|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Vendor's Bazaar Commercial Vendors large & small hawking their wares |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#81 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
So when the Monitor is ready we need a sub ?
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Here is my design for an easy to make cabinet that looks good and does the Job as well.
The baffle is staggered and allows delay compensation between the tweeter and the woofer. Diffraction is scattered so the cabinet has less influence on imaging clues. The second version has chamfered edges and should work even better. The edges can also be rounded. |
|
|
|
#83 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Design number 1 can also be modified by putting felt around the staggered elements making the tweeter baffle flat in essence.
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
Haven’t you considered using a ”ladder delay network” to electrically address the driver units relative acoustic center off-set instead of using a stepped or slanted baffle? This would make the loudspeaker enclosure even easier to build, but at the expense of a bit more complicated cross-over design. Sonically it work very well and it’s very easy to fine tune once you have the basic ladder circuit in place. I’ve found it to work very well when using shallow filters like a true LR2, but it’s over-kill/not necessary to use it with steeper filters. Here's an example: Sequence Two – Monitor Sequence Two – Monitor BE Regards /Göran
__________________
Author of the "AudioExcite Loudspeaker Design" website http://www.audioexcite.com |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
|
the sketches looks similarly to one of the Sonus Faber's bookshelf.
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I prefer thick sides over a thick front
a thick baffle is like mounting the driver in a tube, which wouldnt be so good |
|
|
|
#87 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Isn't actually that deep, for an average person, body resonance is around 70-120Hz.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
#88 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
What you call a "ladder delay network" has not only the effect of delaying the tweeter but it also adds an all pass term so you can not build a time coherent speaker with a ladder network. When i go the the Sequence Two measurements the drivers match in phase only over a quite narrow range. With acoustic delay by mechanical means i can do better WHEN i want to make an all pass crossover.
Henry, please show me the Sonus faber model that looks similar. Tinitus, a thin baffle is not a very stable playground for the drivers. |
|
|
|
#89 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, that looks very similar. Is that an old Guarneri ? And yes, why not doing it the same way ? I think it looks good and is effective.
Here are some other ideas. Two of them are modular. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SB Acoustics 3 ways | cosmindaniel12 | Multi-Way | 18 | 1st June 2012 05:52 PM |
| More T/S specs needed for SB Acoustics | mcmahon48 | Multi-Way | 2 | 15th August 2010 12:34 PM |
| All SB Acoustics MTM ?? | Andy G | Multi-Way | 12 | 26th September 2009 12:35 PM |
| Anybody familiar with SB Acoustics | zimjj | Multi-Way | 0 | 13th March 2009 10:30 PM |
| SB Acoustics... The stuff looks good | sardonx | Multi-Way | 20 | 16th February 2008 08:15 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |