The Well Tempered Master Clock - Building a low phase noise/jitter crystal oscillator

Status
Not open for further replies.
You just connect the input of the output buffer straight to the hold capacitor, no need for extra switches.

Gate and capacitor oxide leakage can be very small when the oxide is thick enough, otherwise EPROMs and flash memories couldn't work. You could also keep the PMOS biased slightly on to make its resistance more predictable and process- and temperature-independent. To get a cut-off frequency below 1 Hz with a capacitance that still fits on chip, say 100 pF, you need an on resistance of at least 1.6 Gohm. You get that in weak inversion at the same VGS that would give a saturation drain current of at most 16 pA.
 
Last edited:
Packaging and connections

Some solutions I’m exploring. I strapped the clock and a doubler together with the tops of the cases compressing a conformal pad. This stops any vibration of the lids and dampens the whole unit quite nicely. Added special soft feet to the edge so that the actual xtall rests in an on edge, rather than flat orientation surrounded by foam inside to stabilize air currents and thus temperature. In the next picture a Twisted Pear Cronus was assembled in inverted order such that the Cronus board is on top. I also mounted the jumpers on the bottom to provide unobstructed mounting of the squaring circuitry. The sound is so wonderful that I haven’t moved it from the actual breadboard into a case yet.

Sorry I don’t know how to rotate pictures.
977C605F-E83F-4E1F-AF55-6449857D7A85.jpg
826AE2EA-C686-44F2-9863-817021161684.jpg
 
No sand in the boxes? Too bad, that would definitely improve the sound.

Sand from the Kalahari desert has a special sonic signature and it is highly recommended. No Nevada, Mururoa atoll or Kazakhstan sand, that could be slightly radioactive and affect the sound by ionizing the air between the sand grains.

Maybe the sand of the Kalahari desert could even improves your oscillator.
You should give it a try.
 
No sand in the boxes? Too bad, that would definitely improve the sound. /QUOTE]
I am happy to try real suggestions, that is actually give them a listen. Ears are both the most sensitive tools that I own and the ones that really matter to me. Have you actually tried filling the box with sand? I would be potentially concerned about both salt and metallic impurities in most sand. Finely ground and washed quartz crystals would provide a nice rf blocking and have been beneficially applied in a few commercial and scientific implimentations. Still I believe you are referring to filling another box that surrounds the clock boxes with sand, not having the sand in contact with the inductors and circuit traces.

Syn08, would you be willing to share pictures and descriptions of your implementation of the clocks? Have you made any measurements of anything that does affect the clocks performance, that could be inexpensively explored by those of us interested in this hobby? Sarcasm is fun when not mean spirited but I for one am here to share insights with fellow audio enthusiasts. To learn from others explorations and to work together toward ever improving our enjoyment of music by refining our audio reproduction equipment. I also have made no claim that anything I have done has unambiguously improved the actual or subjective performance of the clocks. First principle extrapolation would suggest reducing external vibration, minimizing temperature variation, shortening wiring paths all could be beneficial and would at least not be detrimental.
 
Result is good, easily sounds better to me than using I2SoverUSB clocks. However, my dac chip needs 22/24MHz clocks, so I used a frequency multiplier chip to produce the 45/49 MHz clocks needed by I2SoverUSB. Then I reclock I2S signals coming out of I2SoverUSB to attenuate any jitter caused by the frequency multiplier. Also, I found that using Andrea's clocks at 11/12 Mhz (along with Andrea's frequency doublers) produced slightly better sounding (to me) 22/24MHz master clocks, as opposed to earlier having tried Andrea's clocks directly with 22/24 Mhz crystals.
 
Last edited:
I am interested in this mod as well. I was considering to feed Andreas clock via the external oscillator board and STS but the high frequency rate 45/49 made me discard it, I just have the 5/6 and two doublers. However I didn´t know that frequency could be changed after a firmware update, would it be possible to use 11/12??

Actually I wanted to mod the usb hub controller using the 24Mhz external clock (NS3) of my usb card but I think it is SMSL USB3317 that uses 26Mhz, so no go....
 
Could someone describe what is meant by I2S over usb? I thought that usb had its own clock and that audio stream(s) were packeted to travel over it. I have experience with a usb to I2S converter that derives its audio clocks from the usb master clock. Yes improving the usb clock made a difference, but switching to a fifo or an amenero that could be fed external audio master clock sounded far superior to any improvement in the usb clock, while rendering such improvements to the usb clock moot.
 
Hi Andrea,

is there a reason why you are using a buffered 74AC04 inverter in the TWTMC-STS? I swapped it for a 74LVCU04 and the output signal looks much better with it.

Yes, we have used the 74AC04 because it has the best phase noise performance.
We have tried almost all logic families and the AC was 10-15 dB better.
And not all the brands, TI and On-Semi devices have worse phase noise than the brand we have used.

Although someone think that the beaty of the waveform is crucial, it has nothing to do with the phase noise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.