Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Amp chip comparison ES9601K vs TPA6120A2
Amp chip comparison ES9601K vs TPA6120A2
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th April 2019, 09:24 AM   #1
huipark is offline huipark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Post Amp chip comparison ES9601K vs TPA6120A2

Hello

Please tell me which amp chip ES9601K and TPA6120A2 is better?

Thank you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2019, 09:07 AM   #2
sgrossklass is offline sgrossklass  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Germany
Apples and oranges, really.

The ES9601K comes in a tiny QFN package and probably runs on +3.3 V (or +5 V), or at least that's what I'd infer from 2 Vrms with an internal charge pump negative supply. The product page says nothing about it being Class G/H (like the Maxim ones would be), even though this would probably be a good idea given the limited thermal capabilities of such a small package. This would be the kind of chip to use in a portable player or smartphone.

The TPA6120A2 originally derives from a DSL line driver. It operates on a traditional bipolar power supply from +/-5 V up to +/-15 V, delivering anywhere from ~1.4 to 8.5 Vrms (so up to 18 times the power into high-impedance headphones). As power dissipation can be over a watt, an exposed power pad on the bottom of the package is used to transfer the heat away from the chip (if you can't solder that, you can always turn the chip upside down and put a heatsink on top). Minimum advisable load impedance for this guy is probably 64 ohms, performance tends to suffer below that. Applications often use 10 ohms of output impedance to get stability in check.

Note that both basically are drivers only. In addition, them directly following a DAC as suggested in documentation will require said DAC to be very well implemented, with excellent real-life performance, if you want to avoid excessive output noise. The 117 dB of the ES9601K may still be somewhat realistic, but getting close to the 128 dB(A) of the TPA6120A2 is very likely to require an analog volume control and opamp buffer / gain stage (note that gain structure is likely to be different between solutions involving a volume pot or a PGA).
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Amp chip comparison ES9601K vs TPA6120A2Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TPA6120A2 Headphone amp or better? mark31385 Chip Amps 35 22nd April 2016 01:15 PM
Looking for TPA6120A2 Odysei Swap Meet 1 2nd June 2007 08:49 PM
Designing a simple TPA6120A2 Amp cynric Chip Amps 8 6th March 2007 08:57 AM
Interesting comparison elec. v. poly caps + new chip info FastEddy Solid State 0 20th September 2006 04:39 PM
PCM2902 + TPA6120A2 schematic Nabetse Chip Amps 2 5th October 2005 04:43 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2019 diyAudio
Wiki