Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Philips 9710 M/8 new enclosure help.
Philips 9710 M/8 new enclosure help.
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28th November 2020, 04:13 PM   #51
Scottmoose is offline Scottmoose  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Your sources are two sensationalist articles in the popular press, with partial (selective) quotations, and devoid of referencing.

EU Today and The Parliament Magazine are not acredited, peer reviewed scientific journals with rigourous standards imposed to ensure data accuracy. Please provide the peer-reviewed scientific articles which have the data supporting the contentions / allegations. I'm not saying they don't exist. I'm asking you to provide them so I can read them and draw conclusions from a proper evidential basis.
__________________
www.wodendesign.com (commercial site)
www.frugal-horn.com www.frugal-phile.com (community sites)

Last edited by Scottmoose; 28th November 2020 at 04:32 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2020, 09:29 PM   #52
SinGun is offline SinGun  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
SinGun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
You are like a stubborn child and I'm not responsible for your education. You claimed that there is no evidence that mineral wool is hazardous! That's plain absurd!

IARC Publications Website - Man-Made Mineral Fibres and Radon

But maybe you and waxx are the real experts on mineral wool and the WHO and IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) are complete idiots...

Last edited by SinGun; 28th November 2020 at 09:33 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2020, 09:34 PM   #53
waxx is offline waxx  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Wodecq, Belgium
Quote:
Originally Posted by SinGun View Post
You are like a stubborn child and I'm not responsible for your education. You claimed that there is no evidence that mineral wool is hazardous! That's plain absurd!

IARC Publications Website - Man-Made Mineral Fibres and Radon

But maybe you and waxx are the real experts on mineral wool and the WHO and IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) are complete idiots...
Yours is the 1987 version that was recalled as not true in this WHO publication of 2002:

IARC Publications Website - Man-made Vitreous Fibres
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2020, 09:37 PM   #54
SinGun is offline SinGun  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
SinGun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. The 1988 research is about the products that used NOW on the market. The 2002 reseach is on mineral wool that was provided than but it is not used now.

Jesus Christ! STOP WRITING UTTERLY NONSENSE. You are not understanding it that's proven.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2020, 10:05 PM   #55
Scottmoose is offline Scottmoose  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by SinGun View Post
You are like a stubborn child and I'm not responsible for your education. You claimed that there is no evidence that mineral wool is hazardous! That's plain absurd!

IARC Publications Website - Man-Made Mineral Fibres and Radon

But maybe you and waxx are the real experts on mineral wool and the WHO and IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) are complete idiots...
If you could stop blaspheming that would be super.

Now, the monograph linked to was superceeded in light of subsequent research. Which is a simple matter of historiographical fact, not opinion, whether you like it or not. The onus on proving statements rests on those who make them. I have indicated several times that I am perfectly willing to read the peer-reviewed scientific data and revise my views if that data points to it, yet, mysteriously, you refuse to do so. What I am not willing to do is accept at face value sensationalist articles in the popular press devoid of any kind of referencing, peer review, fact checking, or editorial neutrality.
__________________
www.wodendesign.com (commercial site)
www.frugal-horn.com www.frugal-phile.com (community sites)

Last edited by Scottmoose; 28th November 2020 at 10:15 PM.
  Reply to this post

Reply


Philips 9710 M/8 new enclosure help.Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Philips 9710 enclosure recommendation (pics) ARIYAHOOR Full Range 32 31st July 2012 04:23 PM
Ringing in Philips 9710 Gregje Full Range 6 14th June 2011 09:56 PM
Question about bass driver in combination with Philips 9710? bezobraznia Multi-Way 3 13th December 2008 08:15 AM
Fostex FE206E or Philips AD 9710 M8 69122s Full Range 14 6th December 2007 10:29 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 14.29%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio
Wiki