|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Hi,
Which 6L6-GC is better, the General Electric's or the Toshiba's? Thanx |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
That's an interesting question, I noticed too that in the "latter" tube days, some Japanese versions were made. I have a Japanese 5U4GB. Did they have good technology and were the filaments/cathodes made with an excellent quality alloy, as were the US NOS's?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Hi,
I think that GE's are the origin of 6L6's but when I was comparing the tubes, the Toshiba looked neeter. The glass was more clear and the sase looked cleaner thats why I posted this question. The Toshiba has more magnesium. I know that external looks does not tell the quality of the tube, but isnt it an indication?? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Regardless of the appearance of these two sets of tubes, it is fairly likely that the GE will be the better sounding of the two. I've had both and while well made the Toshiba ones seemed somewhat shrill and lacking in low end in a pair of McIntosh MC30s I used to own.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| General inquiries | manwhore | Subwoofers | 5 | 21st February 2007 10:11 PM |
| 2 general sub questions, please | Misa A. | Multi-Way | 3 | 22nd March 2004 05:54 AM |
| General Amp Question | RobPhill33 | Solid State | 8 | 21st January 2003 02:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06415 seconds (78.22% PHP - 21.78% MySQL) with 10 queries |