Philips 9710 M/8 new enclosure help.

[Scottmoose]

Your sources are two sensationalist articles in the popular press, with partial (selective) quotations, and devoid of referencing.

EU Today and The Parliament Magazine are not acredited, peer reviewed scientific journals with rigourous standards imposed to ensure data accuracy. Please provide the peer-reviewed scientific articles which have the data supporting the contentions / allegations. I'm not saying they don't exist. I'm asking you to provide them so I can read them and draw conclusions from a proper evidential basis.

[SinGun]

You are like a stubborn child and I'm not responsible for your education. You claimed that there is no evidence that mineral wool is hazardous! That's plain absurd!

IARC Publications Website - Man-Made Mineral Fibres and Radon

But maybe you and waxx are the real experts on mineral wool and the WHO and IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) are complete idiots...

[waxx]

Originally Posted by SinGun

You are like a stubborn child and I'm not responsible for your education. You claimed that there is no evidence that mineral wool is hazardous! That's plain absurd!

IARC Publications Website - Man-Made Mineral Fibres and Radon

But maybe you and waxx are the real experts on mineral wool and the WHO and IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) are complete idiots...

Yours is the 1987 version that was recalled as not true in this WHO publication of 2002:

IARC Publications Website - Man-made Vitreous Fibres

[SinGun]

You don't have a clue what you are talking about. The 1988 research is about the products that used NOW on the market. The 2002 reseach is on mineral wool that was provided than but it is not used now.

Jesus Christ! STOP WRITING UTTERLY NONSENSE. You are not understanding it that's proven.

[Scottmoose]

Originally Posted by SinGun

You are like a stubborn child and I'm not responsible for your education. You claimed that there is no evidence that mineral wool is hazardous! That's plain absurd!

IARC Publications Website - Man-Made Mineral Fibres and Radon

But maybe you and waxx are the real experts on mineral wool and the WHO and IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) are complete idiots...

If you could stop blaspheming that would be super.

Now, the monograph linked to was superceeded in light of subsequent research. Which is a simple matter of historiographical fact, not opinion, whether you like it or not. The onus on proving statements rests on those who make them. I have indicated several times that I am perfectly willing to read the peer-reviewed scientific data and revise my views if that data points to it, yet, mysteriously, you refuse to do so. What I am not willing to do is accept at face value sensationalist articles in the popular press devoid of any kind of referencing, peer review, fact checking, or editorial neutrality.