Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Modulus-86  build thread
Modulus-86  build thread
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd February 2018, 12:10 AM   #3841
tomchr is offline tomchr  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
tomchr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Probably about 175 W into 8 Ω. With the linear supply, the rail voltage does droop a bit at the higher output power, so you won't quite make it to 200 W.

Math says 330 VA is enough for 4 Ω for music reproduction. I'd need to measure the output power in that case to give a number.

Boy... I really need to get off the pot and start that MOD686 vendor thread. Stay tuned.

Tom
__________________
Modulus-86, 186, 286, & 686: 40-240W (8Ω) at <-120dB THD. HP-1: 3W/20Ω, -130dB THD, 128dB DNR.
Neurochrome : : Audio - www.neurochrome.com - Engineering : : Done : : Right
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 12:30 AM   #3842
billshurv is offline billshurv  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
billshurv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Modulus-86  build thread
Having the power needs discussion here is good. Means I can wind up Tom for all his posts about NOT needing huge power .

Did look again at ROM figures for how much power the next evolution of my speakers will need. I was going to have a stack of 4 faital pro 6FE100 open baffle on each side. A solid 90dB/w over the range I am using them, so 4 gives equivalent of 96dB/w. Rickie lee jones 'ghetto of my mind' at an average of 85dB* would need a massive 25w to handle the peaks with this setup. Roll in the EQ I would need between 120 and 80Hz to deal with the baffle and we would be knocking on the door of 100W. A 286 per side on bass duty driving a paralleled pair of drivers would be just about perfect for that. And much louder that I am normally allowed to listen at.

*The dimensions of the room mean that, for a first approximation, 85dBa out of each speaker equates to 85dBa at listening position.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 01:47 AM   #3843
nyt is offline nyt
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomchr View Post
Probably about 175 W into 8 Ω. With the linear supply, the rail voltage does droop a bit at the higher output power, so you won't quite make it to 200 W.

Math says 330 VA is enough for 4 Ω for music reproduction. I'd need to measure the output power in that case to give a number.

Boy... I really need to get off the pot and start that MOD686 vendor thread. Stay tuned.

Tom
Do you have any power supply recommendations for the 686?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 02:00 AM   #3844
tomchr is offline tomchr  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
tomchr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
36 V SMPS if you want to break 200 W. Two Mean Well RPS-400-36 may be the ticket. I think that's what I'll try for a mono build. I'm currently using two RS-600-36 for the testing. Those are great in the lab but their fans are super loud. The RPS-400-series does not have a fan.

2x25 VAC @ 350-500 VA feeding a Power-86 will max out around 175 W as I recall.

Tom
__________________
Modulus-86, 186, 286, & 686: 40-240W (8Ω) at <-120dB THD. HP-1: 3W/20Ω, -130dB THD, 128dB DNR.
Neurochrome : : Audio - www.neurochrome.com - Engineering : : Done : : Right
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 02:09 AM   #3845
tomchr is offline tomchr  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
tomchr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Quote:
Originally Posted by billshurv View Post
Having the power needs discussion here is good. Means I can wind up Tom for all his posts about NOT needing huge power .
Well. Don't forget that for quite a while I was arguing that the BPA topology was morally inferior. That's another of my chains that you can yank...

I'd still argue that the applications engineers at National missed the mark with the BPA200. It's not bad, but could be improved. It will drive an 8 Ω load just fine but will run out of steam with a 4 Ω load. If you want to drive a 4 Ω load, you really need to use six LM3886es. You can see my rationale here: Taming the LM3886 - Output Power.
There's also an interesting little quirk in the BPA200 design. If the negative supply starts up before the positive, the amp will latch up. It will draw a lot of current for a few seconds until it recovers and starts up. With a current limited supply, that's no big deal, but with two SMPSes with different startup times capable of delivering 16+ A, that could mean trouble. In most implementations you'd never notice. I found it by coincidence in the lab. That's why the final version of the Modulus-686 board contains a few extra components to make sure that the amp is shut down if the imbalance between the positive and negative supply is greater than 4-5 V.

Of course, I then went ahead and took the BPA topology to a whole new performance level with the differential composite topology. I've attached the block diagram of the '686 so you can see what the topology looks like.

Tom
Attached Images
File Type: png MOD686_BlockDiagram.png (153.2 KB, 290 views)
__________________
Modulus-86, 186, 286, & 686: 40-240W (8Ω) at <-120dB THD. HP-1: 3W/20Ω, -130dB THD, 128dB DNR.
Neurochrome : : Audio - www.neurochrome.com - Engineering : : Done : : Right

Last edited by tomchr; 3rd February 2018 at 02:17 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 07:27 AM   #3846
HarmonicTHD is offline HarmonicTHD  Switzerland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomchr View Post
Probably about 175 W into 8 Ω. With the linear supply, the rail voltage does droop a bit at the higher output power, so you won't quite make it to 200 W.

Math says 330 VA is enough for 4 Ω for music reproduction. I'd need to measure the output power in that case to give a number.

Boy... I really need to get off the pot and start that MOD686 vendor thread. Stay tuned.

Tom
Thanks that will do with my current speakers.

What if I would upgrade my speakers let’s say to these ones
KEF Reference 5 loudspeaker Measurements | Stereophile.com
with a impendance of 4 over a wide range and dropping down to 3ohms. Would a 686 be able to handle this with the right powersupply?
How many amps can the 686 supply? I remember a single LM3886 is around 7 to 11A?

Last edited by HarmonicTHD; 3rd February 2018 at 07:32 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 02:32 PM   #3847
Studley is online now Studley  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Riding of Yorkshire, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomchr View Post
36 V SMPS if you want to break 200 W. Two Mean Well RPS-400-36 may be the ticket. I think that's what I'll try for a mono build. I'm currently using two RS-600-36 for the testing. Those are great in the lab but their fans are super loud. The RPS-400-series does not have a fan.

2x25 VAC @ 350-500 VA feeding a Power-86 will max out around 175 W as I recall.

Tom
Tom
The received wisdom is that SMPS' are bad news for audio applications because they spray lots of noise inducing radiation around. By implication it seems like you have a different view?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 03:02 PM   #3848
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
Not in my experience. We could compare data though. I went through the process of necessary for certification using switching supply. The efficiency actually is a plus.
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 05:25 PM   #3849
Davey is online now Davey  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.
Tom,

If I missed it sorry. Are you raising the value (relative to other parallel configs) of the ballasting resistors with the 686 configuration?

Dave.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2018, 05:47 PM   #3850
tomchr is offline tomchr  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
tomchr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Quote:
Originally Posted by Studley View Post
The received wisdom is that SMPS' are bad news for audio applications because they spray lots of noise inducing radiation around.
That was probably true back in the 1970ies or 1980ies when the switching supplies were these fancy new things made with leaded components and their associated large loop areas (think large radiating antennae). Modern supplies use SMD components for a number of reasons, including smaller size and, thus, lower loop areas and lower emissions. Circuit designers understand the EMI problem a lot better now and are designing the circuits to be as gentle on the surrounding environment as possible. Modern supplies are also subject to a range of regulations regarding emissions, both those conducted back onto the mains and those emitted to surrounding circuitry.

The Mean Well RPS-400-36 that I am thinking to recommend for the MOD686 is a medical switcher which meets a wide range of EMI standards and safety standards. If it's good enough for life-saving equipment, I'm thinking it's good enough for your audio amplifier...
Note that the signals measured for EKG and EEG, for example, are in the uV range. Those systems would be much more sensitive to any supply-related EMI and the medical switchers work fine there.

Also note that the performance plots I've shown so far have all been measured with an SMPS. I am seeing the same performance with a Power-86 and an Antek AN-5225 power transformer, except the max output power is about 175 W rather than the 220 W you get with the SMPS. That's due to the rail voltage droop of the linear supply.
My measurements are done on the lab bench. I don't do anything special to keep the setup shielded, so what you see is about worst case for EMI.

Now, I'm not saying that all SMPSes are created equal. I definitely encourage you to read the data sheets before buying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by soongsc View Post
Not in my experience. We could compare data though. I went through the process of necessary for certification using switching supply. The efficiency actually is a plus.
I agree. The cost tends to be lower too. The exception to this is in the US, where the low-cost Antek transformers tend to make the linear supplies slightly less expensive than a comparable SMPS. International builders will likely find the SMPSes to be lower cost. Many SMPSes have auto-sensing inputs and are compatible with the mains voltages world wide. That greatly simplifies the mains wiring.
The RPS-400-series from Mean Well takes this a step further by offering a +5 V standby voltage and low-voltage power-on. It would be trivial to design a small board that would allow for low-voltage switching of the supply. This would mean that the builder would connect the mains voltage from the IEC inlet to the SMPS and that's it. All other wiring is handled on the low-voltage side.

Note that the RPS-400 comes in a 27 V flavour as well. You can dial it up to 28 V. That's perfect for a Modulus-86.

Tom
__________________
Modulus-86, 186, 286, & 686: 40-240W (8Ω) at <-120dB THD. HP-1: 3W/20Ω, -130dB THD, 128dB DNR.
Neurochrome : : Audio - www.neurochrome.com - Engineering : : Done : : Right
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Modulus-86  build threadHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modulus-86: Composite amplifier achieving <0.0004 % THD+N. tomchr Vendor's Bazaar 2407 12th September 2018 05:27 AM
Build Thread: OBEOS Tytte71 Multi-Way 15 1st October 2011 07:02 PM
Dome's Build Thread. joe58 Full Range 12 1st September 2010 05:05 PM
SE - Build Thread soundengine355 Solid State 6 27th June 2009 01:19 AM
New Project Build Thread ryoung Multi-Way 5 19th April 2008 02:15 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki