You crossed the line at some point and are a normal registered user now. There are no hard and fast rules in reaching that point.
I'm curious about the part in bold. Are there guidelines for how long one's posts have to be approved? I've not had forum probation in well over a decade!
I'm curious about the part in bold......
And so am I actually, because I never posted with that bold emphasis Anyone jumping in to the thread at this point now sees a different meaning to what was intended.
RULES
12: Improper use of the Quote function such as altering the words or meaning of the quote, misquoting or lack of quote attribution.
And it all simply meant that each member is treated as a unique case when deciding when to release them from moderation.
And so am I actually, because I never posted with that bold emphasis Anyone jumping in to the thread at this point now sees a different meaning to what was intended.
RULES
And it all simply meant that each member is treated as a unique case when deciding when to release them from moderation.
Hmmmm... OK.
As for the quote or rule 12 re. improper use of the Quote function, I'd think that highlighting a portion would be the preferred method. Otherwise, if I simply truncated the quoted text, it would certainly be taking it out of context. Is there a preferred way of doing this? Perhaps I should add "quotes added by me for reference" to avoid confusion. The good thing is that if somebody quotes me, the post that I quoted doesn't show up, base on what I've seen.
The forum highly discourages changing quotes in any way other than picking the relevant sentences. There is unfortunate history behind that.
There is no set number of posts to be freed. The moderation team want to see that newbs are not spammers (they are plentiful) and that a new person understands the rules.
There is no set number of posts to be freed. The moderation team want to see that newbs are not spammers (they are plentiful) and that a new person understands the rules.
Otherwise, if I simply truncated the quoted text, it would certainly be taking it out of context.
Au contraire mon ami. We have stated this is the referred method after thorough examination of the subject.
Huh?Au contraire mon ami. We have stated this is the referred method after thorough examination of the subject.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
you know what they say about 'appearances'It appears that this forum has some very bright minds...
edit: oops. I thought we were in the Lounge.
David CA. This forum has a long and busy history. Thru much experience, trial and error the moderation team has fine tuned the machine.
We do not allow quotes to be altered because it's unfair to the person being quoted and has been the source of serious problems in the past. Some members were banned for repeatedly altering quotes to change their meaning. What we DO allow and encourage is selecting the appropriate part of the post you wish to quote, without taking it out of context.
We do not allow quotes to be altered because it's unfair to the person being quoted and has been the source of serious problems in the past. Some members were banned for repeatedly altering quotes to change their meaning. What we DO allow and encourage is selecting the appropriate part of the post you wish to quote, without taking it out of context.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Site
- Forum Problems & Feedback
- How long / many posts before my posts don't need moderating?