Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Equipment & Tools From test equipment to hand tools

ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications
ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 5th January 2020, 07:26 PM   #1
syn08 is offline syn08  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
syn08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Default ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1audio View Post
Actually there are real considerations for the audio market that are different other that the elusive "sound". SNR or dynamic range in the audio band. A weights noise. THD which is related but not identical to DNL or INL. At the same time adding a lot of overhead to using an ADC (external interface logic, filtering etc.) would need justification if the primary requirements are not substantially better. SAR ADC's have a lot of interesting applications and the separation of the sampling rate from basic function can be really helpful in specific applications but audio will have very constant predictable sample rates etc. and the additional flexibility is not a benefit.
All audio grade ADCs, PCM4222, AK5572, CS5381, etc... have the (in my opinion) big issue of a sharp increase of the noise floor at high frequencies, making for example low distortion measurements @20KHz practically impossible. These noise humps root causes are well understood and very difficult to avoid in sigma-delta converters. I myself do not believe in the relevance of distortions @1KHz for the overall amplifier quality, so I consider audio measurements @20KHz critical.

Otherwise, I don't see in audio grade ADCs the DNL and INL (and in general any linearity metric) seriously characterized (other than a chart with a straight line), compare with the datasheet for a 20bit SAR (see attached). SNR and dynamic range in the audio band are related to the number of bits (and there are SARs up to 32bit, sacrificing the distortion performance for SNR and DR, but 20bit seems to be kind of sweet spot today).

Again, I don't preach any SAR for audio applications - but for audio instrumentation purposes they appears to me as a much better option than audio ADCs. Again, audio grade ADCs are simply not specified for instrumentation (and rightfully so, since this is not what they are designed for, as much as industrial grade SARs don't specify for example the A-weighted noise).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Untitled.jpg (312.1 KB, 1924 views)

Last edited by syn08; 31st March 2021 at 05:19 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 07:47 PM   #2
JensH is offline JensH  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications
Quote:
Originally Posted by syn08 View Post
All audio grade ADCs, PCM4222, AK5572, CS5381, etc... have the (in my opinion) big issue of a sharp increase of the noise floor at high frequencies, making for example low distortion measurements @20KHz practically impossible.
There is at least one exception, the AK5394A
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 07:50 PM   #3
1audio is online now 1audio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications
The only measurement grade ADC in the audio portfolio was the AK5394A now discontinued. All the others trade audio band SNR for increasing noise out of band. I don't know DNL or INL have ever been characterized for the AK5394 (or any other audio part). it would be interesting. I'm not sure Virtins reported numbers are valid for ENOB etc. but they look serious.
__________________
Demian Martin
Product Design Services
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 08:53 PM   #4
syn08 is offline syn08  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
syn08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by JensH View Post
There is at least one exception, the AK5394A
That could be the first and the last exception, for quite some time. But even this one, being limited to 216KHz sampling rate, is IMO not ideal for instrumentation. At 1Ms/sec (actually the LTC2378-20 works great even at 1.3Ms/sec), the modern 20bit SARs are beating it hands down.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 08:55 PM   #5
syn08 is offline syn08  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
syn08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1audio View Post
I'm not sure Virtins reported numbers are valid for ENOB etc. but they look serious.
Not being a Virtins user, I did not know it can deliver this parameter. What is it showing for the AK5394 ENOB, at the maximum sampling rate?
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 09:02 PM   #6
1audio is online now 1audio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications
I'll set up for that test later today. I thin I'll need to use an external oscillator so the DAC limitation is not there. And it would be at an audio frequency where the chip will deliver its best results. A current get SAR or even the newer delta sigma ADC's for industral application may do better. Very little new stuff has been done for audio ADC's in many years. Even AKM admits this whole line is a vanity project. None of these end up in cell phones where money is to be made. I got similar feedback from the guy managing the TI ADC and DAC biz. No volume or money in DAC's or ADC's over 100 dB SNR. Just not enough volume. ESS's success in cell phones is an outlier for now.
__________________
Demian Martin
Product Design Services
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 09:52 PM   #7
soekris is offline soekris  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Korsør, Denmark
ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications
You can always use one of the faster ones like the LTC2387-18....
Or interleave multiple slower ones.... Or both :-) although that get expensive just for the parts.... And then decimate.
__________________
Søren - www.soekris.dk
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 10:40 PM   #8
1audio is online now 1audio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications
Here are a couple of plots using an external generator (AM70A) @ 1KHz. I'm not sure how to proplery interprest them or if the ENOB is valid. The generator is analog so it will have considerable phase noise compared to a digital source but much lower distortion. The distortion is all AK5394A + analog stuff. And, to be sure, this is not a truly optimum connection.
Attached Images
File Type: png RTX ADC at -3.2 dBFS.PNG (113.9 KB, 1933 views)
File Type: png RTX ADC at -13 dBFS.PNG (102.9 KB, 1910 views)
__________________
Demian Martin
Product Design Services
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 10:48 PM   #9
1audio is online now 1audio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applications
And this is what I get looking with a different tool. For audio and for amplifiers this is more useful for diagnostics but not as useful for some measurement tasks.
Attached Images
File Type: png RTX ADC at -3.2 dBFS DiAna.PNG (30.2 KB, 1899 views)
__________________
Demian Martin
Product Design Services
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2020, 11:11 PM   #10
syn08 is offline syn08  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
syn08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1audio View Post
Here are a couple of plots using an external generator (AM70A) @ 1KHz. I'm not sure how to proplery interprest them or if the ENOB is valid. The generator is analog so it will have considerable phase noise compared to a digital source but much lower distortion. The distortion is all AK5394A + analog stuff. And, to be sure, this is not a truly optimum connection.
15.4bit ENOB for a 24 bit ADC is rather low; I've posted earlier the ENOB for a 20 bit SAR (16.45 bit). I would think yours include a good chunk from the generator phase noise.

Last edited by syn08; 5th January 2020 at 11:28 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


ADCs and DACs for audio instrumentation applicationsHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Digital Audio ICs - ADCs, DACs, SRCs, other stuff.. len_scanlan Swap Meet 0 29th December 2011 08:40 AM
Fundamental Questions: ADCs, DACs, I2S rsbonini Construction Tips 10 5th August 2011 09:40 PM
M-Audio Delta-44 and instrumentation under Linux suzyj Digital Source 8 27th July 2007 03:43 PM
Audio DACs, Instrumentation DACs. Brian Guralnick Digital Source 10 3rd November 2002 04:56 PM
DSD ADCs and DACs Brett Digital Source 8 14th October 2002 08:59 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 13.64%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio
Wiki