Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)

Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Wow, FR curves on peerless betters the rosso.
Do share your comparison of the two with G2 waveguide.
You mean my subjective impression of the sound? I don't have such opinion yet, nor did I listen to ROSSO without EQ. I was just struck with the sound of such clean and dynamic acoustic source - you don't hear that every day.
 
Last edited:
In India, we get some of the Peerless drivers (including DFM 2535) here:
https://electrocarts.in/

Now they ship abroad too.. I got my Peerless CDs from this site. I have no affiliations with this site.
If anyone is interested, can contact the shop directly via above website.

120pcs avaiable 52$+100$ shipping plus taxes

silentpound bought 150pcs two months ago
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
And a quick ~0/10/20/30 deg set:

View attachment 1322350

Shouldn't require a lot of EQ :)

BTW, A460G2 has been released.

Alternative?
https://audioxpress.com/article/test-bench-celestion-cdx1-1742-1-exit-pro-sound-compression-driver


DFM-2535 T520-25-STD
6BQ / 600Hz
DFM-2535 T520-25-STD 6BQ.png


BMS 4554-16 A520G2/36-STD-1
8 BQ / 600Hz
Will work much harder at LF
BMS 4554-16 A520G2:36-STD-1 8BQ.png


DFM-2544 A520G2-25-STD-1
7 BQ / 500Hz
Compromise HF vs Sensitivity to be found
Maybe better than DFM2535?
DFM-2544 A520G2-25-STD-1-7BQ.png


T520-ROSSO-STD
8BQ / 500Hz
Not too bad, with a DSP...
T520-ROSSO-STD 8BQ.png


The DI of these at HF is touch high?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Maybe it's time for DE250 again. I also looked at RCF NDX495 / NDX595, Lavoce DF10.171M / DF10.171K, and of course some of the Faitals, that would need to be tested. But I don't expect any of these to be as smooth as the DFM-2535. Maybe also 18Sound ND1018BT.
I still need to try the HF108, as soon as I find it :)

1" RCF NDX595 / datasheet:
1718644603955.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Maybe it's time for DE250 again. I also looked at RCF NDX495 / NDX595, Lavoce DF10.171M / DF10.171K, and of course some of the Faitals, that would need to be tested. But I don't expect any of these to be as smooth as the DFM-2535. Maybe also 18Sound ND1018BT.
I still need to try the HF108, as soon as I find it :)

1" RCF NDX595 / datasheet:
View attachment 1323431
If you haven't checked out the new B&C DH350 and DH450 I suggest you do. Based on how these are measuring on our new wave shaping devices it appears they produce a flatter wavefront at the exit than most other compression drivers. And they sound excellent too.
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
If you haven't checked out the new B&C DH350 and DH450 I suggest you do. Based on how these are measuring on our new wave shaping devices it appears they produce a flatter wavefront at the exit than most other compression drivers. And they sound excellent too.
Sure, I'm looking forward to trying the DH450. DH350 didn't fully convince me yet but it will be interesting to try a wave shaper with two channels corresponding to their existing ones. Apparently, they did go to some lengths to make the two paths equal (not only path lengths but velocities as well). If that's true, my wave shaping plug should finally work as intended. That would be awesome.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Sure, I'm looking forward to trying the DH450. DH350 didn't fully convince me yet but it will be interesting to try a wave shaper with two channels corresponding to their existing ones. Apparently, they did go to some lengths to make the two paths equal (not only path lengths but velocities as well). If that's true, my wave shaping plug should finally work as intended. That would be awesome.
Agreed, they should work well with your wave shaping plug. Below is a dual driver (DH450) on a 10 degree vertical Paraline lens and conical style horn with 10% smoothing.
1718709566204.png