|
|
#101 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rock Ridge
|
Quote:
A couple things I want to mention though. The new IVY (IVYII) is really a mono design, so the implementation on the Buf32s is really two IVYs, so a more accurate apple to apple comparison would be Buffalo + IVY + IVY (part count wise). Also, you can't see it from the picture, but there are a lot of parts on the bottom of the board. The original Buffalo had a single cap. This makes building the boards a lot more tricky, so we will likely send them out to be assembled. An estimate of this cost is included in the posted pricing, but again, will likely change a bit.
__________________
Twisted Pear Audio |
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Israel
|
Russ and Brian,
I'm, for one, into top sound quality more than counting $$$. I have a hunch that you aren't going to get rich out of Twisted Pear … |
|
|
|
|
#103 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Quote:
Having A/B compared the Sabre-24 and the Sabre-32 prototype boards at ESS Hq, the S-32 experience is special. The sound of the S-32 has a warmth and smoothness over the S-24. Even compared to the Macintosh Sabre CD player ($6,000 USD) , the S-32 sound was superior. From the care in choosing components that Russ has made, I would expect the Buffalo-32 to sound better than the ESS prototype. I just amortize the cost of the B-32 over the years of enjoyment that I'll receive from listening to it, and to me the cost is worth it. Maybe that's screwball, but the S-32 sounds wonderful and I am waiting with bated breath for the B-32 to go on sale. RossG |
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
In comparison, OPUS DAC = receiver, metro, dac and ivy =$310, so there is a 50% premium for better DAC and components...
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: sydney
|
Russ and Brien
Why an inbuilt I/V? How hard is it to use your "roll your own I/V" and hack it in? allan
__________________
Indecision makes the world gone round. Maybe |
|
|
|
|
#106 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I will leave it at that. Yes, its not a small thing. And yes. Some people told me so. And to you all I say thank you. Cheers! Russ
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio. |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Quote:
Asking out of pure personal curiosity, rather than any desire or need...... Is it possible to just add some through hole or surface mount pads to tap into the analogue signal right out of the DAC? Or does even that cause a decrease in performance? |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Well by virtue of the next stage(since its almost nil impedance) what your would get would be close to 0VAC unless you removed the I/V stage. ![]() So it would take something like what we had in the first Buffalo which is what the "Tweaker Board" will be. But don't expect the same kind of Dynamic range as can be done on a single board, as it is simply not possible. Though a big part of me wishes it were... Cheers! Russ
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio. |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
No worries!
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DK
|
Quote:
Great job Russ and Brian. I'm waiting for the "out of stock" to change.
__________________
/avr300 |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14319 seconds (77.75% PHP - 22.25% MySQL) with 11 queries |