M-AUDIO - MobilePre - Record Music with Your Computer
they make one higher if you need better
If you need higher rez but just single channel check out their transit
http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Transit.html
they make one higher if you need better
If you need higher rez but just single channel check out their transit
http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Transit.html
Last edited:
You will be further ahead looking at Firewire interfaces. I can recommend this one from personal experience:
EDIROL FA-66 24Bit/192kHz FireWire Audio Capture
dave
EDIROL FA-66 24Bit/192kHz FireWire Audio Capture
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
dave
Thanks for the answers.
However, these models have standard specifications:
input dynamic range: 100dB (typical, -60dB input, A-weighted)
signal-to-noise ratio: 100dB (typical, A-weighted)
In order to evaluate the specifications of other sounds cards and mp3 players,
I would need to have much higher measures than these standard ones.
Is there any other product that I could use?
Regards,
David
However, these models have standard specifications:
input dynamic range: 100dB (typical, -60dB input, A-weighted)
signal-to-noise ratio: 100dB (typical, A-weighted)
In order to evaluate the specifications of other sounds cards and mp3 players,
I would need to have much higher measures than these standard ones.
Is there any other product that I could use?
Regards,
David
You will be further ahead looking at Firewire interfaces. I can recommend this one from personal experience:
EDIROL FA-66 24Bit/192kHz FireWire Audio Capture
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
dave
Dave, can you post basline RMAA measurements of this unit, with no DUT connected?
From my tests, it doesn't perform as well as say a E-MU 0404 USB.
For me, the best in USB
USBPre 2 Microphone Interface for Computer Audio | Sound Devices, LLC
USBPre 2 Microphone Interface for Computer Audio | Sound Devices, LLC
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Is someone says "DUT test" or "DUT testing" or "what DUT are you testing" i will reach across the internet with my soldering iron.
Sorry i just have a test at work that literally says "Please do not touch the DUT testing please".
Ok some one else can vent about hot water heaters now.
Sorry i just have a test at work that literally says "Please do not touch the DUT testing please".
Ok some one else can vent about hot water heaters now.
Dave, can you post basline RMAA measurements of this unit, with no DUT connected?
From my tests, it doesn't perform as well as say a E-MU 0404 USB.
If i knew what you were asking i might be able to respond (but the answer is probably no)
Does the EMU fo 24/192?
dave
Yes it does (24/192) and can even do 32 bit measurements.
Not in practise (at least for me): "Macintosh analog operation up to 96kHz and digital operation up to 48kHz only at this time."
It does 32 bit internal processing with 24 bit I/O. I expect that that is pretty common as it is the most sensible way to use the 32bit wide processors.
dave
So, the Edirol uses CS5340 ADC and AK4385 DAC.
The E-MU 0404 uses AK5385A ADC and AK4396 DAC
The specs just looking at the datasheet shows what's theoretically possible.
E-MU 0404 in 32/96
E-MU 0404 in 24/96
Edirol FA66 (I cannot find my graphs for this one, but these are within +-0.2dB of what I remember, despite the sampling rate difference:
The E-MU 0404 uses AK5385A ADC and AK4396 DAC
The specs just looking at the datasheet shows what's theoretically possible.
E-MU 0404 in 32/96

E-MU 0404 in 24/96

Edirol FA66 (I cannot find my graphs for this one, but these are within +-0.2dB of what I remember, despite the sampling rate difference:

- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Design & Build
- Equipment & Tools
- usb audio interface