|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Twisted Pear Superior quality electronic kits |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#191 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rock Ridge
|
Quote:
__________________
Twisted Pear Audio |
|
|
|
|
#192 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
The reason then is have more flexibility. B111 is easier to configured to have 2-8 channels, is this correct?
|
|
|
|
#193 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rock Ridge
|
Partly. 1-8 channels of output, 1-8 channels of input, built in volume control (instead of needing Volumite), more configuration options in the onboard firmware and switches, easier remote control of those options via the IO header. Of course external I2C control is still possible as well.
__________________
Twisted Pear Audio |
|
|
|
#194 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
Quote:
__________________
diyAudio, doing it as big as you can, JUST BECAUSE WE CAN! |
|
|
|
|
#195 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
|
May we know which switches/configuration options were chosen?
|
|
|
|
#196 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#197 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
That what the point I was missing, thanks!
__________________
diyAudio, doing it as big as you can, JUST BECAUSE WE CAN! |
|
|
|
#198 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rock Ridge
|
There will be a single S/PDIF module sometime soon. Basically a single channel of the 4-Input module (trafo, comparator, etc).
__________________
Twisted Pear Audio |
|
|
|
#199 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
If i knew there would be a single module, i would have probably waited out for that, instead of paying more for the multi-input (which i don't need) |
|
|
|
|
#200 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
|
Available time is likely the reason. Plus the 4:1 module is a good replacement for those in need of a Mux (which incidently also is undergoing a full overhaul) for their Buffalo. And I think the 4:1 is relatively cheaper than a single input version (as in the price per port is lower).
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Legato or IVY III outputs for Buffalo II? | natzev_i | Twisted Pear | 272 | 21st March 2011 08:08 PM |
| Buffalo Dac original vs Buffalo II | mrtakib | Digital Line Level | 7 | 24th August 2010 06:47 AM |
| How much compromise, small EQ'ed sub | audiobomber | Subwoofers | 10 | 15th March 2007 09:46 PM |
| Considering a compromise | mashaffer | Full Range | 7 | 14th May 2006 11:45 PM |
| OB subs: Best compromise? | MtnBob | Subwoofers | 13 | 26th May 2004 02:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |