Hi both ...
I think R2 and R7 are correct. 102 both reads which is 1000. Could also be 200 but I reckon this is not likely ;-) ... The only ideas I get is if you have checked all the via plate throughs for connection; if R3 and R5 may be interchanged (no values shown - same color); or if the IC may be rotated 180 degrees. Otherwise I have no further suggestions ...
Jesper
I think R2 and R7 are correct. 102 both reads which is 1000. Could also be 200 but I reckon this is not likely ;-) ... The only ideas I get is if you have checked all the via plate throughs for connection; if R3 and R5 may be interchanged (no values shown - same color); or if the IC may be rotated 180 degrees. Otherwise I have no further suggestions ...
Jesper
The resistors are the correct value. Also the blue ones are on the correct spot. I keep all components in the labeled mouser bags and take them out one by one while soldering. The ic has the same orientation as on the other pcb (that is regulating correctly).
I was thinking that I might have some shorts due to solder flux sitting below the components but when measuring the resistors there is no indication of a short. The pcb is cleaned with alcohol.
I was thinking that I might have some shorts due to solder flux sitting below the components but when measuring the resistors there is no indication of a short. The pcb is cleaned with alcohol.
Check rather R4, as the component is bigger than the pad itself. It is hard to solder it properly in this situation.
The resistor shall be one physical size smaller. (0805 instead of 1206)
I used smd solder flux, no low temperature solder. The input resistor gets really hot that is why I took it off.
I changed the sensing resistor for a new one, still running hot.
I will double check the resistors.
Regards,
@Andrea, is there any news on the development of the clock boards for the bigger sc-cut crystals?
I have a pair of crystals waiting to go into service anxiously
Ps. I still have not found time and the energy to solve my oven problem
PCB prototype is on the way.
Let me know about the oven as soon as you do more test.
Any update?
Maybe a christmas present for us?
Time for testing, please be patient and stay tuned!
Andrea
When the crystal makes the difference
This is the first measurement of the new oscillator prototype with the Laptech SC 3rd overtone crystal at 5.6448 MHz.
The plot compares the phase noise performance of the new oscillator (green plot) against the Crystek CCHD-957 at 22.5792 MHz (blue plot) and a custom made OCXO from HCD at 11.2896 MHz (pink plot).
The Crystek was powered by Lifepo4 battery supply, while the other 2 oscillators was powered by standard regulators (this explains the spurs in the plot).
There is still improvement margin, since the power supply is not the best (to be measured with Lifepo4 batteries), it was measured on the fly in air without any shielding box, there isn't an oven.
Hope this was a Christmas gift.
Andrea
This is the first measurement of the new oscillator prototype with the Laptech SC 3rd overtone crystal at 5.6448 MHz.
The plot compares the phase noise performance of the new oscillator (green plot) against the Crystek CCHD-957 at 22.5792 MHz (blue plot) and a custom made OCXO from HCD at 11.2896 MHz (pink plot).
The Crystek was powered by Lifepo4 battery supply, while the other 2 oscillators was powered by standard regulators (this explains the spurs in the plot).
There is still improvement margin, since the power supply is not the best (to be measured with Lifepo4 batteries), it was measured on the fly in air without any shielding box, there isn't an oven.
Hope this was a Christmas gift.
Andrea
Attachments
- Status
- Not open for further replies.