There is such a lot of fuss about interconnects, capacitance and gold plated etc I thought 5m would at least be five times the trouble.Why do you think its horrible?
Thanks billshurvDon't believe everything you read! Unless there is something badly wrong somewhere or you live next to Wrotham or Crystal Palace nothing nasty will happen. Use good quality screened coax and avoid any snake oily stuff. You think of all the systems you see with meaty mighty monster monoblocks next to the speakers, they often have 5m+ interconnects. You are running at 2VRMS out from the streamer so it'll be fine.
Or get the iPhone app for your NP30!
Hello
Problem is my cambridge audio np30 streamer is too far away for me to read,as its next to the amp.
I would like to bring the np30 nearer to me and use a 5m rca cable to go to the amp . I know its a horrible idea but is it deadly horrible.
Thanks
thyristor44
[1] "Firstly" is equivalent to "Secondly" … since if an amplifier has low impedance output and it amplifies, then it must also have substantial current drive. They're the same.
Just saying
GoatGuy
[2] The Zsource → Zsink ratio is only important in the sense that LO source impedance can drive LO or HI sinks, but HI source impedance can not drive LO sink impedance downwind equipment.
low output impedance does not necessarily equate to adequate current capability.Andy… you're pitching snake oil.
[1] "Firstly" is equivalent to "Secondly" … since if an amplifier has low impedance output and it amplifies, then it must also have substantial current drive. They're the same.
[2] The Zsource → Zsink ratio is only important in the sense that LO source impedance can drive LO or HI sinks, but HI source impedance can not drive LO sink impedance downwind equipment.
[2a] For instance, 600 Ω low impedance microphones can (and do) drive 600 Ω low impedance mixing board inputs … up to 50 meters or more, depending on the wire-gauge used to interconnect.
So… while your advice is fine, your attribution reasons are not.
Just saying
GoatGuy
The reason for not being able to drive the cable plus input stage is that low output impedance does not confer to ability to source adequate current to charge/discharge the capacitanes in the cable and the RF filtering usually fitted to input stages.Mmmm, you may well be factually correct with your statement, GG - but I know, for instance, that there are some preamps (which, by definition, "amplify") which have a wimpy output stage which has trouble driving long interconnects.
There was a TAS or Audiophile article in the early 80s which explained 2 things:
1) how cable capacitance affected the sound (high capacitance rolled off the highs), and
2) that the amount of roll-off was influenced by the Zout/Zin ratio (the lower the ratio ... the more capacitance influenced the amount of roll-off).
It made sense to me, so I continue to believe what the guy said.
Regards,
Andy
No they are not the same. Output impedance and current drive capability are two quite different issues. However, any competently-designed audio source should be good enough at both to drive a 5m cable.GoatGuy said:[1] "Firstly" is equivalent to "Secondly" … since if an amplifier has low impedance output and it amplifies, then it must also have substantial current drive. They're the same.
This is true, but only weakly so. Provided that Zin is much greater than Zout (almost always the case) then Zin is irrelevant.andyr said:2) that the amount of roll-off was influenced by the Zout/Zin ratio (the lower the ratio ... the more capacitance influenced the amount of roll-off).
Then there is the issue of a preamplifier's output level. 2 volts RMS is probably more than enough to drive your amplifier into clipping. So you will be sending a level of typically .1 volts RMS for enough headroom and a comfortable listening level. So a with a typical output current of even the poorest preamp chips of .01 amps that should be able to drive the input to well above clipping. It will actually not do the theoretical 100 volts as the power supply will limit the maximum signal well before that.
However such a cable can cause significant damage to your system. With a 1 or 2 meter cable they are placed behind the equipment and shielded to some extent by the equipment. With a 15 meter cable that is not possible. In most applications this cable would even rest on the floor. That is where the problems come in. You can trip over the cord and cause your connected equipment to fall to the floor and get damaged. (Gotcha!) So be sure to either tie it off to something substantial or use cable clamps to the base board to provide strain (tripping) relief.![]()
No they are not the same. Output impedance and current drive capability are two quite different issues. However, any competently-designed audio source should be good enough at both to drive a 5m cable.
plus the importance of S/N ratio due system gain distribution , claiming 2V signal over the amps input is nice but it's not what the OP has proposed.
doesn't the streamer supply the main signal attenuation, so "the amp" typical input voltage is many dB below the max. longer single ended cables carrying a smallish signal are indeed not a worry free zone. so many assumptions by a few posters here can lead to bad advice. I didn't read where "the amp" said it was "integrated" with the attenuator and whether is it cranked down to have 2V on the input?
Well now for the other side. With a 5 meter cable you can actually damage your sound system.
...
However such a cable can cause significant damage to your system. With a 1 or 2 meter cable they are placed behind the equipment and shielded to some extent by the equipment. With a 15 meter cable that is not possible. In most applications this cable would even rest on the floor. That is where the problems come in. You can trip over the cord and cause your connected equipment to fall to the floor and get damaged. (Gotcha!) So be sure to either tie it off to something substantial or use cable clamps to the base board to provide strain (tripping) relief.![]()