Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Vendor Forums > Vendor's Bazaar
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Vendor's Bazaar Commercial Vendors large & small hawking their wares

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th February 2012, 02:07 PM   #1941
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
Quote:
Originally Posted by noah katz View Post
Care to comment on this, Bruno? Seems a bit doctrinaire, which doesn't sound like you.
It doesn't sound like someone who uses IC op amps as much as I do. The reason for the discrete buffer has to do with something I posted earlier on page 26.
Based on what I know about IC processing, getting round the non-linear capacitance from the inputs to the rails would require an SOI process. For an op amp manufacturer this is not enough reason to do so. This is pretty much the only serious drawback I can name for IC op amps. This issue causes exactly no problem at all when you balance the impedances at both op amp inputs. Unfortunately there's just no way you can do this in a follower stage because the impedance at the inverting input is fixed (the feedback network) and at the noninverting input it's whatever the source throws at it.
The closest you can get to having no problem is by keeping both impedances low. Now, if there's one thing you can't count on when selling amplifiers into the consumer audiophile market it's the output impedance of the preamplifier. Just think about passive controllers.
Under those circumstances having a discrete input stage definitely helps. The NC400 is intended as a no holds barred design so discrete is what it became. Now, adding cascoded emitter followers in front of an ordinary IC op amp equally does the trick but once you've done that you've already built half an op amp. That and the fact that you don't add the input noise of the IC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor White View Post
This sounds a bit pretentious and dismissive of others work in the field
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisPa View Post
I've never known a journalist to report what actually happened/was said - take it as interpretation by the authors
That was a bit of creative quoting of my own just now :P

The snippet you're referring to is a heavily condensed version of my answer to the question who I thought was equally working to push the bounds of audio performance and theoretical insight in class D. In that case indeed Lars, Sören and the rest of the TI crew come to mind. I think what they're doing in silicon terms is pretty trailblazing. The guys who did the original Mueta design are also still actively researching modulation theory but not doing any practical audio work (on account of being too busy making rather amazing sensorless motor drives).

M&H's interpretation sounds a bit crass but I can't help noticing a certain paucity in the number of published class D measurements approaching those of Ncore. That could either mean nobody's doing it or there's suddenly going to be an Ncore killer from a hitherto unknown designer. The former makes people uneasy because it's simply not on to say (or even think) you're ahead of the game, the latter makes me uneasy because I have no idea what or who I'm racing against. But the least you can say is that I'm not doing too badly. Of course there is the occasional outburst from those who advance philosophical arguments to excuse less than stellar results ("it's more digital!" "measured results matter only until they're as good as mine", "the stuff you hear is something different altogether" etc) but I don't think it would be pretentious to suggest that they're in an entirely different game.
__________________
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.

Last edited by Bruno Putzeys; 8th February 2012 at 02:25 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 03:59 PM   #1942
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Bruno,

I have a pair of nCore 400's arriving tomorrow. Looking forward to auditioning them.

Question. And please just direct me if this has already been addressed elsewhere in this or another thread.

For those with digital sources the nCore requires an upstream DAC and PRE (unless a digital attenuator is used). Do you believe it is feasible to design a commercially viable integrated device which could substantially improve sound quality of a DAC/PRE/nCore signal chain? This device would input a PCM signal via USB or SPDIF which would then be converted to Pulse Width Modulation, reclocked via a high quality clock, amplified in the digital domain, reclocked again, and then demodulated at the output of the amplifier to drive a speaker directly using some form of volume control (e.g. a voltage controlled attenuator that resides outside the signal path)?

Supposedly, Core Audio Technology in California is offering a product like this under the name Kratos. Currently it only outputs 20wpc so it is rather limited to high efficiency speakers.

Thanks for your perspective on this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 04:39 PM   #1943
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
It's been discussed earlier in the thread (I'm sure someone will post a link). In short, you're at the mercy of the switching speed of the FETs, the quality of the power supply and the load-dependent frequency response of the output filter when you do such a thing. Not a good idea.
__________________
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 07:11 PM   #1944
diyAudio Member
 
Speedskater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Did any manufactures display models at the recent CES show?
__________________
Kevin
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 07:38 PM   #1945
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
Yes.
__________________
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 07:40 PM   #1946
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: At the output stage
Send a message via Yahoo to mr_push_pull
Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaBear View Post
so they could do ABX testing...
ABX what???
__________________
"This site gives off very confusing signals, one minute highly technical discussions that leave the truly interested learners wallowing in their own stupidity and the next finds it endlessly repeating old wives tales and cockeyed theories as fact."
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 07:50 PM   #1947
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno Putzeys View Post
Yes.
Theta Prometheus....................................6000 dollars for one mono amplifier featuring ncore....and linear power supplies....
Gallery: Audio Electronics at CES 2012 | Sound and Vision Magazine

Last edited by pieter t; 8th February 2012 at 07:54 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 07:55 PM   #1948
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
Quote:
Originally Posted by pieter t View Post
Theta Prometheus....................................6000 dollars for one mono amplifier featuring ncore....and linear power supplies....
Gallery: Audio Electronics at CES 2012 | Sound and Vision Magazine
Yep...that's correct...

Cheers,

Jan-Peter
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 08:00 PM   #1949
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
For that price it had to be big'n heavy, so no SMPS.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2012, 12:15 AM   #1950
ro9397 is offline ro9397  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: No. Utah
Quote:
Originally Posted by earflappin View Post
"The end of January passed, are there any modules shipped?"

Mine shipped on Monday and I expect them to arrive tomorrow or Thursday latest. I got a shipment confirmation and tracking number from Hypex.

Unlike the rest of the DIY williewankers who have received the nCores but not posted reviews, I will definitely be posting my observations on their sound quality.
Thank you for that promise. Very much looking forward to reading your feedback. ETA? If not this thread, where?

Your comment reminds of the one of Zaph Audio's better DIY monitor designs...searched forever and could hardly find a couple sentences of feedback.
__________________
Jimbo
"Television is the poor man's whiskey." Russel Baker
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (3 members and 1 guests)
leedle, tony399, jeno
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hypex problem, who can help Hansms Class D 8 10th March 2011 08:18 PM
Hypex steveww Class D 14 18th November 2010 01:44 PM
Question for those who have tried hypex smps with hypex modules avian Class D 12 3rd March 2009 09:30 AM
Hypex UcD 180AD + signal wires, Power Supply ST, Hypex Transformer TR100A c10h12n2 Swap Meet 7 7th July 2007 03:55 PM
FS: Hypex UcD 400/180AD, hypex toroid Archmage Swap Meet 4 14th November 2006 04:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 PM.

Page generated in 0.15554 seconds (47.89% PHP - 52.11% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio