Sound signature

[Evenharmonics]

Originally Posted by scottjoplin

I thought that was the nature of sound?

I would call that the nature of internet forums.

[analog_sa]

Originally Posted by thor2

That they actually do not know what gives the good sound signature.

Myself, and no doubt many others, agree with everything you have shared in this thread but please realise: you are wasting your time here. The army of idle, clueless trolls will drain all your energy and drown your thread with noise. There is just no point persisting, other venues are a lot more suitable for such discussions.

[scottjoplin]

I would have thought we were all on your ignore list.

[Lojzek]

The issue appears to be one group of audiophiles believes musical instruments and equipment to reproduce the sound of a musical instrument is one and the same thing.

[Evenharmonics]

Originally Posted by analog_sa

you are wasting your time here.

Helpful tip for you and thor2, good way to save time is to back up the claim with evidence.

There is just no point persisting, other venues are a lot more suitable for such discussions.

There sure are audio related venues which the use of evidence isn't popular. One member there uses bag of pebbles taped to the interconnect cable plugs for sound improvement.

[schiirrn]

Originally Posted by indra1

What measurement did you do? Semper Fi told a different story in Resistors thread.

No. In what you quoted he says the exact same thing as me about different resitors (as all other parts) come with different parasitics.

I am adding to that that this can be enough to tune an unstable circuit node to a different oscillation or set off or stop oscillation which could be perceived as "different sound signature".

[jan.didden]

Originally Posted by thor2

Building hi-fi is like being a chef, you have a recipe / diagram, you buy ingredients, the dish is made and tasted in the end.

Nonsense. Audio is engineering.

Jan

[jan.didden]

Originally Posted by schiirrn

this can be enough to tune an unstable circuit node to a different oscillation or set off or stop oscillation which could be perceived as "different sound signature".

And that would be an incompetently designed piece of equipment, of course.

Jan

[cbdb]

Originally Posted by analog_sa

Myself, and no doubt many others, agree with everything you have shared in this thread but please realise: you are wasting your time here. The army of idle, clueless trolls will drain all your energy and drown your thread with noise. There is just no point persisting, other venues are a lot more suitable for such discussions.

Yea try the flat earthers or the the no vaccers, there are also other places where hairbrained ideas get full support with absolutely no proof, logic, or scientific backing. There the army of idle, clueless trolls will back up every dumb idea you have.

[indra1]

Originally Posted by schiirrn

No. In what you quoted he says the exact same thing as me about different resitors (as all other parts) come with different parasitics.

I agree on this part. But one point he clearly made is that one resistor he measured act as a high pass filter with a 10kHz corner frequency, no need to go into node stability or oscillation at all. 20 years ago, that resistor would be audibly muddy to me, even used on a passive attenuation network, no relation to stability.