• These commercial threads are for private transactions. diyAudio.com provides these forums for the convenience of our members, but makes no warranty nor assumes any responsibility. We do not vet any members, use of this facility is at your own risk. Customers can post any issues in those threads as long as it is done in a civil manner. All diyAudio rules about conduct apply and will be enforced.

SB Acoustics Satori Monitor

Thanks, yes, the BEO did really well.
I am sorry that i do not have any information when the Satori kit will be released.
David that originally comisioned this design has left SB.
When you need drivers you can contact me via PM.
I also have the circuit diagrams of the kit and the DIY version of the cabinet.
The DIY version was with a wide baffle and the tweeter set back.
 
Hello! I have made it!
Thanks, Joachim!
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0546.JPG
    DSCF0546.JPG
    329.8 KB · Views: 2,455
  • DSCF0547.JPG
    DSCF0547.JPG
    307.1 KB · Views: 2,361
  • DSCF0548.JPG
    DSCF0548.JPG
    273.3 KB · Views: 2,320
  • DSCF0550.JPG
    DSCF0550.JPG
    287.2 KB · Views: 2,181
  • DSCF0551.JPG
    DSCF0551.JPG
    304.8 KB · Views: 2,128
  • DSCF0553.JPG
    DSCF0553.JPG
    294.2 KB · Views: 638
  • DSCF0554.JPG
    DSCF0554.JPG
    287.2 KB · Views: 702
Last edited:
Is there any way to make a "Sticky" with the cabinet plans and crossover variations and include Jeff's Link to the his kit and Goran's as well! After all this is ONE LONG THREAD!

I am also curious what the difference between the 6020 and the 6600 for example! Also, I was able to sample the 6620 which is very impressive, what about the R3004/6020 as possible variations to Goran's Kit?
 
I am also curious what the difference between the 6020 and the 6600 for example! Also, I was able to sample the 6620 which is very impressive, what about the R3004/6020 as possible variations to Goran's Kit?

Hi,

I've done a not yet published version of the "Satori Two - Monitor" with the Beryllium (6640) tweeter. All of the above mentioned tweeters including the 6640 requires a different cross-over for the tweeter filter section compared to the original design with the stepped baffle and the D3004/602010 tweeter.

The version I've done with the 6640 tweeter uses a 6deg sloped baffle instead of the stepped one.

I don't like the "R" versions of the above tweeters even though they look cool. They have a more linear and extended on-axis frequency response at the cost of a worse off-axis response and a higher distortion profile than the "D" version.

Regards

/Göran
______
 
Hi,

I've done a not yet published version of the "Satori Two - Monitor" with the Beryllium (6640) tweeter. All of the above mentioned tweeters including the 6640 requires a different cross-over for the tweeter filter section compared to the original design with the stepped baffle and the D3004/602010 tweeter.

The version I've done with the 6640 tweeter uses a 6deg sloped baffle instead of the stepped one.

I don't like the "R" versions of the above tweeters even though they look cool. They have a more linear and extended on-axis frequency response at the cost of a worse off-axis response and a higher distortion profile than the "D" version.

Regards

/Göran
______


Thanks for the input on the R versions...so I guess they only question I have left is, since the 6600 is a lot more money than the 6020...what's the difference...besides the price difference!?? (Your last name wouldn't be Gillinger would it? I know another Swede named Goran, I'm of Swedish decent myself.)
 
Thanks for the input on the R versions...so I guess they only question I have left is, since the 6600 is a lot more money than the 6020...what's the difference...besides the price difference!?? (Your last name wouldn't be Gillinger would it? I know another Swede named Goran, I'm of Swedish decent myself.)

Hi,

Sorry, I'm not Gillinger.

Main differences of the D3004/602010 compared to D3004/660000:

  • Smaller and differently shaped face plate, 62mm vs. 104mm
  • No AirCirc motor layout
  • About 2dB less sensitivity
  • Lower Fs, 425Hz vs. 470Hz
  • Slightly higher distortion profile
  • Decreasing frequency response from 15kHz vs. increasing frequency response from 15kHz (see pictures)
They both share the same dome, surround and voice-coil assembly.

Attached pictures:

D3004/660000 = Blue
D3004/602010 = Red

Note! The graphs are normalized to about the same SPL.


For measurement details see:
www.audioexcite.com ScanSpeak D3004/602010
www.audioexcite.com ScanSpeak D3004/660000

For the price the D3004/602010 is a great tweeter. For a small face plate tweeter it's a great choice and is almost if not equally good sonically as the D3004/660000.


Regards

/Göran
 

Attachments

  • Freq - 0deg 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    Freq - 0deg 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    137.8 KB · Views: 1,984
  • Freq - 15deg 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    Freq - 15deg 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    138.4 KB · Views: 1,951
  • Freq - 22.5deg 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    Freq - 22.5deg 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 1,929
  • Freq - 30deg 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    Freq - 30deg 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    139.5 KB · Views: 1,915
  • Imp - 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    Imp - 602010 vs 660000.jpg
    312.8 KB · Views: 1,897