Buffalo III - flexibility without compromise. - Page 11 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Manufacturers > Twisted Pear

Twisted Pear Superior quality electronic kits

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th July 2011, 03:30 PM   #101
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
thanks everyone, one more thing i would like to ask,can i use placid shunt regulated power supply with buffalo III without trident?.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2011, 04:29 PM   #102
jcarr is offline jcarr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
I would like to request a straightforward means to adjust the quantizer registers (bit depth).

Thanks for allowing your users to get involved!
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2011, 06:01 PM   #103
LeonvB is offline LeonvB  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
Quote:
can i use placid shunt regulated power supply with buffalo III without trident
Only if you use other 3.3V and 1.2V regulators.

Quote:
I would like to request a straightforward means to adjust the quantizer registers (bit depth).
Isn't that what switch 1 and 2 do?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2011, 06:18 PM   #104
jcarr is offline jcarr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
>Isn't that what switch 1 and 2 do?

If modulator means the same thing as quantizer?

Normally when I see the word "modulator", I think of SMPSs and PWM, PDM, PFM or other schemes for improving efficiency / linearity.

Thanks for clarifying any semantic issues!
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2011, 07:21 PM   #105
diyAudio Member
 
Russ White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Send a message via Yahoo to Russ White
That was just semantic slip on my part. I meant quantizier.
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2011, 12:34 AM   #106
jcarr is offline jcarr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Thank you, Russ!

Request for redundant feature retracted (^o^).
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2011, 09:45 AM   #107
atoluma is offline atoluma  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
[QUOTE=
4) turning of jitter eliminator
Russ[/QUOTE]

+1
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2011, 05:08 PM   #108
jgazal is offline jgazal  Brazil
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ White View Post
(...)
One other very cool feature of B-III are the jumpers which are located on the bottom on the board. They are used to connect digital or analog nets togther. Want a Stereo DAC? Ok no problem. Mono? OK 4 - channel? easy! Even 6, 1, and for the totally crazy - 1 channel with each output in exactly the same phase. All of those are possible.

So let the fun begin! Well soon anyway...
Does that mean two Buffalo III can be used in mono with only one Legato 3?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2011, 09:19 PM   #109
glt is offline glt  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by atoluma View Post
+1
The jitter reduction switch doesn't quite make sense:

Using the DAC in normal mode, that is with a local clock, results in the samples being asynchronously converted and thus the jitter reduction comes from that conversion. So there is no way to turn it off because you cannot turn off the local clock.

Conversely, if you use the DAC synchronously, that is not using the local clock but feeding the appropriate clock that is generated with the data, then you cannot turn on jitter rejection because there is no ASRC.

So it seems that the switch does not do anything...
__________________
www.hifiduino.wordpress.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2011, 03:54 AM   #110
angcl is offline angcl  Singapore
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ White View Post
That was just semantic slip on my part. I meant quantizier.
When can i order this DAC ? show mid of July 2011 in the website .

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legato or IVY III outputs for Buffalo II? natzev_i Twisted Pear 272 21st March 2011 08:08 PM
Buffalo Dac original vs Buffalo II mrtakib Digital Line Level 7 24th August 2010 06:47 AM
How much compromise, small EQ'ed sub audiobomber Subwoofers 10 15th March 2007 09:46 PM
Considering a compromise mashaffer Full Range 7 14th May 2006 11:45 PM
OB subs: Best compromise? MtnBob Subwoofers 13 26th May 2004 02:19 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2