Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
|View Poll Results: Select the driver that you think sounds the best.|
|Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll|
||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|4th September 2015, 03:12 PM||#1|
A Subjective Blind Comparison of 2in to 4in drivers - Round 4
Please do not discuss your selection (vote) or what you think the identity of any particular driver is prior to the reveal. Be considerate and allow others to listen and make up their minds without undue influence. It is fine to discuss your process, your thinking and generalities of the driver characteristics. Just avoid labeling Driver X as brand Y etc. If you must prognosticate and want your selections to be recorded for proof of your amazing abilities to pick and name the drivers presented, please do so by creating a text file and uploading that with your post. Add lots of carriage returns to your text file so that the answers are at the bottom and require active mouse movements to reveal the spoiler. Otherwise, an accidental mouse click shows all.
As the 4th installment of the long running saga of blind subjective driver listening tests, this one will be a finale that includes the winner from Rounds 1-3 plus the TG9FD and a secret driver of my choice (from the previous 3 rounds). I have 3 sound clips which were selected based on input and feedback from participants of previous rounds. The sound clips are converted to mono for playback on a solitary speaker, but the sound clips recorded for your listening pleasure are in stereo - to simulate what your stereophonic hearing apparatus perceives if you were actually in my lab auditioning them. You can, of course, at your discretion, convert the recorded sound clips to mono to remove the distraction of the room ambiance.
For those unfamiliar with the routine and specifics, please refer to previous thread on Round 3 and references therein. I will only point out the basics here and major changes to the setup from Round 3:
- FAST using my 10F/RS225 Reference speaker (described in another thread) but with the original full range driver removed and replaced with the driver under test. The rear chamber is a tall 3 sided pyramid or "Dagger" stuffed with fiberglass and has very low - almost zero signature and no signs of "boxyness".
- Drivers under test are fitted with sheets of foam core to permit a flush mounted driver to reduce diffraction in the high frequencies. The offset mounting in a rectangular baffle already reduces the diffraction signifcantly.
- Source tracks are converted to mono on Audacity and saved as .wav files and then three test tracks are burned into a single track on a CD. A Phillips CD player provides the music source via the headphone outs which allow volume adjustment for the miniDSP which drives two Ybdz TPA3116D2 amps with OSCON cap mod and bootstrap snubber mod. The miniDSP is using a Harsch XO set at 350Hz XO frequency. The *only* adjustment made in miniDSP between drivers is adjustment of the level of the full range to normalize for different sensitivities (typical -1dB to -4dB).
- Sound clips are recorded in stereo in 24bit 96kHz .wav files with a Zoom H4 recorder to microSD card. Files are then processed in Audacity to set consistent volume at -0.5dB peak for Clips 1 and 3, and -1dB for Clip 2, then converted to 320kbit 48kHz sampled mp3 files. Files are renamed with .asc extension to allow large file uploads to diyAudio servers. Please change extension back to .mp3 to listen.
- The answer key to the driver identities is provided to two diyAudio moderators in case anyone ever suspects identity tampering following results.
Here are the winners from Rounds 1, 2, and 3:
- Vifa TC9FD18-08 (3.5in paper cone ferrite magnet 8 ohms)
- ScanSpeak 10F/8424G00 (3.5in fiberglass cone Nd magnet 8 ohms)
- Visaton B80 8 ohm (3.5in paper cone Nd magnet 8 ohms)
to this I will add the
- Vifa TG9FD10-08 (3.5in fiberglass cone ferrite magnet 8 ohm version) to allow a fiberglass cone per user requests
And I will also add my secret driver for five total drivers randomly labeled:
A, B, D, E, F (note C is missing because I was going to add two secret drivers but decided against it to keep it lean and fast).
Here is a photo of the 4 drivers (secret one not shown):
Here is a photo showing detail of the flush mounting rebate with foam core:
Sound clips to follow... Enjoy and have fun!
Edit (Sept 5, 2015): Adding list of all drivers tested in all 3 rounds leading up to this finale. We are now auditioning and selecting the top 3 (plus 1 that I selected) from a total of 21 drivers. In general, the driver with the flattest response has taken the top spot - so now we are listening to the best of the best in terms of flat frequency response so it is not surprising that it is hard to hear a difference as that is the principal means that our ears differentiate sound voice signature.
Round 1: Winner = TC9FD
1. Vifa TC9FD (3.5in paper cone 8 ohm)
2. Faital Pro 3FE22 (3in paper cone 16 ohm)
3. Dayton Audio RS100-4 (3.5in aluminum cone 4 ohm)
4. Dayton Audio RS100P-4 (3.5inpaper cone 4 ohm)
5. Dayton Audio PS95-8 (3in paper cone 8 ohm)
6. MA CHN-70 (4in paper cone 8 ohm)
7. PRV 5MR450NDY (5in 'midrange' pro audio paper cone 8 ohm)
Round 2: Winner = 10F/8424
8. Vifa TG9FD10-8 (fiberglass cone)
9. Tang Band W4-1320SB (paper cone)
10. Peerless P830986 (aluminum cone)
11. Fostex FF105WK (paper cone)
12. ScanSpeak 10F/8424G00 (fiberglass cone)
13. Mark Audio Alpair A7.3 (silver cone) (aluminum cone)
14. AHE 3in (from Taiwan) (paper cone) http://m.ruten.com.tw/goods/show.php?g=21206258966085
Round 3: Winner = B80
15. SB Accoustics SB65WBAC25-4 (2.5in aluminum cone Nd magnet)
16. Peerless P830983 (2in aluminum cone Nd magnet)
17. Tang Band W3-1364SA (3in bamboo cone Nd magnet)
18. GR Research LGK (3in paper cone ferrite magnet)
19. Mark Audio Alpair A7P (4in paper cone ferrite magnet)
20. Visaton B80 (3.5in paper cone Nd magnet)
21. Visaton FRS5X (8ohm 2in paper cone ferrite magnet)
*REPEAT* Mark Audio Alpair A7.3 (aluminum cone ferrite magnet - previously tested in Round 2)
Edit (Sept. 5, 2015, 2150EDT): Level matched reference sound clips are available here LINK in case you want an easy to compare reference track that is at about the same volume as the test clips.
Edit Sept. 15, 2015: Reveal is here.
Last edited by xrk971; 15th September 2015 at 02:26 PM.
|4th September 2015, 08:03 PM||#7|
@Barleywater: ref clips coming soon. Ran out of time.
@Freddi: wow I am surprised you could discern a favorite so quickly.
|4th September 2015, 09:22 PM||#8|
Join Date: Aug 2005
@xrk971 - the guitar intro clip "screeched" with subjective high-Q resonance on all but one driver - could be the headphones/my hearing
|4th September 2015, 09:54 PM||#9|
Reference Sound Clip Source Files
These were converted from CD .wav files to mp3 in 320kbit format. Change extension to .mp3 to listen.
|4th September 2015, 11:54 PM||#10|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North West, UK
Ooo... interesting, very interesting... Tough call between two of them, but think I've just about picked a favourite from the bunch. Will listen a few more times over the weekend, just to make sure.
Listening with Gusto!
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|A Subjective Blind Comparison of 3in to 5in drivers - Round 2||xrk971||Full Range||463||24th July 2020 03:58 PM|
|A Subjective Blind Comparison of 2in to 4in drivers - Round 3||xrk971||Full Range||436||26th September 2016 04:03 PM|
|A Subjective Blind Comparison of 3in to 5in Full Range Drivers||xrk971||Full Range||680||9th August 2016 11:52 AM|
|Pros and Cons of Remote Subjective Blind Auditioning of Drivers||xrk971||Multi-Way||134||21st July 2015 02:06 PM|
|An Objective Comparison of 3in - 4in Class Full Range Drivers||xrk971||Full Range||507||27th February 2015 09:12 PM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|