I have not tested, but based on the datasheet, it should work fine.
For 1 mA use 1k2 resistor between Vout and Adj. pins.
For 1 mA use 1k2 resistor between Vout and Adj. pins.
Be careful, the PSRR (power supply ripple rejection) only 60db!
I think that is the problem .
Other IC regulators.
https://www.google.es/search?site=&...0....0...1.2.64.psy-ab..2.1.190.0.OnU_sGqbs2M
Cheers
You'll be ok @1m the safe operating area of the LR8N3 is 0.74W in the TO-92 package. Working the math backwards Vin-Vout for 10mA = 74V
Higher PSRR -- DN2540N3G, or a pair of them will make you a source with MegOhm impedance. SOA bounded by 1W. It's also TO-92, cost is $0.78 vs $0.64 for the LR8N3. See the second in Walt's series on current sources.
Supertex is now owned by Microchip, Mouser carries.
Higher PSRR -- DN2540N3G, or a pair of them will make you a source with MegOhm impedance. SOA bounded by 1W. It's also TO-92, cost is $0.78 vs $0.64 for the LR8N3. See the second in Walt's series on current sources.
Supertex is now owned by Microchip, Mouser carries.
Be careful, the PSRR (power supply ripple rejection) only 60db!
Seriously ?
Usually a 100k...220k resistor is used at the anode of 12AX7 and is fine for most cases..
How much would the PSRR be with those resistors ?
You'll be ok @1m the safe operating area of the LR8N3 is 0.74W in the TO-92 package. Working the math backwards Vin-Vout for 10mA = 74V
Higher PSRR -- DN2540N3G, or a pair of them will make you a source with MegOhm impedance. SOA bounded by 1W. It's also TO-92, cost is $0.78 vs $0.64 for the LR8N3. See the second in Walt's series on current sources.
Supertex is now owned by Microchip, Mouser carries.
In the end the usually cascode.
Other option: the LND150, maybe?
Thanks.
> Usually a 100k...220k resistor is used at the anode of 12AX7 ... How much would the PSRR be with those resistors ?
Without looking, say 6dB.
Knowing some about the situation, as much as -9dB.
As a general thing, the B+ to a volt-amp stage should be clean enough to listen to, "silent", at the signal level and subsequent gain of that plate.
If you want to cheap-out, you can let B+ racket be a little higher R-loaded, much higher with a stiff CCS. OTOH a good CCS is about as many parts as a good voltage regulator/filter, which can also drop B+ crap way down. As can simple R-C filtering.
Without looking, say 6dB.
Knowing some about the situation, as much as -9dB.
As a general thing, the B+ to a volt-amp stage should be clean enough to listen to, "silent", at the signal level and subsequent gain of that plate.
If you want to cheap-out, you can let B+ racket be a little higher R-loaded, much higher with a stiff CCS. OTOH a good CCS is about as many parts as a good voltage regulator/filter, which can also drop B+ crap way down. As can simple R-C filtering.
I find them at TME Spain. Nice prices.
Cheers
A correction my tarzan-english
LR8 is more or less a high voltage LM317 and I suspect this , like the LM317 , will not make a particularly good CCS
Try LND150 instead , this should be ideal for a 1mA CCS load
316a
Try LND150 instead , this should be ideal for a 1mA CCS load
316a
LR8 is more or less a high voltage LM317 and I suspect this , like the LM317 , will not make a particularly good CCS
Try LND150 instead , this should be ideal for a 1mA CCS load
316a
The LM317 makes an excellent CCS IMHO. Even Broskie says so.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- LR8N3 as load anode CCS