Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

W5-2143 vs Peerless NE149
W5-2143 vs Peerless NE149
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th June 2020, 11:34 AM   #1
mayhem13 is offline mayhem13  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Default W5-2143 vs Peerless NE149

Anyone done a comparison of these two drivers run full range? While the NE149 is marketed as a midwoofer, the published response shows it is quite capable of fullrange operation.

The NE149 gets a lot of praise from multi way users as some of the finest midrange quality, high end SEAS and ScanSpeak reference from a drive unit less than half of the big boys which is what started my query.

There is a rise in the response of the 149 centered in the 8khz region on axis but I wonder if that canít be smoothed out with baffle location? Is there any way to simulate that?

I do see the off axis response drops like a stone above 10khz but thatís perfect for me as I intend these as nearfield monitors

I do believe by the specs the 149 to be the better for LF extension unless someone knows otherwise?

Thanks again!
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2020, 05:29 PM   #2
xrk971 is offline xrk971  United States
Got Foam?
diyAudio Member
 
xrk971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Metro DC area
W5-2143 vs Peerless NE149
Interesting question. I was unaware the NE149 was such a capable “full range”. I have the bigger NE180W and really like it’s construction and quality build.
__________________
XRKaudio https://www.etsy.com/shop/XRKAudio
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2020, 12:00 AM   #3
mayhem13 is offline mayhem13  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2020, 04:25 PM   #4
oon_the_kid is offline oon_the_kid  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
oon_the_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Singapore
I have used the sbacoustics midwoofer metal drivers as full rangers before.

For the 5" midwoofer, the frequency response at 20kHz is about 10db higher than at 1kHz.

I guess it doesn't fit their requirements on how one should have flat frequency response across all angles... in which case most full rangers don't fare very well..

Oon
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2020, 02:23 AM   #5
mayhem13 is offline mayhem13  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
I can’t hear a lick above 13khz anyways! Lol
 

Reply


W5-2143 vs Peerless NE149Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enclosure for Tang Band w5-2143 Nasko Full Range 63 9th May 2020 03:12 PM
Some Kind of WAW with W5-2143 EmuMannen Full Range 11 10th March 2020 06:49 PM
TL design with Tangband W-5-2143 luigiman Full Range 18 18th February 2019 11:37 PM
Enclosure for TB w5-2143 nacot Full Range 5 21st January 2016 09:12 PM
Which NE149 For Finalists Midrange Driver Einric Multi-Way 2 10th April 2014 07:26 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2020 diyAudio
Wiki