A few monthes ago, I listed my-diy mreclock-100 module.
This new mreclock-100 is upgraded from the diy reclock-100.
It accept optical and coaxial digital spdif input and output optical and coaxial digital spdif signal, whose zitter is reduced by the reclock function. when blind testing the sound between using coaxial and optical, then many people prefer the sound from the coaxial. how do you think?
This new mreclock-100 is upgraded from the diy reclock-100.
It accept optical and coaxial digital spdif input and output optical and coaxial digital spdif signal, whose zitter is reduced by the reclock function. when blind testing the sound between using coaxial and optical, then many people prefer the sound from the coaxial. how do you think?
Attachments
I also prefer the coaxial...
I also prefer the coaxial.
If you want to look the MREClock-100 in detail.
then I recommend to visit the site.
(http://www.digi-hifi.com/?pt=pview&st=local&pc=product&no=32)
^^
I also prefer the coaxial.
If you want to look the MREClock-100 in detail.
then I recommend to visit the site.
(http://www.digi-hifi.com/?pt=pview&st=local&pc=product&no=32)
^^
- Status
- Not open for further replies.