Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Vendor Forums > Vendor's Bazaar
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Vendor's Bazaar Commercial Vendors large & small hawking their wares

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th November 2009, 04:08 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Default Finished a 2XTDA1541A real balance DAC just for fun

These days I finished the TDA1541A DAC just for fun.
This DAC apply one TDA1541A for each channels for real balance output.
I apply the passive I/V change, I think passive IV change sound relax than active IV change.
The output is two diamond amps, the LPF only apply -6DB/oct.
There is a programmable Cyclone 2 as the digital filter, it design can work on NOS or OS mode.
In OS mode, it can setting work on 2X , 4X, or 8X oversampling , and the stopband attenuation can setting at -50DB, -90DB or -130DB.
Because apply the Cyclone 2 chip , I can let the TDA1541A work in one channel for balance, unlike apply the SA7220.
Attached Images
File Type: gif 20093814164371065.gif (80.8 KB, 297 views)
File Type: jpg 200911814314818946.jpg (89.1 KB, 288 views)
File Type: jpg 200911814314825316.jpg (63.4 KB, 267 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2009, 04:09 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Some other photos
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 200911814314855277.jpg (95.1 KB, 258 views)
File Type: jpg 200911814314895880.jpg (84.3 KB, 250 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2009, 04:14 PM   #3
ratza is offline ratza  Romania
diyAudio Member
 
ratza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sibiu, Romania
Man, that looks absolutely IMPRESSIVE.
__________________
Any solution is a compromise.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2009, 04:17 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
The DAC working without any couple caps and DC serve, the building is quite difficult, I want to measure and match the transistors two times to keep the output offset near 0V.
The power supply is large, it apply 5 units transformers, and 30 groups transistors PSU .
Here is some photos while building.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (84.8 KB, 174 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (139.4 KB, 166 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (69.2 KB, 161 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2009, 05:25 PM   #5
frenzic is offline frenzic  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: http://www.last.fm/user/frenzicatlast
I'm with ratza.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2009, 05:49 PM   #6
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
Sometimes a square peg fits a round hole just fine
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
OMG!! thats some serious...errmmm 'discrete' power supply action; in fact they need to come up with another word instead; seems far from discrete.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2009, 02:48 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by qusp View Post
OMG!! thats some serious...errmmm 'discrete' power supply action; in fact they need to come up with another word instead; seems far from discrete.
I conside the PSU very near the signal circuits is better than separate, can avoid the cable effect the SQ and sound color. But this just different viewpoint by different designer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2009, 02:07 PM   #8
flyboi is offline flyboi  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .
Send a message via ICQ to flyboi
Wow! Looks good! So, how is the sound?
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2009, 05:56 PM   #9
guido is offline guido  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
guido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: diepe zuiden
I agree it looks impressive. Some thoughts though:
- are the signals reclocked after the cyclone? I'm wondering about jitter.
- the cyclone seems overkill. With a pmd100 you can easily get the same setup (ok, without nos and filter settings). And not easy to get anymore, but still.
- looking at the block diagram, the output current has to travel a long way from left to right dac output. mmm..

Just my 2 cents without having details. A schematic would help :-) Had a look on the website, they actually do have designs with pmd100. Curious.
__________________
GuidoB
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2009, 11:00 PM   #10
piero7 is offline piero7  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
piero7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Matera
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help me balance SQ and SPL and weight for my sub eRiCdWoNg Subwoofers 6 25th February 2007 02:39 AM
Quad balance ginsner Solid State 4 16th August 2006 09:04 PM
Why is Q balance required goldyrathore Multi-Way 6 17th May 2004 12:04 AM
Combing effects: How real in "real" rooms? smeade1079 Multi-Way 3 10th March 2003 01:32 AM
Balance control 2Bak Pass Labs 4 11th July 2002 08:07 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Page generated in 0.11221 seconds (78.28% PHP - 21.72% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio