• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

ECC88 mu-follower

This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Hey guys, I need to know the output impedance of the attached schematic.



  • PCM1704 mu-follower ECC88.png
    PCM1704 mu-follower ECC88.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 375

I haven't looked in detail at the formulas but if DF96 questions them, they might be fishy.
In any case I would consider a 300 or 400 output impedance way too high for a 300 Ohm load. That would mean you loose 6dB of signal. For such a load you'd be better off with 100 Ohm or less, ideally even 50. Which would require a huge coupling cap, bad idea IMHO.


P.S.: I think you should start to try more yourself instead of randomly picking schematics and wondering if they might work. Building such circuits on a breadboard does not take a lot of time, is a lot of fun and you will learn a lot. This will also enable you to ask better questions so you will get better advice
I would not load it with less then 10KOhm.
It can drive a lower impedance but then distortion goes up.
I have build an ECC88 mu follower where i got the output impedance down to 140 Ohm.
You then have to run more idle current.
I find a mu follower a really good circuit :
High gain, high bandwidth and low output impedance.
It was used in output stages of measurement instruments from Rohde&Schwarz and Wandel&Goltermann.
The problem with the SRPP (and hence mu-follower) formula on the linked page is that the author appears to simply put the upper and lower arms in parallel and assume that this is the output impedance. He doesn't take account of the lower valve driving the upper valve, which is the whole point of the circuit!

For the SRPP (and mu-follower) the output impedance and optimum load impedance can be (and usually should be) quite different. It is even possible (I think) to design an SRPP with an output impedance which exceeds its optimum load impedance - so you automatically get a significant reduction in gain when you load it optimally.

The SRPP can make a good amplifier when it is designed for a particular application. Sadly, what we mainly see is 'generic' SRPPs randomly scattered into (mainly Chinese) circuits as a fashion statement.

As I said, see the Valve Wizard for about the best explanation on the web.

Do you actually read and think about the answers you get? Then it should be clear that a SRPP will probably not cut it either for your application

What about an ECC88 SRPP?

Yes, what about it? Why don't you sling your soldering iron and bang a SRPP together and just see how it works? Costs next to nothing and is a quick job

This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.