Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

WWMMTMMWW drivers surrounding the T
WWMMTMMWW drivers surrounding the T
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th December 2008, 04:04 PM   #1
crazyhub is offline crazyhub  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: alsace
Default WWMMTMMWW drivers surrounding the T

Hi all,

assuming an on-axis (stereo) listening, pros and cons, notably lobing issues?

Thanks
An externally hosted image should be here but it no longer works. Please upload images instead of linking to them to prevent this.

An externally hosted image should be here but it no longer works. Please upload images instead of linking to them to prevent this.
__________________
crazyhub
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2008, 09:25 PM   #2
Jay_WJ is offline Jay_WJ  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indiana
Even if you listen on axis, you need to consider the speaker's power response and resulting room interaction. Assuming that side walls are easier to treat acoustically and you don't expect a wide vertical listening window, a vertical WMTMW array will be a better option.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2008, 10:09 PM   #3
LineSource is offline LineSource  United States
diyAudio Member
 
LineSource's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SiliconValley
A WMTMW will sound better as it better approximates a point source and has modest baffle ripples. That's why the industry experts design them.

For a happy life, build speakers your wife and teens will want to show off to their friends, both for cool sound and cool looks.

W= Lambda TD15S in ported box
M =Lambda TD 6.5 new 6.5" speaker in sealed box
T= RAAL or NeoPro5 ribbon

LR4 xovers at 100 and 2.5K

Should be flat from 25Hz-25Khz at 96db/watt with 2db baffle step compensation
Attached Images
File Type: jpg hyperion.jpg (36.7 KB, 782 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2008, 02:07 PM   #4
crazyhub is offline crazyhub  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: alsace
OK gents,

I posted a simplified image of what I was thinking on this matter, thus only 4 W and 4 M per speaker.
But if I decide to go with i.e. 8 W, 4 M and maybe 1, 2 or even 4 T I'll not be able to place all these drivers vertically with the T(s) centered at ears height; thus the idea to place all the drivers on circles surrounding one or more T placed at ears height.

My question is: does such a configuration affect the stereo image and sound stages in a stereo listening?
__________________
crazyhub
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2008, 02:25 PM   #5
Pan is offline Pan  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Without doubt crazyhub's layout aproximate a point source much closer than a WMTMW layout.

Not that a point source necessarily is something to strive for though.

Crazyhub, can you tell more about your idea such as driver size, open baffle or boxed. Free standing or close to wall, maybe in wall and so on.



/Peter
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2008, 04:00 PM   #6
BlueWizard is offline BlueWizard  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
I think Pan has the right idea, what size drivers are you considering? That is, the rated size and the outside dimension.

Are we looking at 15" woofers with 6" midbass speakers, or are we looking at 6" woofers with 2" or 3" dome midrange? Or perhaps, 3" or 4" cone midrange?

While my level of knowledge only allows me to speak at the conceptual stage, I wonder why a square cluster of midrange and not a vertical array?

Also, could you make a tighter cluster of midrange by putting the tweeter above the cluster and moving the midrange closer together? That would make the midrange more of a points source of sound. I think if you calculate the distance between centers on the midrange, that should help you determine at what frequency problems are likely to occur. If you crossovers keep you out of or away from the problem frequency, it should work OK.

Though I realize that you've presented only a rough sketch, I would think a tighter cluster all around would be better. Move the Woofers closer together (side-to-side), make the midrange cluster tighter, and place the tweeter above the mid-cluster.

Just a few thoughts.

steve/bluewizard
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2008, 04:51 PM   #8
badman is offline badman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
badman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ashland, MA
Default Re: WWMMTMMWW drivers surrounding the T

Quote:
Originally posted by crazyhub
Hi all,

assuming an on-axis (stereo) listening, pros and cons, notably lobing issues?

Thanks
An externally hosted image should be here but it no longer works. Please upload images instead of linking to them to prevent this.

An externally hosted image should be here but it no longer works. Please upload images instead of linking to them to prevent this.

Shift the drivers around a bit to reduce the driver symmetry and vary the CTC spacing. Lobing will be an issue with this many drivers in a design no matter what. Do you REALLY need that much displacement?
__________________
"The dawn of Bose created the "Man Cave" and reduced testoterone levels worldwide by 18.5 per cent" Peteleoni
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2008, 08:42 PM   #9
crazyhub is offline crazyhub  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: alsace
Thanks guys for your inputs and links.

I should have named this thread "circle array"...
I opened it only in a theorical perspective.
I have now a good idea of how I should have asked using a simplier example:

Don't take into consideration baffle step losses or any diffraction issues.

Assuming a circle of say six 5" midwoofers surrounding one tweeter; the tweeter is at ears height.
Suppose the frames and placement of these drivers give the following building possibility: the distance from the tweeter center to each midwoofer center allows to avoid (or at least strongly minimize) any lobing problems at x-over frequency; at this point I don't see any occuring problem, notably because distance of each of the midwoofers to my ear is strictly equal, OK?

Now I decide to go to a 3-way set-up making a highpass filter for the mids and place say eight 10" woofers on a circle surounding the 6 mids. As previously stated, suppose that the distance from each woofer center to its mid neighbor center permits to avoid or minimize lobing problems at x-over frequency.
Here I guess this set-up should work even more properly than a vertically centered line array notably because the distance between EACH woofer to EACH mid is minimized, no?
__________________
crazyhub
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2008, 01:36 AM   #10
Rybaudio is offline Rybaudio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Minnetonka, MN
Send a message via AIM to Rybaudio Send a message via MSN to Rybaudio
In an array like that the acoustic centers of the three sections coincide... there will not be "lobing" at the crossover from the center to center offset. Each of the sections will however have narrowing directivity at HF as they are flat radiators. You will have to choose crossover points accordingly to avoid holes in the off-axis and power responses.

For example, if you had six 5" mids surrounding a tweeter, that would have the directivity of a 15" or 18" woofer, meaning you would have to cross below 1k to avoid a hole off-axis (and be very output limited) or if you crossed at a comfortable point for the tweet you'd have a 1-2 octave hole off-axis and in the power response.

As that example hopefully illustrates, you'll have to use smaller midranges that what you normally would in order to make this work. In the end, if you demand reasonably behaved directivity you end up with about the same midrange surface area as a similarly performing MT. There are some advantages though. The array smaller drivers avoids the lobing at the crossover because the acoustic centers coincide. The four smaller drivers will probably be a little more efficient than one big one, and may have more thermal mass in the voice coils resulting in lower power compression. The downside is cost... the array will probably cost more.

When I was looking at this I was considering doing a 3/4" or 1" dome tweeter surrounded by four 2" dome mids (Daytons). Four of the 2" dome mids would be 96 dB 1w/1m, have four 2" voice coils to dissipate heat, and would be very clean through the region I'd be using them. The downside is that they had big motors so I could not space them, even after trimming the faceplates, tight enough to push the crossover high enough. For the time being I abandoned the idea (I use a waveguide+cd), but I might have to look into it again.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


WWMMTMMWW drivers surrounding the THide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JBL comp drivers, Dayton Reference Sub drivers for auction NO RESERVE pkpickard Swap Meet 1 21st January 2009 03:19 AM
FS: x25 Vifa 5" Drivers + x2 Diamond Audio 5.6 Hex Eton Drivers omarmipi Swap Meet 0 19th November 2007 04:21 AM
21" Bass Drivers and Beyma Compression Drivers Magnetar Swap Meet 0 19th November 2006 02:42 AM
Open-Baffle dipoles...a heresy to pair PA drivers w/ home drivers? thadman Multi-Way 7 11th November 2006 09:11 PM
FS: horn subs, drivers, 'regular' subwoofer drivers John Sheerin Swap Meet 0 1st August 2004 11:33 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 14.29%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio
Wiki