-look to low Qe drivers.. doesn't really matter about the manufacturer (in this respect).
Ex.
https://www.parts-express.com/pedocs/specs/296-440-aurum-cantus-ac12050ck-specifications.pdf
Of course any horn should be designed for the particular driver. ..and in the case of a BLH that typically includes some measure of baffle-step support. IF however the driver has some lower-mid. gain (typically 150 - 300 Hz), then you have less to worry about (..or you could just go the route of baffle-step compensation).
additionally, lower Qm can lower the effect of the horn/(resonant t-line) on the driver and reduce non-linearity. (..this is a "tail-wagging-the-dog" effect, with the "dog" being the driver.)
Ex.
https://www.parts-express.com/pedocs/specs/296-440-aurum-cantus-ac12050ck-specifications.pdf
Of course any horn should be designed for the particular driver. ..and in the case of a BLH that typically includes some measure of baffle-step support. IF however the driver has some lower-mid. gain (typically 150 - 300 Hz), then you have less to worry about (..or you could just go the route of baffle-step compensation).
additionally, lower Qm can lower the effect of the horn/(resonant t-line) on the driver and reduce non-linearity. (..this is a "tail-wagging-the-dog" effect, with the "dog" being the driver.)
Last edited:
Actually, not too much. But a 135 Hz front loaded horn is of course much better. It would work somehow, I need to measure the 8PE21 with and without the H6000 horn. It is not intended for this application anyway, I just wonder if it would work somehow
So the answer is it most probably would, but nothing to be excited about.
..a 135 Hz front loaded horn is of course much better.

It's often about minimizing audible phase-delay; the lower in freq. for the rear-horn's contribution the better.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Midbass in a Backloaded Horn