|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Vendor's Bazaar Commercial Vendors large & small hawking their wares |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#4491 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Crete
|
Quote:
Check the datasheet.
__________________
"You have a hierarchy: a mathematician, a physicist (which is a failed mathematician), and an engineer (which is a failed physicist)." - Andrew Jones |
|
|
|
|
#4492 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
|
|
|
|
#4493 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Before we get to my actual listening experience I would like to say a few words about this thread and why I hesitated to post this. I have been reading it completely, most of it some weeks ago before I ordered my amps.
My impression is that there is one lead message here – the Ncores are among the best amps in the world. Mainly because of a lot of genuine, credible very positive user feedback which really speaks for the product. One of the reasons I bought them. But then there are a few “residents” in this thread that apparently made the Ncores a kind of religion that has to be defended against all criticism. Some don’t even own the amp, they just believe they have to be great because they like the no-nonsense technocratic philosophy which is in line with their personal believes. I admit that the little criticism which has been expressed so far was expressed sometimes a bit un-objective. It is clear that we all just share our opinions, and opinions can differ. However, I think it should be legitimate for everybody to say if they’re not completely overwhelmed without being considered a troll or somebody who holds a grudge against the product, the producer or the concept. It is even necessary to give potential readers of this thread a complete picture. Which leads me to my listening experience. I have tested the amps & smps only in a temporary setup without case and with suboptimal shielding, cabling etc.. I basically put them on a board and wired everything correct but far from optimal. So far I have been listening for may be six hours. The amps show very good control, tight and dry bass and rather neutral behavior across the whole frequency range. They reproduce a good level of detail. However, I do have a lot of noise going on in the background. Sorry my English is not good enough to describe this properly, but it is not only white noise but also other acoustic artefacts that I don’t know where they come from. Also, the whole upper frequency range sounds kind of “distant” – away from the listener, not open, much more closed. Details are present, but everything is very “twitchy”. For comparison - I owned different amps in the past and today I own a conventional Class AB amp and two Pass F4 (which has been used as a prime example for a silly audiophool class A amp in this thread a couple of times). The F4 has far less control in the lower frequency range. The bass is spongy, I use rather conventional 3-way speakers that have only around 89dB which is not an ideal combination. However, basically all the rest (except the bass) sounds a lot better to me than what the Ncores do so far. That includes tonality, stage, completely dead silent background, etc.. To be clear - I don’t follow any philosophy. The F4 has been an experiment like the Ncores are. I would have loved to throw it out of the window, spongy bass and all, and keep the slick, small and efficient Ncores. But in the current setup they are a different league. No chance the Ncores are going to replace the F4 yet, even with the spongy bass. Let’s see whether things change once the Ncores are in their cases, better grounded and shielded, I assume the background noise will go down. To not offend people with philosophies any further I am not going to mention they might change while they burn in. However, I will spend more time with them and report on any changes. ![]() Best Regards Sven
__________________
Gruenschnabel Last edited by Abraxas336; 20th June 2012 at 04:01 PM. |
|
|
|
#4494 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
Quote:
I'd love to see you do a comparison with a linear supply in stead of the SMPS. With linear supply I mean a really good one, which IMO is a low DCR power supply transformer and not a huge bank of capacitance (2 x 20 mF high quality low ESR caps should do). Maybe your "twitchy" sound has to do with SMPS HF issues, and this comparison might get some more insight in the behaviour of different power supplies. I can't get rid off the feeling that a "form factor" SMPS is not the best solution for an audiophile amplifier. |
|
|
|
|
#4495 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
|
Sam and Shaman, the data sheet is unclear to me. Under "4 Absolute maximum ratings," "input current" ("logical inputs and buffer inputs") is listed as 10mA max.
Moving down the page to "5 Recommended Operating Conditions and Supply Currents," I see "Signal stage supply voltage (positive and negative)," whose voltage range is listed as 16-25V, with an average current specified on the next line as 40mA. The next line is "External driver supply voltage," which seems to refer to a +only supply voltage, the current draw for which is ave. 70mA. The 10mA max rating, from 4, for "logical inputs and buffer inputs" (= "Signal stage supply current"?) looks to refer to the +/– 15V supply input, and seems to be in error. It perhaps should read 100mA. |
|
|
|
#4496 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: paris
|
Quote:
or conversely , there is a hole in the high or midrange , so the bass seem spongy |
|
|
|
|
#4497 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
Btw, bridging two Ncores should augment this benefit. |
|
|
|
|
#4498 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#4499 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
Quote:
I would love to see details about your setup, cabling etc. - the effects you describe could possibly be caused by bad shielding/grounding. |
|
|
|
|
#4500 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hypex problem, who can help | Hansms | Class D | 8 | 10th March 2011 08:18 PM |
| Hypex | steveww | Class D | 14 | 18th November 2010 01:44 PM |
| Question for those who have tried hypex smps with hypex modules | avian | Class D | 12 | 3rd March 2009 09:30 AM |
| Hypex UcD 180AD + signal wires, Power Supply ST, Hypex Transformer TR100A | c10h12n2 | Swap Meet | 7 | 7th July 2007 03:55 PM |
| FS: Hypex UcD 400/180AD, hypex toroid | Archmage | Swap Meet | 4 | 14th November 2006 04:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |