Hey guys, so i'm building a classic NE5532 headphone amp, and i need help with potentiometer selection. i have cheap dual gang potentiometers laying around, but i was wondering if it is really worth it to spend money on an expensive one. What is the noise difference on expensive vs cheap ones?
cheap vs expensive potentiometer
- Thread starter joesphanlu
- Start date
Tracking is one big difference. Give your pot a try, you can always replace it with a better one.
Make sure that your pot is intended for use as a volume control, with an audio taper.
Alps makes good cheap ones. RadioShack sells 100k Alps volume controls for $4. https://www.radioshack.com/products...nged-stereo-volume-control?variant=5717293381
These are good: http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/172025202945?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_noapp=true
Switched precision resistor controls are very good.
http://glass-ware.stores.yahoo.net/atandsise.html
http://www.ebay.com/bhp/stepped-attenuator
Last edited:
thanks for the replies guys
How many K pot should i use? how many ks will get me the least noise, but at the same time have good audio clarity and detail? Also how much difference will the expensive ones make?
I will give the cheap ones i have a shot, as most of my source equipment have volume controls there, i might just stick on the ones i have, and keep it in one position. Is there any way that i can improve the reliability? (lubrication, cleaning etc.)
How many K pot should i use? how many ks will get me the least noise, but at the same time have good audio clarity and detail? Also how much difference will the expensive ones make?
I will give the cheap ones i have a shot, as most of my source equipment have volume controls there, i might just stick on the ones i have, and keep it in one position. Is there any way that i can improve the reliability? (lubrication, cleaning etc.)
Just don't fall in the trap that they should/will sound different, or "better" .
Better made ones, which of course will be somewhat more expensive than plain vanilla ones (we are talking a few bucks instead of less than a dollar) will be better constructed, track better, be closer to rated value, maybe sealed or having scratch resistant tracks for longer life, all of which is good, of course.
That does not affect sound.
Now going to real expensive "exotic" ones, may or may not be electrically/mechanically better , but that will still not change sound.
Better made ones, which of course will be somewhat more expensive than plain vanilla ones (we are talking a few bucks instead of less than a dollar) will be better constructed, track better, be closer to rated value, maybe sealed or having scratch resistant tracks for longer life, all of which is good, of course.
That does not affect sound.
Now going to real expensive "exotic" ones, may or may not be electrically/mechanically better , but that will still not change sound.
Yeah, but if gets too much lower, the source won't be able to drive it. Tradeoffs, tradeoffs.
OPA1611 buffer -> 2 kΩ pot -> OPA1611 buffer would be my suggestion.
Tom
what should be a good buffer capacitor size? i have some post 2013 3.3uf, 22uf, 100uf and 47uf lelons laying around. i apologize for my noobness, as i don't have much experience with building amplifiers. but i'm sure others will find this helpful.
The coupling cap forms a high-pass filter with the resistance of the pot. The -3 dB frequency of the filter can be calculated as:
f0 = 1/(2*pi*R*C)
R in ohm. C in farad. Frequency in Hz. Just like anything else in the metric system: Base units go in, base units come out.
I'd aim for a cutoff of 2 Hz or below to avoid excessive attenuation within the audio band.
Tom