Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th March 2007, 11:11 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alabama
Default Parafeed 6em7 with 2K load?

Wondering if anyone has tried the second stage of this tube with a load closer to its Rp. All schemos I can find on the web load it with a 5K transformer, yet Rp is 900 ohms. That section could easily handle a less extreme turns ratio for more power. I've got some unused Specos 70v matching transformers that can wired for 2K load. Any suggestions for whether the effort would be worth it or not? Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2007, 05:59 AM   #2
mach1 is offline mach1  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
mach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Brisvegas
Quote:
All schemos I can find on the web load it with a 5K transformer, yet Rp is 900 ohms
Check out the plate curves on a 2A3, then look at the 6EM7. The 2A3 curves are pretty reasonably spaced over a wide voltage range. The 6EM7 curves start bunching together as you increase voltage, indicating potential asymmetry along the loadline, which = distortion.

Using a high impedance opt (flatter loadline) helps keep your loadline out of the worst area of bunching. Some people also run the 2A3 and 300B at 5k to minimise this effect.

Another way to minimise the effect of bunching is to run your tube at low voltage and high current - but in the case of the 6EM7 this is not really practical as you will lose too much power running much below 150Vp-k.

In short, 2k way too low if you want reasoable fidelity. The web schemas have got it about right.

Great sounding tube btw.
__________________
Au rutti wop-bop-a-loom-bop-a-boom-bam-boom - Richard Penniman
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2007, 08:41 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
I can backup mach1's explanation with practise. Great tube, but be reasonably light on it. 5-5.5K I found optimal both sonically and on the scope.

Cheers!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6EM7 Amp jaymanaa Tubes / Valves 12 24th July 2008 03:01 AM
yet another 6em7 amp rman Tubes / Valves 6 17th October 2007 01:26 PM
to parafeed or not to parafeed that is the question nhuwar Tubes / Valves 63 28th February 2007 12:29 PM
Parafeed with resistive load mashaffer Tubes / Valves 9 16th September 2005 07:19 PM
SE 6EM7 amp AKSA Tubes / Valves 7 17th November 2003 12:09 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Page generated in 0.08007 seconds (70.66% PHP - 29.34% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio