hypex ncore - Page 42 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Vendor Forums > Vendor's Bazaar

Vendor's Bazaar Commercial Vendors large & small hawking their wares

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th September 2011, 08:26 AM   #411
Nevod is offline Nevod  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via ICQ to Nevod
Ouroboros,

I believe the "adapter", which schematics I'm attaching here does something like that.
I don't remember exactly though how it works, have to dig though 50+ pages of forum for that. IIRC, it mixes 200 kHz square wave with input signal, provided from a normal power amp, and then runs it through a small step up transformer. THD is 1% at 200Hz, not suitable for higher frequencies.

Could you please explain what would be that modulation method?
Attached Images
File Type: gif Shema.GIF (15.8 KB, 753 views)
File Type: png ESL test 6.9.png (59.5 KB, 749 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2011, 08:33 AM   #412
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
What Ouroboros is talking about is to have a 50% duty cycle source and a 4-quadrant synchronous rectifier equally running at 50% where the phase between the two square waves is varied. On average, somewhere on the planet someone is trying this method about once a year in an attempt to build a "one stage class D amp and SMPS" only to realise the thing still contains the same number of active devices and the same amount of ferrite. But it would rid you of the step-up.

Now something that I have been wondering about is why so many people want a class D amp to drive headphones with. You can build a HV amp for electrostatic headphones using devices no bigger than a TO92. No magnetics needed. If you use circuit boards for the stators you can integrate the amp.
__________________
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2011, 09:05 AM   #413
diyAudio Member
 
Ouroboros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
Thanks Bruno, that's pretty much it.
The scheme I looked at basically takes the output of a normal PWM modulator and follows this with two async divide by two stages, one dividing on the rising edge of the PWM, and the other on the falling edge. The output from one of the dividers feeds the full-bridge output stage, while the output of the other divider controls the sync rectifiers. Both signals stay close to a 50% duty cycle, but have a varying phase shift between them.
Works well for a clocked open-loop system at 50Hz, but I'd like to see evidence that it could be made to work over the audio band. For 100V output class-D PA amplifiers it would be a useful technique.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2011, 09:51 AM   #414
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
I think the first useful class D amps with this techniques were designed by Brian Attwood and sold by Peavey. It's quite long ago. Specs weren't brilliant but it worked.
__________________
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2011, 12:26 PM   #415
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
Yes they were the DPC series (Digital Power Conversion). They were one of the first really powerful amps on the market using one rack space only.
At least in Switzerland they were not officially available. I am not sure wheter this was because of an EMC issue or maybe the lack of power factor correction.

Regards

Charles
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2011, 01:06 PM   #416
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Bruno, I would sure like to applaud your participation here in the DIY community. That seems to be a rare quality among professional audio designers.

The progress (e.g. input buffer) on the NC400 sounds fantastic. Are we rapidly approaching the "ultimate" amplifier in NCore? It sure seems to me that we are, at least in audible/measurable ways (i.e. what matters).

I'm planning for NCore to be my personal "ultimate" amplifier in any case
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2011, 03:13 PM   #417
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: At the output stage
Send a message via Yahoo to mr_push_pull
Bruno, I have to step in and tell you how anxious I am about this product. I started to think that you've dedicated yourself completely to Grimm Audio and left Hypex for good. Happy to find the contrary.

I've been using a UCD180-based amp for about 5 years now and recently started to consider purchasing a Hypex SMPS as I got myself some rather hard to drive loudspeakers which make the current PS sound like it's reaching its limits sometimes. But I'm only happy to have looked here because I found about the NC and decided to wait until it's released. BTW one more vote for the 400W version (if the vote is still open).

I was curious about the form-factor and heat sink requirements. I might even order in advance a nice case for it
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2011, 10:20 AM   #418
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
@FloridaBear: One can always imagine designing fancier output stages using the latest newest hyperwonderful power devices etc but for practical purposes the NC400 is going to be "the best I can do" for a while.

@MrPP The module is mounted flat and cooled through the base like the OEM series UcD modules. If you just bolt them onto the bottom of a metal case you've got enough cooling. Mounting them in an angled position requires an L bracket which we'll probably supply as well. The module takes up roughly the same size as the UcD400OEM but it's not exactly the same shape. I'm now revising the layout so more details remain up in the air.
__________________
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.

Last edited by Bruno Putzeys; 28th September 2011 at 10:23 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2011, 11:40 AM   #419
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: hong Kong
Send a message via ICQ to ackcheng
Hi Bruno,

Can you NC400 be Bridged to get more power? 3 of them will make NC1200!
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2011, 01:56 PM   #420
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
Yes you can bridge two modules just like UcD (and just like UcD it helps to strap a small cap across the load to insure the two amps synchronize). This would make a 1200W/4ohm amp (NC1200 is 1200W/2ohm).

But three of them?
__________________
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hypex problem, who can help Hansms Class D 9 18th August 2013 06:49 AM
Hypex steveww Class D 14 18th November 2010 01:44 PM
Question for those who have tried hypex smps with hypex modules avian Class D 12 3rd March 2009 09:30 AM
Hypex UcD 180AD + signal wires, Power Supply ST, Hypex Transformer TR100A c10h12n2 Swap Meet 7 7th July 2007 03:55 PM
FS: Hypex UcD 400/180AD, hypex toroid Archmage Swap Meet 4 14th November 2006 04:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2