split push-pull output stage - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st March 2007, 05:42 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
andrew_whitham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Default split push-pull output stage

Hi all,

Just about to buy the output transformers when I had an idea....

take a look at the attached output stage, any comments would be very appreciated. OPT's are a *bit* expensive to buy and try.

Basically the Idea is to split the B+ windings where they are normally connected in the transformer. This then allows separate control of the B+voltage in each half of the output stage.

and if thats then controlled with reference to some fixed voltage and a sensing resistor you can tweak the voltages so that the current balances in each half

Should work in a similar way to SY and Brian Becks modulated B+ in the Unity gain stage thread(s)

maybe.

I'm a bit unsure but if it works then this might also avoid amplifying the noise voltages present with a more normal servo bias system.

Also does bringing the windings out in this way affect the performance of the transformer, when compared to the normal way?

or should I just go buy the standard part?

Andy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg balanced.jpg (39.7 KB, 382 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 06:19 AM   #2
BudP is offline BudP  United States
diyAudio Member
 
BudP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: upper left crust, united snakes
Transformers are basically a summing device, what ever you do to them will work, or it won't. Your idea will work and you will reap some benefit from what you suggest.

Most OPT's will tolerate up to 10ma DC offset and some amplifier designers actually use this to flatten the permeability curve in the core, which flattens the distortion curve for frequencies under 400 Hz, with commercial core materials. Same applies to Nickel and amorphous core but it gets more difficult to implement and vastly more costly. Expect to pay around $130 US each for really first class PP iron with a commercial core.

Bud
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 09:53 AM   #3
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
hmmm... if you do that i think you end up with what is essentially a parallel single-ended amp insteadd of a push-pull amp.... the common primary is part of how push-pull works.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 11:05 AM   #4
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
In essence, you do have a common primary since they're on the same core. DC currents cancel, and from the standpoint of AC, the windings are connected together at a virtual center tap (at the ends of each winding)- the B+ is an AC ground. So this isn't parallel, it really still is push-pull.
__________________
You might be screaming "No, no, no" and all they hear is "Who wants cake?" Let me tell you something: They all do. They all want cake.- Wilford Brimley
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 03:36 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
andrew_whitham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Well I thought so, the Magnetic field still works the same? so far as the iron is concerned the wires are still connected - this is a question...

So the important thing is now - do I stuff up the transformer if I ask for this as a custom design (pennies permitting) as with all DIY there's the possibility that I might end up joining the windings anyway and doing the normal thing... I would like to try it though.

Incidentally, although I havent contacted Sowter yet I WILL use their trafo's on this amp, something like the U070, but with this winding if I can arrange it. Or specifically unless there are good reasons not to. i.e if I bottle it and go all conventional. Or it costs more than the national debt of a small country

In fairness, this amp has so much sand in it at the moment I'm hoping Virginie Ledoyen turns up (the actress from 'the beach' y'see)

Andy
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 04:04 PM   #6
cerrem is offline cerrem  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Most if not all transformers have two wire feed for the primary..
The two primary sections (Start of one, Finish of other) are brought out and soldered to one single lead wire for Center-Tap...
If you peel back the outer paper wrap, you will see this...seperate the flying leads and resolder a separate lead wire for the othe primary half...and your good to go..
DC offset does not flaten the permeablity curve.... A gap will do that, so that the inductance is flatter over wider operating range..
Your effective permeabilty, thus inductance, will go down but your flux density headroom will increase a bit...

Chris
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 04:14 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Brian Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Florida, USA
This is an interesting design idea that I haven’t seen before. Has anyone seen this before? Of course, it is in fact push-pull as SY points out. If I understand your concept correctly, you’re adjusting and balancing the plate currents by slowly varying the plate voltages using the cathode resistor to sense currents (they could be very small resistors). By “slowly” I assume you intended your servo to be an integrator with a feedback cap. The usual servo would change grid voltage to keep cathode current at a set point. I suppose changing plate voltage would work too, although with less sensitivity. I’m not sure of the advantage. Can you explain? Still, it’s nice to see something new ( to me anyway)…
__________________
Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 04:15 PM   #8
BudP is offline BudP  United States
diyAudio Member
 
BudP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: upper left crust, united snakes
A common misconception about transformers is that the core is useful and does work. What is really going on is that the ferrous bit has formed a bounding box and the EMF emitted by the driver wires passing through that box is being reduced from infinite in size to a few cubic CM. This is essentially an antenna event.

The wires actually drive each other, they also charge the ferrous material, but that is both incidental and detrimental to their real purpose, to create a linear mag field and transform energy from one wire to another. The core influences events due to it's permitivity, essentially how fast a mag field layer, one for each core sheave in a stack, can be created within the inner perimeter of that sheave or laminations window.

How the coil is constructed, how much of the "capacitance" couples across a dielectric barrier from one charged wire to an uncharged wire and how much does not, how much of the cubic bounding box volume will support coherent, field event layers, and how fast the core will accept and release those field events are what determines how accurate a transformation occurs. This core release event is called remanence and is the period of time that the field event is being maintained by the ferrous sheave, by that ferrous bit remaining a pseudo permanent magnet and holding on to it's polarization into a bipolar magnetic event.

When you have two driving wires, they will couple to a driven wire and both will influence the eventual "signal" that driven wire exhibits. If one driver has less coherent coupling, either in flux generated B Field or static moment generated E Field / D Field events, you will have a distorted summation of the two driven "signals", but, it will still be a summation.

When you introduce other signal operants to the driver coils, they will have a modifying effect upon the ability of the wires to perform their antenna event and the likely hood of you predicting what you will think of that modification is ZERO. So, just try it.

Be prepared to use signal modifying components of differing materials and construction and take notes and post your findings please, as the rest of us would rather you did this, so we do not have to. Not that we could duplicate your scenario in a thousand years of trying, but your information will provide hints and be welcome for that.

Bud
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 04:25 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Brian Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Florida, USA
Wheeww. That’s more than I can handle! Maybe you’re making all this too hard. I think the important thing is that once these servos converge, the “DC” current through one primary winding is forced to be exactly the same as the “DC” current through the other primary winding. If the two windings have the same number of turns and balanced DCR values, then the “DC” voltage drop across each winding will be identical too. If they don’t have balanced DCRs, then there will be a slight voltage imbalance, the same as in regularly configured OPTs – but it doesn’t matter since it’s the amp-turns that count – and that is balanced by the servos. Then, it’s up to AC signal (which the servo is insensitive to) to make the usual flux changes needed to pass the signal through the OPT. I don’t see a fundamental problem here.
__________________
Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 04:33 PM   #10
cerrem is offline cerrem  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Modulating the plate voltage, by servo, in order to aquire DC balance??? Is that what this is about???
For pentodes this will require a MASSIVE plate change...big enough to distrupt the puch-pull operation and changing the headroom....lack of symmetry ... The rail voltage nees to be locked in and the same for halves of Push-Pull....
For pentodes i have used adjustments on the screen voltage to balance the DC currents.... DC current drift is slow in tubes, therefore you can use a very slow time constant in the servo control loop...
If your dealing with TRIODES, then you would adjust/control the heater supply to control the DC plate current balance... the thermal time constant of the heater wires is plenty longer than the DC current offset drift time...
Personally I would not want an active servo control loop on at all times...even with a time constant way lower than a Hz....
Tubes don't drift around that quickly, if they do then you should consider better tubes... A servo that is in sleep mode need only turn on once per hour for example for a brief moment to re-calibrate the balance..then go back into sleep mode....

Chris
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Push-Pull Output Stage MOSFET Tester lineup Solid State 2 10th September 2008 11:00 PM
series connection of filament in push pull output stage nhuwar Tubes / Valves 42 10th February 2007 06:27 PM
6BQ5 as a Push Pull Output Stage. ppl Tubes / Valves 7 23rd December 2004 09:32 PM
Push Pull Output Stage Question 316a Tubes / Valves 4 10th February 2003 01:04 AM
unity gain push pull output stage ergo Solid State 11 6th January 2003 10:32 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2