Link:
Woden Design | Design
You can also contact P10 Dave - maybe he can help too:
Frugal-phile DIY Audio Community Site
Woden Design | Design
You can also contact P10 Dave - maybe he can help too:
Frugal-phile DIY Audio Community Site
It's only 8 am here. Dave may not have had his first coffee yet. Be patient.
jeff
yes, rather the night owl our friend - and I wouldn't be surprised if he manages more than 5hrs sleep a night - plus the several short "lucid" waking naps throughout the day.
As for "helpful advice" - careful what you wish for, but there are a few questions with which I always like to start, not in any particular order:
- room size (exactly how large an area)
- any domestic acceptance factor considerations? - some of the monoliths are 6ft tall, and require at least 4ft of floor space when allowing for rear mouth output
- amplifier type/ power? with low power SETS, class A or T SS, choice of drivers with sufficient sensitivity and requisite enclosure size can be limited
To Dave,
I was looking at the spawn family with the double mouth design. I was thinking front facing mouth? I am definitely inviting suggestion as my knowledge is lacking. What caught my attention was Terry Cains comments about the double BEN, how they can stretch the sweet spot and their sound characteristics.
Chrisb and Dave,
room size is the issue. it is technically outside. it is three sides with the fourth opening out into a pool. The length is 35'. Width of front wall is 25' . Rear wall is 12' . Completely covered. amplifier will be class A tube 25 watts per channel. I will need something not as hyper sensitive to placement. I know absolutely nothing about building speakers but I have 20 yrs of carpentry experience so I feel confident of being able to build following plans. As long as I keep my system out back I can build pretty much what I want without getting heavy Resistance from wife.
Mike
I was looking at the spawn family with the double mouth design. I was thinking front facing mouth? I am definitely inviting suggestion as my knowledge is lacking. What caught my attention was Terry Cains comments about the double BEN, how they can stretch the sweet spot and their sound characteristics.
Chrisb and Dave,
room size is the issue. it is technically outside. it is three sides with the fourth opening out into a pool. The length is 35'. Width of front wall is 25' . Rear wall is 12' . Completely covered. amplifier will be class A tube 25 watts per channel. I will need something not as hyper sensitive to placement. I know absolutely nothing about building speakers but I have 20 yrs of carpentry experience so I feel confident of being able to build following plans. As long as I keep my system out back I can build pretty much what I want without getting heavy Resistance from wife.
Mike
Sounds like the Haruna FE166E might be the ticket? At 72" H x 10.5" W x 18.5" D, still not a tiny enclosure, and we would highly recommend quality Baltic Birch plywood or equivalent for sonic and ergonomic reasons - as best as I can recall, the most part of 3 full sheets of material in a pair of these .
the double BEN
That was the inspiration for the doublemouth horns and BVRs.
The length is 35'. Width of front wall is 25' . Rear wall is 12' .
Even the largest will dissapear in a space that size.
They are all fairly easy to build, just lots of pieces in some cases.
dave
I was able to look at those plans, not sure why I couldn't earlier. I have the space for the Kirishima's. any reason you recommended the Haruna over them?
Not particularly - I tend to prefer the 166 over the 206, but then I've only heard either of those in rooms larger than my own, but still smaller than the great outdoors.
166 actually - IIRC, the only of the 206 family I heard was actually one of the ESR models of a fair while back, in one of the Fostex's upright freezer sized BLH enclosures. It had no trouble filling a moderate sized room with only 3/4 watt of 45 "Triode-cream", but definitely needed some help in the top couple of octaves.
IOW, I think the 166 would be a better bet if you didn't want the expense of a tweeter.
Yes, it's easy enough to suffer from analysis paralysis, without "helpful advice" from us here - I did warn you -
IOW, I think the 166 would be a better bet if you didn't want the expense of a tweeter.
Yes, it's easy enough to suffer from analysis paralysis, without "helpful advice" from us here - I did warn you -
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- Am I late to the party? frugal horn, Woden Designs