|
|
#31 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Prague
|
When we assume that Buffalo III crystal is good enough already, so why not use it as reference clock?
For such use we need to be able generate clock for 44.1/58/96/... kHz stream and export it as SPDIF clock/Masterclock/Wordclock, so it could be used to as clock reference in the source device, e.g. in the sound card. Could it work? Last edited by miero; 5th October 2012 at 05:19 PM. |
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
I do not know any other than using a PLL which don't cont because will add a lot of jitter |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Prague
|
OK, I don't know. But do we really need to have the precise clock in the source? I guess the information loss during transport might be lower when the source transmits signal with the known jitter, i.e. same as is in DAC. The jitter on the transport would be there, but then it would be eliminated in the ASRC.
In other words I think it might improve quality of data transport, not the timing. |
|
|
|
#34 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Miero, it is an interesting idea. One cool thing is that even if the PLL or clock generator had some error, it would be an error that would be in synch with the master clock... And since at the DAC the incoming signal would be resynced to the original master clock... Well the results could be interesting.
Here is the cool thing. if one wanted to they could do it, by using the UFL connector on the B-III SE as an output, instead of an input. Then you have something to feed a PLL/Clock generatorDon't let anyone discourage you from trying it if you have the motivation.
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio. |
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
In this case is paramount to have a very good phase noise clock in DAC and source as well. Clock must be close to the DAC and divided accordingly with the source needs. |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rock Ridge
|
The conversation is drifting into a generalized discussion on DAC clocking methodology, which would be better discussed elsewhere on the forums...
__________________
Twisted Pear Audio |
|
|
|
#37 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rock Ridge
|
Had some time for building. Here is the Buffalo-IIIse with optional u.fl connectors.
The connector for EXT_MCK will be pre-installed standard. The u.fl connectors for I2S and S/PDIF will be available as an uninstalled option (they are not that hard to solder). As usual, terminal blocks are included in the kits. The IP_S pads in the foreground control the input switching (S/PDIF or I2S) via a simple switch or digital logic.
__________________
Twisted Pear Audio |
|
|
|
#38 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Brian: The switching, will it be simlar to the 4-spdif board that you short to pads of the IP_S, and if "programmed" with external controller, what kind of command would you need to send to "switch", just a 5v(to two bits in different orders?)
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Hi Brian,
As far as I know CCHD-950 dosen't have chip enable (tristate output) option. Which XO is used in this version of Buffalo DAC? There's an option for BIII-SE without XO? Kind regards, Mihai |
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
What are Ic4, Ic5?
__________________
www.hifiduino.wordpress.com |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Buffalo III - flexibility without compromise. | Russ White | Twisted Pear | 1278 | 1st June 2013 02:12 AM |
| Buffalo III Build Thread | dheming | Twisted Pear | 8 | 7th May 2012 01:13 PM |
| Buffalo III and Integer / HOG | jtwrace | Twisted Pear | 5 | 19th January 2012 05:41 PM |
| WTB: Buffalo II/III DAC | merlin2069er | Swap Meet | 1 | 10th January 2012 05:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |