|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#51 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Your sources are two sensationalist articles in the popular press, with partial (selective) quotations, and devoid of referencing.
EU Today and The Parliament Magazine are not acredited, peer reviewed scientific journals with rigourous standards imposed to ensure data accuracy. Please provide the peer-reviewed scientific articles which have the data supporting the contentions / allegations. I'm not saying they don't exist. I'm asking you to provide them so I can read them and draw conclusions from a proper evidential basis.
__________________
www.wodendesign.com (commercial site) www.frugal-horn.com www.frugal-phile.com (community sites) Last edited by Scottmoose; 28th November 2020 at 04:32 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2017
|
You are like a stubborn child and I'm not responsible for your education. You claimed that there is no evidence that mineral wool is hazardous! That's plain absurd!
IARC Publications Website - Man-Made Mineral Fibres and Radon But maybe you and waxx are the real experts on mineral wool and the WHO and IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) are complete idiots... ![]() Last edited by SinGun; 28th November 2020 at 09:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Wodecq, Belgium
|
Quote:
IARC Publications Website - Man-made Vitreous Fibres |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2017
|
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. The 1988 research is about the products that used NOW on the market. The 2002 reseach is on mineral wool that was provided than but it is not used now.
Jesus Christ! STOP WRITING UTTERLY NONSENSE. You are not understanding it that's proven. |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Now, the monograph linked to was superceeded in light of subsequent research. Which is a simple matter of historiographical fact, not opinion, whether you like it or not. The onus on proving statements rests on those who make them. I have indicated several times that I am perfectly willing to read the peer-reviewed scientific data and revise my views if that data points to it, yet, mysteriously, you refuse to do so. What I am not willing to do is accept at face value sensationalist articles in the popular press devoid of any kind of referencing, peer review, fact checking, or editorial neutrality.
__________________
www.wodendesign.com (commercial site) www.frugal-horn.com www.frugal-phile.com (community sites) Last edited by Scottmoose; 28th November 2020 at 10:15 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Philips 9710 enclosure recommendation (pics) | ARIYAHOOR | Full Range | 32 | 31st July 2012 04:23 PM |
Ringing in Philips 9710 | Gregje | Full Range | 6 | 14th June 2011 09:56 PM |
Question about bass driver in combination with Philips 9710? | bezobraznia | Multi-Way | 3 | 13th December 2008 08:15 AM |
Fostex FE206E or Philips AD 9710 M8 | 69122s | Full Range | 14 | 6th December 2007 10:29 AM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |