• These commercial threads are for private transactions. diyAudio.com provides these forums for the convenience of our members, but makes no warranty nor assumes any responsibility. We do not vet any members, use of this facility is at your own risk. Customers can post any issues in those threads as long as it is done in a civil manner. All diyAudio rules about conduct apply and will be enforced.

VSSA Lateral MosFet Amplifier

Considering the following curve (attached) and splitting the feedback 47 ohm resistance in two, one for the electrolytic to ground, one for the film cap to ground, i'm sure you can have several advantages: better linearity (no added resonances) and smaller film cap (with less inductance at HF, less surface, less price).
I know you can feel i'm a little maniac about it, but, based on my experience, it makes a noticeable difference in listening experience, as it was said in the SSA thread by some Diyers, witch preferred the electrolytic cap alone.
 

Attachments

  • vishay.jpg
    vishay.jpg
    117.9 KB · Views: 1,958
Last edited:
Considering the following curve (attached) and splitting the feedback 47 ohm resistance in two, one for the electrolytic to ground, one for the film cap to ground, i'm sure you can have several advantages: better linearity (no added resonances) and smaller film cap (with less inductance at HF, less surface, less price).
I know you can feel i'm a little maniac about it, but, based on my experience, it makes a noticeable difference in listening experience, as it was said in the SSA thread by some Diyers, witch preferred the electrolytic cap alone.

It is not practical to split.

What you want is to have a low impedance over the frequency band up to MHz region. Thats why we parallel them. But to avoid the resonance or at least damp it. We could add a 1R resistor in series with the elcap.

If you extend the curve to 10MHz you see that the impedance starts to rise again.
 
It is not practical to split.
What you want is to have a low impedance over the frequency band up to MHz region. Thats why we parallel them. But to avoid the resonance or at least damp it. We could add a 1R resistor in series with the elcap. If you extend the curve to 10MHz you see that the impedance starts to rise again.
Of course and that is all about. I know it is not easy, and need some real world experiment, but it is less critical than in the direct signal path, because any increase of the impedance increase the feedback, so reduce the gain at Hf, where we have no so much need ;-)
My idea, here, is to find the resonance of the electro cap then add a // RC with a little film cap ( 0.1µF or so ? ), just to linearize here and upper.
But the other way is just to forget the film cap, electrolytic are not so "evil".
 
Of course and that is all about. I know it is not easy, and need some real world experiment, but it is less critical than in the direct signal path, because any increase of the impedance increase the feedback, so reduce the gain at Hf, where we have no so much need ;-)
My idea, here, is to find the resonance of the electro cap then add a // RC with a little film cap ( 0.1µF or so ? ), just to linearize here and upper.
But the other way is just to forget the film cap, electrolytic are not so "evil".

yes you right. It is just as good to do it on a filmcap.

But the sound without elcaps in the signal path is better! :D
 
All VSSA parts got their positions on the PCB in the first phase, their optimal values will be fully investigated in the second phase of the testing. Feedback resistors values will likely be elevated to 2,2k/100R or something in between, depends on lower roll-off target. Power dissipation of certain resistor can be increased simply by paralleling/stacking them on top of each other. Specific Vishay SMD resistor case can handle 1W by default and can be increased to 5W as explained, if needed at all. :)
 
L.C., I have no idea of the real impact of this so called resistance distortion on listening and measurements, as i never made any exploration of this problem. May-be just an other 'audiophile' evil ?
Anyway, with such high bandwidth amps, and in this critical path, paralleling the resistances (lower reactance) can only have positive effects :)
 
Last edited:
All VSSA parts got their positions on the PCB in the first phase, their optimal values will be fully investigated in the second phase of the testing. Feedback resistors values will likely be elevated to 2,2k/100R or something in between, depends on lower roll-off target. Power dissipation of certain resistor can be increased simply by paralleling/stacking them on top of each other. Specific Vishay SMD resistor case can handle 1W by default and can be increased to 5W as explained, if needed at all. :)

Most SMD types need space of copper connected to the pins (in the same way as power mosfets and transistors) to get rid of the heat. So stacking will only increase the heat handle a little.
 
How cool is this guys? :cool:

One VSSA channel done, one more to go. :smash:
 

Attachments

  • VSSA PCB 4.jpg
    VSSA PCB 4.jpg
    620.1 KB · Views: 2,552
  • VSSA PCB 5.jpg
    VSSA PCB 5.jpg
    480.2 KB · Views: 2,342
  • VSSA PCB 8.jpg
    VSSA PCB 8.jpg
    418.6 KB · Views: 1,372
  • VSSA PCB 7.jpg
    VSSA PCB 7.jpg
    919.3 KB · Views: 1,654
  • VSSA PCB 9.jpg
    VSSA PCB 9.jpg
    392.3 KB · Views: 920
  • VSSA PCB 10.jpg
    VSSA PCB 10.jpg
    360.5 KB · Views: 766
  • VSSA PCB 11.jpg
    VSSA PCB 11.jpg
    458 KB · Views: 909
  • VSSA PCB 12.jpg
    VSSA PCB 12.jpg
    968.9 KB · Views: 1,064