Hi all DIY gurus here,
well female brains even a petite blonde LOL
sometimes are going wild. I do have lot's of brain , bon
An open baffel bass would it work with a Manger driver or
will not ?
If the answer will be a 110% NO, I do forget about.
If not, I will explain what i found digging in this forum
and why my attention made blink blink
well female brains even a petite blonde LOL
sometimes are going wild. I do have lot's of brain , bon
An open baffel bass would it work with a Manger driver or
will not ?
If the answer will be a 110% NO, I do forget about.
If not, I will explain what i found digging in this forum
and why my attention made blink blink
Well my intention has not been to make a cross post
but the Manger thread is somewhat flooded by
the idea of back loading and this will be a big, very big
folding to work. I do hat this kind of furniture.
so here it comes
digging around
found this
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/show...4139&highlight=
going down
Hi Doug,
snipp........
For even better a bargain 2 of these (per side) will set you back about the same http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...onics&n=507846.
A large baffle is a must (see pic). The PE has a nice rising response that you might be able to get away without any EQ. for "woofer" bass.
Good luck building.
cheers,
AJ
..................
I 'm ashamed, as I do know nothing about them
going on the Pyle page I'm somewhat lost
to get any information on this driver
but it sounds to good to be true
the bass open baffle would be combined with a Manger in a round dish
a simple active x over D class Amp
What will the gurus advice me about open baffle bass ????
keen to learn and get any information
but open Baffel Bass and a Manger in a round dish
sounds very attractive to me
Rose
but the Manger thread is somewhat flooded by
the idea of back loading and this will be a big, very big
folding to work. I do hat this kind of furniture.
so here it comes
digging around
found this
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/show...4139&highlight=
going down
Hi Doug,
snipp........
For even better a bargain 2 of these (per side) will set you back about the same http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...onics&n=507846.
A large baffle is a must (see pic). The PE has a nice rising response that you might be able to get away without any EQ. for "woofer" bass.
Good luck building.
cheers,
AJ
..................
I 'm ashamed, as I do know nothing about them
going on the Pyle page I'm somewhat lost
to get any information on this driver
but it sounds to good to be true
the bass open baffle would be combined with a Manger in a round dish
a simple active x over D class Amp
What will the gurus advice me about open baffle bass ????
keen to learn and get any information
but open Baffel Bass and a Manger in a round dish
sounds very attractive to me
Rose
Please help me
i did not find my dream project
as i had the chance to hear the Mangers today
and they are maybe the best........dreaming
i did not find my dream project
as i had the chance to hear the Mangers today
and they are maybe the best........dreaming
régine, could you slow down just a tab, so this old fart can catch up. Just what do you need from us? 🙂
I did found once
that this one would be good or even perfect for an open Baffel woofer
a Pyle PLG 15
any good for open baffle ??
http://www.pyleaudio.com/itemdetail.asp?model=PLG15
a car speaker
why an open Baffel woofer for a Manger ?
I do like the open airy sound and
the idea of keep it simple
the manger has to be x over not to low
minimum 500 cycles better a bit more
and to have a simple active x over
and very important not to move a heavy box around
as I'm going to China end of year and will take it there
maybe an stupid idea, but....
that this one would be good or even perfect for an open Baffel woofer
a Pyle PLG 15
any good for open baffle ??
http://www.pyleaudio.com/itemdetail.asp?model=PLG15
a car speaker
why an open Baffel woofer for a Manger ?
I do like the open airy sound and
the idea of keep it simple
the manger has to be x over not to low
minimum 500 cycles better a bit more
and to have a simple active x over
and very important not to move a heavy box around
as I'm going to China end of year and will take it there
maybe an stupid idea, but....
régine's said:
A Manger? Sorry but the only kind of "manger" I know of is one where animals are kept up out of the weather. Sorry, but I am just not understanding what you mean dear.
A Manger is a driver go down a bit in this forum you will find'em
it is a very special one but nevertheless it can't produce bass
so why not an open baffel bass
but what to use to have a reasonable output
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=47535
it is a very special one but nevertheless it can't produce bass
so why not an open baffel bass
but what to use to have a reasonable output
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=47535
John,
Manger Sound Transducer I can only assume what we are talking about here. http://www.manger-msw.com/en/produkte/index.html for more info.
And Régine, might be worth your while getting in contact with Manger direct if no one here has had any experience with an OB manger.
EDIT: Check out http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=2667
Manger Sound Transducer I can only assume what we are talking about here. http://www.manger-msw.com/en/produkte/index.html for more info.
And Régine, might be worth your while getting in contact with Manger direct if no one here has had any experience with an OB manger.
EDIT: Check out http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=2667
well she told me can be done but no idea what type of bass to mate with.
as most like boxes or backloaded
and even taking two is a bipole a perfect one
as most like boxes or backloaded
and even taking two is a bipole a perfect one
This page will give you an idea of suitable drivers:
http://www.diysubwoofers.org/dipole/
But if you want something portable, the only marginally suitable OB configuration is the 'ripole' (google for it)
http://www.diysubwoofers.org/dipole/
But if you want something portable, the only marginally suitable OB configuration is the 'ripole' (google for it)
Audio Elevation domain is for sale now, but they had a model with manger+ripole. I can imagine having the ripole resonance within the used frequency range could be a problem in time domain, even filtered correctly, so maybe they crossed low.
This 15"er is OB-suitable, would allow a 1st order x-over (rarely found in pro woofers), has enough power for boosting, and Panomaniac reports it sounds tight, what is important when you mate it with a Manger.
http://www.seleniumloudspeakers.com/site2004/catalogo/pdf/wooferpw3_15pw3_15pw3-slf_new.pdf
This 15"er is OB-suitable, would allow a 1st order x-over (rarely found in pro woofers), has enough power for boosting, and Panomaniac reports it sounds tight, what is important when you mate it with a Manger.
http://www.seleniumloudspeakers.com/site2004/catalogo/pdf/wooferpw3_15pw3_15pw3-slf_new.pdf
Oh thanks
that sounds good
do you know a link on diyAudio
where they talk about this beauty ??
The search is sometimes tricky and pumps out a 100 hits
Gush how simple such a setup could be, sure a bit huge
but simple at all
😀 😉
that sounds good
do you know a link on diyAudio
where they talk about this beauty ??
The search is sometimes tricky and pumps out a 100 hits
Gush how simple such a setup could be, sure a bit huge
but simple at all
😀 😉
Going There
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=111318&perpage=50&highlight=&pagenumber=1
it is somehow the same situation, not the same but
the mid's and high's are a horn out put at the back none
so the Manger can have his back chamber
and one ore two bass are open baffel
a digital x over a dream comes true
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=111318&perpage=50&highlight=&pagenumber=1
it is somehow the same situation, not the same but
the mid's and high's are a horn out put at the back none
so the Manger can have his back chamber
and one ore two bass are open baffel
a digital x over a dream comes true
Look at Axel´s Manger Dipole. He really is the man to talk to. You can send him an Email by clicking on his name in the upper left corner of his post.
Well as the Manger needs only 8 to 10 l for the back chamber a real dipole is a waste of $$$ combined like in the Usher thread with one selenium driver in an open baffel should do the trick nicely.
Hello,
what do you think about the
http://cees-manufaktur.de/lautsprecher_prospero.htm
Manger OB cut ~300 Hz with alu Bass
The point is Manger needs an extremly fast bass,
so large driver in combi with Manger not the best solution.
what do you think about the
http://cees-manufaktur.de/lautsprecher_prospero.htm
Manger OB cut ~300 Hz with alu Bass
The point is Manger needs an extremly fast bass,
so large driver in combi with Manger not the best solution.
13.000 Euro
are you crazy !!!!!!
ok some driver from Jordan
other can do the trick much more cheaper
Mangers, they use some cheapish 12 sorry
and others on their DIY page 15's in huge boxes
why
what the hell is a fast bass ??
I've been years on the basslist and all fast bass talk
is nothing as a myth
an deep organ pipe is a very fast bass to.
is backloading producing a fast bass?
So
are you crazy !!!!!!
ok some driver from Jordan
other can do the trick much more cheaper
Mangers, they use some cheapish 12 sorry
and others on their DIY page 15's in huge boxes
why
what the hell is a fast bass ??
I've been years on the basslist and all fast bass talk
is nothing as a myth
an deep organ pipe is a very fast bass to.
is backloading producing a fast bass?
So
The other OB philosophy propagated by magnetar is using a bunch of smaller drivers because they have a better driving force / moving mass ratio.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=114050
A European equivalent to the madisons would be this one:
http://www.ciare.com/pdf/catalogo/CW250.pdf
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=114050
A European equivalent to the madisons would be this one:
http://www.ciare.com/pdf/catalogo/CW250.pdf
- Status
- Not open for further replies.