Has anyone been using the ZLS woofers or the new woofers from Peerless ?
How do they compare to Scanspeak and Dynaudio ?
http://www.d-s-t.com/link/peerless/data/830884.htm
http://www.d-s-t.com/link/peerless/data/830452.htm
How do they compare to Scanspeak and Dynaudio ?
http://www.d-s-t.com/link/peerless/data/830884.htm
http://www.d-s-t.com/link/peerless/data/830452.htm
I presume you are refering to the XLS drivers of peerless and not the ZLS.
Well I use the XLS in my system and like them a lot.
The application they can be used in is however somewhat limited in comparison to eton/scan/dyn.
The XLS have breakup around 500hz which you want to avoid like the plague, so low crossovers are required. Dont really take one above 150hz. The other makes will go much higher, probably up to atleast 500hz.
The XLS and XXLS range are really subwoofer drivers rather then bass drivers. Three ways you see with them in use a mid/bass driver rather then a dedicated midrange which usually need to be crossed over around 300hz, here scans or etons make sense. Eton make an 11" bass driver I think that is very highly regarded with its hexacone technology.
Well I use the XLS in my system and like them a lot.
The application they can be used in is however somewhat limited in comparison to eton/scan/dyn.
The XLS have breakup around 500hz which you want to avoid like the plague, so low crossovers are required. Dont really take one above 150hz. The other makes will go much higher, probably up to atleast 500hz.
The XLS and XXLS range are really subwoofer drivers rather then bass drivers. Three ways you see with them in use a mid/bass driver rather then a dedicated midrange which usually need to be crossed over around 300hz, here scans or etons make sense. Eton make an 11" bass driver I think that is very highly regarded with its hexacone technology.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.