a screwdriver through the Visaton tweeter cone one day, by accident! :eek:
 
Last edited:
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.