50% off to take Betsy where she's never been! - Page 7 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Manufacturers > Wild Burro Audio

Wild Burro Audio DIY full range speakers from Wild Burro Audio Labs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th May 2010, 07:23 PM   #61
pjanda1 is offline pjanda1  United States
diyAudio Member
 
pjanda1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Remember that you need that too much damping (too low a Qts) is too little bass. Too much is too boomy. 4 ohms might be more than you need. I haven't run the numbers, but a couple of ohms may get your peak down. Still, an underdamped peak would more likely be up around 100-150hz.

Paul
Wild Burro Audio Labs - DIY Full Range Speakers
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2010, 07:26 PM   #62
Tea-Bag is offline Tea-Bag  United States
not politcally affiliated
diyAudio Member
 
Tea-Bag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kennebunk
Blog Entries: 7
Keantoken,
That's a cool looking speaker. Two channels in one. Sweet idea! Probably perfect for a smaller listening area.
__________________
Salas Boards 2014 #2 SHIPPED |F5TC board and power supplies available PM | Hot-Rod DCB1 boards and kits available PM |Mesmerize kits available (no boards)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2010, 09:58 PM   #63
diyAudio Member
 
keantoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Blog Entries: 2
Hey thanks Tbag, I was surprised by just how darn good it looks. I was a perfectionist when building but now I realize there's not much I could do to make it look bad. I was worried about the speakers being so low. I wanted to put them higher but decided against it.

I was sort of worried about the stereo separation. I would have made the whole thing larger if my room wasn't so small. I haven't tried putting damping behind the speakers yet. I was thinking of stretching a couple layers of soft towels over the back of them. With my head near the back of the baffle next to the wall, I can detect a few small peaks when doing a frequency sweep.

Actually the bass still seems a little minimal, but perhaps it only seems that way since the bass no longer distorts so badly and I'm used to my old speakers.

- keantoken
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2010, 10:55 PM   #64
diyAudio Member
 
keantoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Blog Entries: 2
The response is actually amazingly flat compared to my old speakers. I've been doing some more controlled tests and I think what I detect for the treble and highs is resonance and reflections and phase stuff from my small room. I don't think there is much difference at all for pure response.

The bass begins to become audible at 52Hz. You are right, any peaking is somewhere around 120Hz, but it seems more like a phase difference between the sides of my head than anything (I sit at a right angle to the speakers on my computer...). The rectification frequency in any amp is at precisely this frequency, so the amp may have some affect too. (wait, I think my car amp uses a switching supply...)

- keantoken
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2010, 11:42 PM   #65
adason is offline adason  United States
diyAudio Member
 
adason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
this fr response is what I got on betsy-wow
Attached Images
File Type: jpg betsy wow on axis.jpg (85.4 KB, 215 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2010, 03:21 AM   #66
diyAudio Member
 
keantoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Blog Entries: 2
Is this strange?

As I increase the series resistor, the response around 174Hz dips, instead of peaking. This is a spread out dip, between C3 and C4 (130Hz to 261Hz). This has the effect of seeming to drain the life out of music if it's strong with a large series resistor, since it cuts out the lower midrange. From here it gets louder rather steadily with increasing frequency. Shouldn't the response peak instead of dip?

- keantoken
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2010, 09:41 PM   #67
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas
I'm not sure what to do now:

Was expecting low QTS suitable for Karlson loaded project...
Might have received open baffle Betsy (without the K)?
Its a nice speaker. Can still use for something, I suppose...
Just maybe not for same plan as I had originally posted.

Sais "Betsy" on both the box and the magnet...
And QTS measures 0.8 as-if optimized for an open baffle.

Kean said something about adding a series resistor before
his open baffle sounded right? Maybe he got my low QTS
K's? They were both ordered and paid on the same check.

Kean, what yours say on the magnet? Was there a sticker?

This was after about 10 min breakin at very low volume...
Just using WT3 tester itself to play some music in Mono.
Measurements made in fee air (very hot and humid), and
with 20g non-magnetic weight added (4 US Nickle coins).
Attached Images
File Type: png betsy.png (54.0 KB, 170 views)

Last edited by kenpeter; 6th June 2010 at 09:48 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2010, 01:08 AM   #68
freddi is offline freddi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
freddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
BetsyK should have the double thick magnet
http://www.wildburroaudio.com/_images/betsy_k.jpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2010, 01:16 AM   #69
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
The Betsy OB driver has ventilated poleplate, the Betsy-K hasnt
Its very easy to see which is which
__________________
sometimes we know very little, and sometimes we know too much
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2010, 05:43 AM   #70
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas
I got OB Betsy with thin magnet, bumped back plate, and vent hole.
Fairly sure of it now... Though I still wonder which type Kean got?
Can't fathom Kean's preference for series resistor if his OB Betsy has
the same curves as what I just measured? If BetsyK, would explain.
I suspect shipments (I ordered and paid for both) got wires crossed.

Not certain I can use 0.8Qts for my 3rdK12 project? Unless I don't
use fullrange, but cross down to 1955RE Karlson K15 (overstuffed
with SigmaPro18) at some frequency well above Betsy's Q peak.

Even then, I doubt 90db sensitivity is useful matched against 97db.
How much could I boost Betsy's effective sensitivity, tightly cupping
the back? I mean, if I was to intentionally cut off all the low end and
send Fs and Q skyrocketing, but cross to 18 well above that mess...

Compare Alpha-8 against Alpha-8MRA, I think the closed basket is the
only major difference? But the sensitivity went way up as the low end
of useful bandwidth got whacked... Would it be the same on Betsy?

Last edited by kenpeter; 7th June 2010 at 06:07 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OB: Dark Star Shootout - Betsy vs. B200 rjbond3rd Full Range 46 16th November 2012 12:47 PM
Betsy/Boomer OB speaker kit Godzilla Wild Burro Audio 9 27th January 2011 03:51 AM
Betsy-K Impedence Karl71 Wild Burro Audio 1 7th December 2009 12:09 AM
Betsy/Boomer OB Speaker Godzilla Full Range 7 19th November 2009 02:42 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:00 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2