The Kuartlotron - keantoken's simple error-correction superbuffer

For all of us sending Paypal to 'keantoken' can you add the extra Paypal feeeeee -

So, for 2 boards it's U$8 x 2 + $2 postage = U$18 + Paypal fee approx. U$1.20 these days - not the cheapest way of paying for things but in comparison to the fees for operating a MasterCard account of even worse, sending a cheque overseas ...

I do use the cheap pcb services from China, etc and they're remarkably cheap indeed, but here I'm paying for the thinking, the circuit & the pcb design more than just the boards

We all like getting paid for our work, even if it just pays the cost ....
 
Thanks for pointing that out James.

Common questions about the boards:

1: The boards need a +-10V PSU. For trimming you want a regulated supply, but you can still use a simple PSU if the ripple is under 20mV or so.

2: Each board is one channel, so you need a pair for stereo.

3: Bom will be made shortly. Some quick notes on construction:
a: Component values are shown on the PCB.
b: It accepts screw terminal inputs and outputs.
c: Transistors on left are BC560C (PNP), Transistors on right are BC550C (NPN).
d: Use either an inductor, or bridge the solder link in the upper right to use the PCB inductor.
e: Set the trimmers to the values shown on the PCB before soldering them, or just use resistors of those values in the outer vias.
f: Match the screw on the trimmers with the screw on the silkscreen, ignore the CW pin. Otherwise the turning direction will be reversed.
 
I've tried various inductors with it in the past and didn't notice a big difference unless I used one too large. It will still sound good even if you don't use an inductor at all. My audio system isn't in the best condition for sensitive tests right now so I haven't tried it. In any case, I don't think what I hear in my system can speak for everyone, so I don't give too much weight to personal tests.
 
20160718_204039.jpg


Heatshrink worked really well to thermally couple the TO-92 transistors.

I'm trying the onboard inductor even though I have a couple other ones. I used a piece of lead to bridge them because I found my kester 44 didn't want to without a massive glob.
 
My experience

I have built the first Keanotokens Kuartlotron in January this year. I liked the sound very much so I decided to build it one more time with better power supply and better parts.
My present reference preamp is based on Erno Borbely module EB325. I have bought it from Erno few years ago. Erno made it and tested by himself and then he sent it to me. Together with Salas voltage shunt regulator as a power supply I use it for many years.
Since that time I have tested about 4 another preamps but I always concluded that EB325 sound is better than any other preamp.
Since I have excellent experience with Salas voltage shunt regulator I decided to use it together with Kuartlotron too. Here is the result.
Salas+Kean1.JPG

Salas+Kean2.JPG
 
As you could see I use as a basic power supply two SMPS. They are 24V/15W modules from Mean Well. I have bought it from Mouser.
Then the voltage is regulated by Slalas regs and it is used as a power supply for 4 Kuartlotron modules. In this time I use only two modules.
The sound:
The sound is really excellent. I had a prejudice that only JFET input transistors could do the work properly. All my previous experience was showing that the bipolars at the input do not sound good. But this time it is different. There is absence of any kind of aggresiveness and the low level details are more pleasant then in my reference preamp from Erno Borbely. Beside this the sound is really musical and full of joy and far away from opamp preams I have ever heard.
For the completeness, my system: CD player/DAC Audiolab 8200CD, Kuartlotron vs. EB325 as preamps, HYPA 17 power amp, Ellam flex 3W speakers, ClearAudio interconnects and Chord Odyssey 2 speaker cables.

Ladislav
 
Received your boards, nice and tiny! That was quick, thank you!

One question: In your paper about the Kuartlotron you write that Q1 should be thermally coupled to Q3, and Q2 to Q4. On your boards the transistors are not arranged like that. What did I miss here?
 
Good to hear you are having good results lgabco.

The capacitance isn't critical as long as it fits the pad.

The benefits of the alternate coupling are theoretical, the board is designed like my prototype which I used for all the testing. Either way works.
 
Last edited:
While waiting for some "boutique" parts to arrive (I know they are not really necessary, but...) I would like to ask you guys for your experience with input potentiometers: I want to use no coupling capacitors if possible. Will there be any significant offset change if I - say - connect a 10k pot and change R8 to - say -100k?