3-way asymetrical parallel and series crossover

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is this the correct wiring of a 3-way asymmetrical parallel and series crossover? I.e. should the inductor for the LF (series) woofer be on positive side (before element) or negative side (after)?

The HF tweeter and MF midwoofer are in parallel (with tweeter polarity reversed to keep in phase). The HF has a second order crossover around 2400 Hz.

The MF has a first order crossover (one coil plus a Zobel filter).

The MF and the LF are in series with negative terminal of MF woofer connected to positive terminal of the LF woofer.

The LF woofer has a first order crossover (one coil). Assume the two coil values will be summed for LF woofer if the shown series woofer schematic is possible.
 

Attachments

  • 3-way asymmetrical parallel and series crossover.jpg
    3-way asymmetrical parallel and series crossover.jpg
    104 KB · Views: 248
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I would keep everything in parallel configuration, as it seems that series connection is not well understood ...
The MF -the midrange, I suppose- hasn't any high pass before it, so it will receive the same amount of bass delivered to the LF. But not in this special case. Hazardous material in there !
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Thanks for the prompt reply.

How do I know if the AKSA amp can handle the lower overall impedance?

Have been running speakers as 2-way until now.
 

Attachments

  • Focal tower addition.jpg
    Focal tower addition.jpg
    95.5 KB · Views: 159
  • Redback LF woofer crossover.jpg
    Redback LF woofer crossover.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 152
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
So those are the existing speakers, being the LF a side mounted bass enhancer which is mildly filtered by the 8 mH inductor ?
A way to test the amplifier's ability to drive low loads is to put your hand on the heatsinks!
If they get too hot at low-medium power it means that the power devices cannot withstand the high current for long periods .
With 8 Ω speakers it's not the case, they're ok for every amplifier.
Yes, the crossover has to be designed in order to predict if there are any impedance falls in any band, because of the reactive behavior of driver together with the passive components.
 
Eliminating all the extra networks, a 1st order series XO is very easy, as the parallel type;
the drivers must be in series and the inductor and capacitor are in parallel to each driver; the driver itself exhibits an inductance ( it has a coil ) and influences the parameters of the network. So the paths of the currents are determined by the ability of the passive components to transfer only treble ( caps) or bass ( coils).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Hi,

The schematic is wrong.

For series with with no high pass on the mid you put
a capacitor across the bass unit for an unusual 2.5 way.
The two units wired in series.

Parallel with the inductor in series with the bass is a standard 2.5way.

They will sound very different, the latter a lot more bass.

rgds, sreten.
 
So if just doing 2.5-way parallel XOver instead, will the tweeter still be inverted polarity?

Schematic changed to parallel in first attached drawing.

Plus an example of what I assume the serial schematic should be like?
 

Attachments

  • 3-way asymmetrical parallel crossover.jpg
    3-way asymmetrical parallel crossover.jpg
    130.6 KB · Views: 204
  • Series filter 2s LCAudio.gif
    Series filter 2s LCAudio.gif
    25.6 KB · Views: 655
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.