Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

DIfferences in ways of measuring Thiel/Small parameters
DIfferences in ways of measuring Thiel/Small parameters
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th November 2007, 04:45 PM   #1
davidallancole is offline davidallancole  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Default DIfferences in ways of measuring Thiel/Small parameters

Hello,

I have read a few different ways of measuring Thiel/Small parameters. In Rod Elliotts article he uses a 10 ohm resistor in series with the speaker. I think it was in Vance Dickasons book, Vance used a 10k ohm resistor and I have seen on the epanorama website a 1k ohm resistor.

My question is, is any one way more accurate or better?

Rod Elliotts method requires a power amp in the chain to get the voltage levels right, but it seems with Vances method you could use the output of you sound card on a computer to measure it.

Thanks.

Here Rods way: http://sound.westhost.com/tsp.htm
Epanorama: http://www.epanorama.net/documents/a...arameters.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 06:23 PM   #2
Jack Hidley is offline Jack Hidley  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Jack Hidley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Danville, CA
DIfferences in ways of measuring Thiel/Small parameters
David,

There are two important things to remember when measuring TSPs.

One is that you must be measuring the actual impedance of the driver. The first method you posted measures the actual impedance. The second method only measures an estimate of it. Note where the writer says that this method forms a decent current source? An ideal current source has an infinite output impedance. His current source uses a 1k output impedance. This could cause a 10% error in Q measurements with a high BL driver. The only reason to use it, is that it makes the math slightly easier. Use the first method with whatever resistor value you want to.

Two is drive level. The TS model assumes that the driver being modeled is linear. They are not. Changing the drive level will therefore affect the measurements. What drive level should you use to take the measurements? That depends mostly on the drivers Xmax. We usually shoot for an excursion at Fs of about 0.2Xmax. That keeps the driver in its mostly linear range, but keeps it out of the low level noise and hysteresis. How much voltage or current does this correspond to? That completely depends on the output resistor you use, the drivers Qes, Qms, Mms and Xmax. Each driver will be different.
__________________
Jack Hidley
ACS
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 06:46 PM   #3
davidallancole is offline davidallancole  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Thanks for the reply Jack.

Is there any benefit then to using a constant current source to do these measurements instead of the resistor method?

Is there a calculation to figure out how much current or voltage is required to hit the 0.2 Xmax at Fs? Does this require knowing the BL of the speaker? This all sounds a little more complicated than I thought.

I will follow Rod Elliotts proposed method then to do my speaker measurements.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2007, 01:19 AM   #4
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
The way to measure is the way closer to normal operation signal levels since that is the final operating mode. So Jacks 0.2 xmax seems a good point to select.

The constant current method may have some problems when using ferro fluid cooling.
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2007, 02:19 AM   #5
Jack Hidley is offline Jack Hidley  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Jack Hidley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Danville, CA
DIfferences in ways of measuring Thiel/Small parameters
There is no real difference between using a constant current source or a constant voltage source (normal amplifier) or anything in between.

To calculate the current needed to achieve a given displacement, you need to know BL, Mms and Cms. But if you already know these, then you don't need to take the measurement Just connect the driver to an amplifier with a 50ohm resistor in between, drive it with a sine wave and adjust the frequency until you get maximum visible amplitude. Then adjust the drive level until you get 20% of Xmax by eye. Measure the voltage directly at the driver terminals. This should be your drive level during the TSP measurements.
__________________
Jack Hidley
ACS
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2007, 05:33 AM   #6
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
Trying to use current to get the xmax range using the constant current method requires a much larger amp than normally available. Plus the load on the amp would be so high that would deviate from its original design intent. Hard to say what will affect the test results.

I do wonder if anyone is going to get into the delta mass versus delta volume issue.
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2007, 05:48 AM   #7
davidallancole is offline davidallancole  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Thanks guys.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2007, 07:56 AM   #8
pinkmouse is offline pinkmouse  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
pinkmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rotherham, England
DIfferences in ways of measuring Thiel/Small parameters
Quote:
Originally posted by soongsc
I do wonder if anyone is going to get into the delta mass versus delta volume issue.
All I will say is that I have used both methods and found a pretty good correlation.
__________________
“One of the poets, whose name I cannot recall, has a passage, which I am unable at the moment to remember, in one of his works, which for the time being has slipped my mind, which hits off admirably this age-old situation.”
― PG Wodehouse
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2007, 09:06 AM   #9
richie00boy is offline richie00boy  United Kingdom
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
DIfferences in ways of measuring Thiel/Small parameters
Why does using constant current have problems with ferrofluid?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, modules and more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2007, 02:19 PM   #10
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
Quote:
Originally posted by richie00boy
Why does using constant current have problems with ferrofluid?
Constant current (with a 200-1k series resistor) loses accuracy for higher impedance peaks, and ferrofluid lowers the impedance peaks, so the comment about ferrofluid is mostly spurious. Both methods may have difficulty with small impedance peaks due to the nature of their calculations.

Note that most of these methods assume zero inductance, and there is a way to reduce the effects of inductance on the Qms calculation.

I used to use a 10 ohm series resistor and measure the voltage across the resistor, the speaker and the combo, then you can calculate impedance phase as well as magnitude, and compensate for meter frequency response issues. This is in fact what speaker workshop does. The spot measurements were tedious, so now I use speaker workshop.

Most meters have a poor frequency response. You will get better measurements using speaker workshop or Praxis using a jig.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote

Reply


DIfferences in ways of measuring Thiel/Small parametersHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RCF speakers, thiel and small parameters wanted please ! dock Multi-Way 1 24th August 2008 07:42 AM
Thiel / Small parameters for JBL 12" Baldin Subwoofers 0 10th April 2008 06:06 PM
Testing Thiel Small parameters. AndrewT Multi-Way 2 13th May 2005 06:05 PM
Thiel Small Parameters? lynkage Multi-Way 17 28th April 2004 07:32 AM
how do i find thiel small parameters for the radio shack 40-1035 15" woofer zuki Multi-Way 7 18th February 2004 12:55 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2019 diyAudio
Wiki