High Power TDA7293 IC in Parallel 555W Mono Power Amplifier Board Assembled | eBay
7*TDA7293 PARALLEL 555W
is it worth it?
i want to buy one just to analyse it with my college professor,,thats why im asking,,shoud i buy it or do you recommend me something else?
7*TDA7293 PARALLEL 555W
is it worth it?
i want to buy one just to analyse it with my college professor,,thats why im asking,,shoud i buy it or do you recommend me something else?
To get that level of power output from the specified 35V rails you'll need a fairly low impedance load, not your usual 8 or even 4 ohms. What is there to analyse?
So you mean that to gain that power I need to use 2 or less ohm at the output..analyze the difference between class D and standard transistor amplifier.
It's very simple:
Prms=(Udc)^2/(2*R)
Prms:The absolute maximum output Power you can get from a BTL Class D amp without clipping
Udc:Your DC supply Voltage(Here we have +-35V=>70V)
R:Your Speaker Impedance
It will actually be a bit less (times 0.9 or so) because of things.
Prms=(Udc)^2/(2*R)
Prms:The absolute maximum output Power you can get from a BTL Class D amp without clipping
Udc:Your DC supply Voltage(Here we have +-35V=>70V)
R:Your Speaker Impedance
It will actually be a bit less (times 0.9 or so) because of things.
True.
But that is the least of the problems.
That EBay offer is absolute nonsense design, it's ludicrous.
7 amps in parallel will demand 1/7th output impedance load, 0.57 ohms speaker in this case.
Good luck finding one.
Plus supply filtering is also wrong; they have 4 x 2200uF caps, they need 14 ... nuff said.
Just another proof that the Chinese Industrial and Commercial system is the best in the World:
**ANY** Chinese, no matter how unqualified (this "design" is proof enough) , can make any product, no matter how cheesy or poorly made and sell it to the World in exchange of good old US Dollars.
Need more proof that uneducated buyers fall for it?
It's straight in the EBay ad:
But that is the least of the problems.
That EBay offer is absolute nonsense design, it's ludicrous.
7 amps in parallel will demand 1/7th output impedance load, 0.57 ohms speaker in this case.
Good luck finding one.
Plus supply filtering is also wrong; they have 4 x 2200uF caps, they need 14 ... nuff said.
Just another proof that the Chinese Industrial and Commercial system is the best in the World:
**ANY** Chinese, no matter how unqualified (this "design" is proof enough) , can make any product, no matter how cheesy or poorly made and sell it to the World in exchange of good old US Dollars.
Need more proof that uneducated buyers fall for it?
It's straight in the EBay ad:
Last edited:
This assumption it is not correct.
Each amplifier needs to deliver only 1/7 of the loudspeaker total current.
Each amplifier needs to deliver only 1/7 of the loudspeaker total current.
Well..i just bought the L25D ..and i think i did the right thing after searching in this forum
Sent from my LG-D722 using Tapatalk
Sent from my LG-D722 using Tapatalk
"This"? Which?
1/7 of the current of 7 paralleled 4 ohm speakers, otherwise 550W will never be delivered. And you may know: 1/7x7=1...
I have done my post in response to the post made by JMFahey.
(7 amps in parallel will demand 1/7th output impedance load, 0.57 ohms speaker in this case. Good luck finding one).
(7 amps in parallel will demand 1/7th output impedance load, 0.57 ohms speaker in this case. Good luck finding one).
I know. But which "assumption"? The load impedance? It is not an assumption, but result of calculation, and your statement is not denying it. Or the difficulty of finding 0.57 ohm speaker? Why? Have you seen any?
How do you think the load can take the full power if it is not paralleled multiple speaker? Do you know the equations P=V*I, I=V/R?
Pafi,
Do not get me wrong, I'm not trying to offend you.
But I'm not willing to discuss basic theory of circuits.
Sincerely, Marcelo.
Do not get me wrong, I'm not trying to offend you.
But I'm not willing to discuss basic theory of circuits.
Sincerely, Marcelo.
As you wish. But you started (the discussion about a very basic question). The statement you denied is based on basic theory of circuits only.
Last edited:
From datasheet for those who don't like math:
(And I quess the designer of that board didn't know the difference between "several" and "seven"... 🙂 )
(And I quess the designer of that board didn't know the difference between "several" and "seven"... 🙂 )
- Status
- Not open for further replies.