|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Twisted Pear Superior quality electronic kits |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Formerly Thanh1973
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
I am seriously considering purchasing a buffalo II dac, but if I do, I don't want to leave out anything.
First off I should say I am intending on using the I2S connection. Basically I am looking at to two buffalo dac's and two legato boards. What is the maximum number of placid regulators that can be used with these boards. I read somewhere in one of the manuals that you can use between 1 and 3 regulators per dac board. Any further info about that would be appreciated. I will probably be putting the raw supply in a separate case and the shunt regulators in the second case with the dac's and legato boards. What would you guys purchase and how would you connect it all together to make the most extreme buffalo with stock parts. At this point in time I am not interested in doing mods unless they have been recommended by Russ. Later when I am familiar with the stock sound I will consider modding. Any help or advice would be appreciated.
__________________
"No, this sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need." |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
|
You can only use one Placid for the DAC board. You can however add 3 Trident regulators to each board. For the Legato, you can add 3 BP Placids. But somehow I doubt it'll give you much improvement over just one.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Formerly Thanh1973
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Thanks for the reply.
Has anyone tried multiple regulators on these boards?
__________________
"No, this sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need." |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
|
The Trident regulators can be ordered starting today. They've not yet been shipped. I just ordered 2 sets for my dual mono DAC, so I'll propably be one of the first doing dual mono with a full regulator set.
My current list is: 2x BII DAC board 2x Placid 2x IVY 3 2x Placid BP 1x Mux unit 1x Toslink 1x Volumite 2x Ballsie (one for left & right) 2x R Core transformer 9V 30VA (one for left & right) 2x R Core transformer 15V 30VA On it's way is 2x Trident combo set for BII One could add a third Placid & 9V R-Core to fully separate the I/O modules like the Mux & Toslink from either channel, but this really is already pretty over the top as it is. The performance is really very good though: it simply amazes listeners a DAC can make such a difference. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Formerly Thanh1973
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Can you tell me more about the trident regulators?
__________________
"No, this sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need." |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Last edited by johnYks; 19th November 2010 at 06:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Formerly Thanh1973
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Thank you
The only other thing I would ask about, is what are the benefits of using r-cored transformers over toroidal? Do theses benefits make an audible differece?
__________________
"No, this sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need." |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
split bobbin windings give more leakage so need more air space or shielding but reduce coupling of line noise vs toroids with layered windings
split bobbin xfmr can have 5-10x less pri-sec parasitic coupling capacitance I would use EI core split bobbin "international" double insulated line xfmr |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
|
Quote:
- Lower profile and smaller size (IMO mainly when compared to EI, Torroid is often smaller due to the higher core utilisation). - Lower stray EM field from the round cross-sectional area and the balanced windings on either side. - Lower core losses from no cuts the in core and minimized distance between the core and the windings. (again mainly compared to the EI) - Lower temperature rise and noise from the round cross-sectional area and tappered slitting. For me, the cost of getting them along the rest of the kit from the US was higher than getting shielded R-Cores shipped from France. Of course a nice shielded & potted torroid is also a good idea, but compared to those the shielded R-Core is much cheaper. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SINGAPORE
|
with the installation of the Trident combo for Buffalo II, the AVCC shunt regulation will have to be removed? ie. one of the Tridents will supersede the original AVCC shunt small board?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Buffalo II | Russ White | Twisted Pear | 1772 | 26th May 2012 10:00 PM |
| Buffalo II DAC | pieter t | Swap Meet | 15 | 1st December 2010 10:43 PM |
| Buffalo II f.s. | Jeffrey Davison | Swap Meet | 2 | 10th November 2010 08:19 PM |
| Buffalo Dac original vs Buffalo II | mrtakib | Digital Line Level | 7 | 24th August 2010 06:47 AM |
| Volumite for Buffalo II? | markusA | Digital Line Level | 15 | 8th April 2010 02:51 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11267 seconds (79.96% PHP - 20.04% MySQL) with 10 queries |