Building an open embedded audio applicance.

[MASantos]

More I/O for what purposes?

[Russ White]

I just ordered a new BBB this week. (I have one of the older ones too)

This place keeps a regular stock (they are out at the moment, but will have more in a week):

https://www.logicsupply.com/componen...FShk7Aod1mIABA

I also found several places that had them in stock just by googling, including Amazon. But your likely to pay more that way.

Digikey says they will have more stock in a about a week.

[Russ White]

Originally Posted by MASantos

More I/O for what purposes?

Not more. Better, less error/latency prone.

[palmito]

Work is currently being done on i2s connections for the Udoo boards too (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-ba...ml#post3757629).

[vdi_nenna]

Don't you guys think it's better to have a board with single process, instead of multi-processor board?

[asdiasx]

Hi everybody! I decided to begin a project like this but I'm having problem to find the BBB here in my country.... I found the "Cubieboard 2", and the seller tells that it is compatible with RP and has a better performance.

Does anybody know if I can use this board for Buffalo III integration via I2S and Volumio?

Regards

[Russ White]

Originally Posted by palmito

Work is currently being done on i2s connections for the Udoo boards too (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-ba...ml#post3757629).

I have looked at udoo, but frankly we don't need half it capabilities, nor its much higher cost.

My goal is to build an audio appliance, not a full scale system.

[amix]

Aah! The CubieBoard. That could be interesting, indeed. Or not? ;-) Though it's more expensive.

Bye, Andreas

[ACX]

Originally Posted by Russ White

My goal is to build an audio appliance, not a full scale system.

BBB is great for that purpose and probably is the one with the best quality/price ratio.

[Russ White]

Yes, I have looked at the cubieboard too, but I can't see anything to convince me to choose it over the BBB.