DHT OTL Linestage - Tram 2

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I agree, I see the circuit the same way, the 6AS7 is the top of the super-mu (as it's also described by the designers in the beginning of the thread)... Sometimes I just can't find the proper words in English to describe what I mean. Describing technical stuff in a second language is not easy (for me), I knew it was not really correct when I wrote that the 6AS7 is in the final stage of the PS, and when I wrote it I expected that someone would ''correct me'' ;) My point was, that it's not directly in the signal path doing signal amplification as in those headamps, I just could not find better words. Thanks for clarifying with a more proper description, links, references and all...
 
Last edited:
...... In other uses I prefer 6080 over 6AS7, but unfortunately they are tricky to use in the Tram2 due to the size of the base on most 6080s.

That's interesting. Thanks Simon. May I ask you a couple of questions?

I have plenty of 6080's but found , like you that they just dont fit through the Tram2 top plate. Have you get any thoughts about the easiest way to enlarge the Tram2 6AS7 top plate opening to let the 6080 in?

Also since you understand the circuit and I dont do you think any 6AS7 type variants that have higher mu factors then the 6AS7/6080 mu=2 would be OK to try or are they going to push the circuit out of designed spec's?
 
That's interesting. Thanks Simon. May I ask you a couple of questions?

I have plenty of 6080's but found , like you that they just dont fit through the Tram2 top plate. Have you get any thoughts about the easiest way to enlarge the Tram2 6AS7 top plate opening to let the 6080 in?

Also since you understand the circuit and I dont do you think any 6AS7 type variants that have higher mu factors then the 6AS7/6080 mu=2 would be OK to try or are they going to push the circuit out of designed spec's?

I think they were mentioned earlier in the thread, but an octal socket saver is probably the best place to start for experimenting, something like this:
VACUUM TUBE 8 PIN OCTAL SOCKET SAVER for 6L6 6V6 6SN7 EL34 ST8-1000 on eBay!

As for using the near equivalent valves with a higher mu, I am not certain as I haven't really thought about it. Could be worth running a few sims to check it out. The brief look through the links I posted earlier seem to make me think it shouldn't be a huge problem, but it is whether any of the circuit needs a tweak to work with the change in tubes, and I cant answer that at the moment as I have not actually played around with the circuit.
 
Richard, I think your own diagnosis is correct: You have a dead DHT regulator board...

Hi all, so my brand new but faulty Tram2 went to the doctor and is currently undergoing surgery. Turns out that one of the CCS modules was dead and there were multiple earthing faults.

The earthing issues have been fixed, and the Coleman regulators have been installed.

While the amp is still in surgery and waiting for a replacement CCS kit (thanks Simon!), i decided to order some Duelund Alexanders for input caps, Mundorf Supremes for output caps, Audio Note tantalum resistors, and one of those Philips rectifer tubes.

In the meantime, a friend who had just installed Coleman regulators brought his Tram2 around for a few hours of listening -- this Tram2 is stuffed with premium parts, including wire. My goodness it sounded good! Just beautiful to listen to... and this is with brand new parts, not run-in at all, and also relatively cold.

So now i am even more excited and feeling very impatient to get mine running!!

- richard
 
Hi Richard,

Great to hear, that you are getting the preamp repaired :) Please remember to upgrade the cap + resistor on the Rod Coleman modules, it gives a nice improvement for little money and is so much easier to do before the modules are installed, than after...

Nice parts you are getting... The Duelund Alexander's has a slightly warmer and slightly less transparent sound compared to the more expensive models, but they still have the amazing natural sound that is the ''Duelund sound'', or maybe one should say lack of sound. It's one of those products that I'm proud of saying comes from our lille country :cool:

Nice with the other parts..! Personally I prefer the Shinkoh tantalium resistors over the AN, but all tantaliums are really nice... Also IMHO the Obbligato tinfoils are better than the Mundorf supremes for output caps, if you are talking about the standard Supremes that is? If you are going for the Supreme silver/gold/oil that is another story, but costly and takes up a lot of space since at least 12uF is needed...

Besides the Philips rectifier, what kind of tubes will you be using..!? :)
 
Last edited:
but costly and takes up a lot of space since at least 12uF is needed...

You only need 12uF if you retain the voltage divider network on the output, and have a SS power amp with low input impedance, as it appears to have been designed to work with loads down to about 10K.

Personally I have reasonably low sensitivity valve power amps with 100K input impedance, so I have replaced the voltage divider with a more regular 1M0 resistor, and the 12uF Obliggattos with 1uF Hovland output caps. :)
 
You only need 12uF if you retain the voltage divider network on the output, and have a SS power amp with low input impedance, as it appears to have been designed to work with loads down to about 10K.

Personally I have reasonably low sensitivity valve power amps with 100K input impedance, so I have replaced the voltage divider with a more regular 1M0 resistor, and the 12uF Obliggattos with 1uF Hovland output caps. :)

Yes, I know, this is obvious... If the cap just see a 100K load or equal then around 470nF is enough.

But how do you then load your triode after taking out the resistor network? They are designed to ''see'' the impedance around what the resistor network is, or what an output transformer is on the input - if one was used... Again, I think I better not try to get myself to far into the technical, I manage to get myself misunderstood every time I try ;-) But I think you know what I mean... My English is not good enough for that... Technical stuff and humor/irony is extremely difficult in a foreign language, even with 30 years of experience with electronics, and 45 years of experience with humor...
 
Last edited:
Yes, I know, this is obvious... If the cap just see a 100K load or equal then less than 1 uf is more than enough.

But how do you then load your triode after taking out the resistor network? They are designed to ''see'' the impedance around what the resistor network is, or what an output transformer is on the input - if one was used... Again, I think I better not try to get myself to far into the technical, but I think you know what I mean... My English is not good enough for that... Technical stuff and humor/irony is extremely difficult in a foreign language...

In the Tram2 the 3 resistors which form a voltage divider network between the +6dB output and ground (2K4, 820R and 560R) and the 470R series resistor on the output were removed entirely.

The new output cap then goes from the MU out on the CCS pcb to the +6dB output phono centre pin. The 1M0 output resistor then goes from the +6dB output phono centre pin to ground. I only have a single pair of output sockets wired up, the other two pairs are not used. It is at +6dB full output, which is fine in my system.

The 1M0 resistor across the output is primarily there for safety, when the preamp is not connected to the load presented by a power amp it avoids the output of the cap rising in voltage due to electrostatic charge. In normal operation the active stage now sees the 1M0 on the output in parallel with the 100K input on the power amp, approx 91K, so a 1uF cap is more than enough.

This works ok for my application in my system, my power amps are not very sensitive about 1V to 15W full output, and my speakers are only 91dB/W. I currently have the Mk3 DIY filament boards and setup nicely I do not have a problem hum or hiss from the Tram2 compared to my other valve preamplifiers. The Rob Coleman boards will be installed in the next few weeks, followed by a change in resistors.
 
Last edited:
In the Tram2 the 3 resistors which form a voltage divider network between the +6dB output and ground (2K4, 820R and 560R) and the 470R series resistor on the output were removed entirely.

The new output cap then goes from the MU out on the CCS pcb to the +6dB output phono centre pin. The 1M0 output resistor then goes from the +6dB output phono centre pin to ground. I only have a single pair of output sockets wired up, the other two pairs are not used. It is at +6dB full output, which is fine in my system.

The 1M0 resistor across the output is primarily there for safety, when the preamp is not connected to the load presented by a power amp it avoids the output of the cap rising in voltage due to electrostatic charge. In normal operation the active stage now sees the 1M0 on the output in parallel with the 100K input on the power amp, approx 91K, so a 1uF cap is more than enough.

This works ok for my application in my system, my power amps are not very sensitive about 1V to 15W full output, and my speakers are only 91dB/W. I currently have the Mk3 DIY filament boards and setup nicely I do not have a problem hum or hiss from the Tram2 compared to my other valve preamplifiers.

Yes, I understand that is how you have wired it up after taking out the resistor network. And I know that 100K // 1M = 91K... And I also know that with 1uF you have a nice low corner frequency when the caps just ''see'' 91K instead of the resistor network.This is not what I'm talking about.

I'm talking about loading your triode on the output. Sorry again, I don't have the words to explain in English, but try to look up a data-sheet on a 2A3. Depending on the voltages on the tube the load on the output should be in around 3 - 6kohm or so (if memory serves me correct, I have not seen one of these data sheets for many years). If you don't load the triodes correctly you will not be in the tubes linear operating range and distortion will be high... I'm quite sure that the designers have choosen the values of the resistors in the network on the output to get the triodes in their most linear range with the voltages for the tubes in the Tram II. Now you load the triodes with 91K ohm, and I don't think this is that good...
 
Last edited:
Yes, I understand that is how you have wired it up after taking out the resistor network. And I know that 100K // 1M = 91K... And I also know that with 1uF you have a nice low corner frequency when the caps just ''see'' 91K instead of the resistor network.This is not what I'm talking about.

I'm talking about loading your triode on the output. Sorry again, I don't have the words to explain in English, but try to look up a data-sheet on a 2A3. Depending on the voltages on the tube the load on the output should be in around 3 - 6kohm or so (if memory serves me correct, I have not seen one of these data sheets for many years). If you don't load the triodes correctly you will not be in the tubes linear operating range and distortion will be high... I'm quite sure that the designers have choosen the values of the resistors in the network on the output to get the triodes in their most linear range with the voltages for the tubes in the Tram II. Now you load the triodes with 91K ohm, and I don't think this is that good...

Morten, you are referring to the anode load for the 2A3. The 2A3 has a plate impedance of around 800 ohms, therefore would like to see a load of more than 2.5 times or 3 times this as a minimum, hence the classic SE OTX of 2K5 for the 2A3. This requirement is to avoid excessive distortion, and anything above this tends to lower distortion as the load line rotates and becomes flatter on the curves. It is suggested by many that the ideal is an infinitely high load, such that the load line becomes horizontal, which is what a choke load, CCS etc all try to replicate.

In the Tram2 the 2A3 anode load is the 6AS7 and CCS "Super mu" stage producing a v v high impedance load, instead of a 2K5 resistor (for example), the dynamic load seen by the 2A3 is then this anode load impedance (v v high) in parallel with the load applied across the output, i.e. the output resistors and the input of the power amp.

The basic design is setup such that the "worst case scenario", as listed in the specs, is a power amp with 5K0 input impedance, when we will have the 2A3 presented with 3K780 in parallel with 5K470 which is about 2K235, about as low as you want a 2A3 to go, and hence the 12u2 output capacitors for a 5.8Hz corner frequency, and overall a nicely setup situation to meet the needs of driving a 5K0 input power amplifier :)

In my view the risk is to go lower than this, not to go higher.

With the 1M0 output resistor the 2A3 will just be seeing a higher impedance load, so the dynamic load line will be closer to horizontal, I am happy with this.
 
It's fine sjs, if you're happy with it all is good :) I know what you're saying, and I understand all you say (I have worked with electronics for 30 years), I just don't have the words in English to discuss this... So I rest my case on the technical stuff...

Our experience here is just, that the load these type of triodes ''see'' on their output has big impact on the sound and that they need this load on a few K ohm to sound their best. Your experience is different, and that's fine, and with you approach the output caps are cheaper ;)
 
Last edited:
Im glad to see the Tram is working for most of you - mine blew up after 6 hours of use (but it was 6 hours of great sound..:)

Anyway - it`s been a long journey in locating the fault, and I think I (with the help of an technician) that the Universal all Film Capacitor Power Supply board (FCPSU) is defect.

It is however impossible to get a new FCPSU-board from DIYhifisupply. My order from November 2012 was finally cancelled 3 months ago due to inability to supply new FCPSU-boards.

In the meantime my technician seems to have located the fault on the FCPSU-board. This is what he wrote to diyhifisupply:

"The problem is that the +B voltage from the FCPSU is missing - Thinking that Q3 is defective - this is a version 2 board. - With C1 and C2 still in place and R4 is 47 Kohm. D9 is also mounted. Could you inform me the type no. of Q3 - thanks!

There has been no answer, so i am turning to you in hope that one of you has the type number of Q3 on the FCPSU version 2...

Anyone ?

Best Wishes from Denmark

Carsten
 
Last edited:
Please remember to upgrade the cap + resistor on the Rod Coleman modules, it gives a nice improvement for little money and is so much easier to do before the modules are installed, than after...

Oh... it's a little late for that, the regs are already installed...:( What parts did you use?


The Duelund Alexander's has a slightly warmer and slightly less transparent sound compared to the more expensive models

Even with the partsconnection sale on CASTs, they are still out of my price range. Maybe in future, i will start saving my pennies...;)

Personally I prefer the Shinkoh tantalium resistors over the AN, but all tantaliums are really nice.

So i am told, but unfortunately i could not source Shinkos with the correct values - at least not from partsconnection! (I am doing this in a bit of a rush while my Tram2 is still with a competent technician: my soldering skills are woeful, particularly as i often have shaky hands. Not good at all for soldering small components!)

.. Also IMHO the Obbligato tinfoils are better than the Mundorf supremes for output caps

Thanks for that Morten: I did some research and have now cancelled the Mundorfs from my order!:p

Besides the Philips rectifier, what kind of tubes will you be using..!? :)

I have EML 45s, but as yet only the cheap Chinese 6AS7... still not sure what to replace that with... are those Cunninghams available?

- richard
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.