|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Maybe it is only my perception, but why is it not more common to see dual triodes split up such that each section is part of a separate stereo channel? Of course I have seen examples where it has been done, but I have seen more examples of designs, for example, where the 2nd triode has been used as a CF in the same channel, even if poorly suited for that task. Is it a practical issue where the wiring can get more cluttered, amp cannot be built as a monoblock, etc., or is there a strong technical reason such as resulting in poor channel separation, as an example?
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
|
Channel separation may be degraded, the two section can interact electrically. Often twin tubes are used such that this interaction is harmless. Some twin tubes, such as the 6n1p have an internal screen to prevent it.
__________________
Be sure your foil hat has a good low impedance ground. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Heh, I've seen a few amps so carefully designed for channel seperation (seperate boards, even seperate supplies), then switch inputs through a $1 wafer rotary.... making a 130dB seperation design into a 30dB one with the crummy switch
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
|
Quote:
Simon |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
Quote:
Sheldon |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Quote:
You bet! Bottom line - the tubes I believe are the *least* of the channel seperation worries |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Superstition. There's little reason not to share a twin triode across channels.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
Quote:
agree 158% sometimes even best way.........especially with SRPP or Mu or whatever called thingies
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; BAF Forum & Gallery;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
capacitive cross-coupling...... it isn't so much a problem if tube shields are used, but then nobody would see the orange glow of the filaments from the front of the amp.....
under the socket, you will occasionally see a grounded shield across the tube socket as well... reduces crosstalk and interstage coupling....
__________________
Vintage Audio and Pro-Audio repair ampz(removethis)@sohonet.net spammer trap: http://www1284177414881.v-dc.net/ |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to bias DH dual triodes? | leadbelly | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 24th February 2009 11:12 AM |
| triple triode common cathode - only want to use 2 triodes | audiowize | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 10th September 2008 11:16 PM |
| Looking for dual power triodes. | Shoog | Tubes / Valves | 26 | 21st December 2006 07:19 AM |
| Substituting dual triodes | Carlp | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 10th June 2006 11:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10343 seconds (76.66% PHP - 23.34% MySQL) with 10 queries |