|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
One other thing I didn't note before (and should have). The noise is present from switch on - and doesn't get any worse (or less) when the valves warm up. In other words, it must be some ground loop hum or similar from the supply I guess?..
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Quote:
Now each valve draws 41mA and your heaters are averaging 6.3VAC. Heat is normal and bias too. Super!Quote:
But we can try ideas one after another. Just do that with the resistor for now so we see what it does. P.S. As you practically saw, such cheap amps look good but they are not only using 3rd class components but they can be so badly cathode heated and biased out of spec that they can enter fire hazard zone. Having a strong ground loop in a finished commercial product is childish at least. The chosen circuit is not bad at all though, and you can benefit from Auricaps, =C= 6L6GC output valves, and a small PSU choke if you can fit it. But small chokes have a lot of resistance and if common for channels it will eat much B+. Another idea is to use an extra 100uF 450V cap before the 470uF that is already there, and link them with a 10R 10W. CRC will cut somehow on your PSU ripple, and you will lose just 10V B+. A no space for 2 good chokes situation can benefit somehow from the CRC alternative suggestion. Appreciably better than the single cap you have there now. |
||
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Here is what the simulator shows for your single 470uF / 450V cap.
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
And here is what it shows for the 100uF - 10R - 470uF CRC. Notice the leaner horizontal line. A good reduction for ripple given the tight space that may not allow for chokes. Economic and straightforward too.
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Right, after some fiddling with the grounds I discovered that most of the noise is coming from the input select and volume module. When this is disconnected from earth - it pretty much shuts up. You can see in the picture that there is (was) a wire soldered to this module and screwed to the chassis, but it is also earthed through the bodies of the switch and pot where they physically touch the chassis.
If you look at the scope pic with the earth connected: ...and without: ..you'll see the difference. There is still some noise (as shown in the pic!) but a LOT less. I think I'll try it like this for a while and consider the other mods as a next step. Overall it really doens't sound bad and now runs much cooler. It's interesting that the manufacturers specifically earthed this if it creates this problem. Thanks for all the help! |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Bravo Dan! They have created a loop within the GND circuit and you have broken it. If you try breaking with a resistor in other places like the one I mentioned earlier, you may probably kill hum even more. But you don't run extra sensitive speakers so maybe its futile. I am happy that we did a fruitful step by step problem solving with no back and forth. Well worthed the effort.
Regards Salas. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
The big problem now is isolating the thing. Unfortunately the body of the input switcher is grounded and as the chassis is metal it's hard to get it rights. Is there not any way of resolving these things without breaking the connection to earth? Can you not 'equalise' the gnds so no loops occur?
Thanks, Dan |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Another thing regarding the current we adjusted by lifting one of the 500ohm resistors... according to this data sheet, we are safe with 88ma, didn't I only have 70 or so per tube in the first place?
http://www.retrovox.com.au/tsol5881.pdf Thanks, Dan |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
1. Yes, to 'equalize' the GND currents is what a competent layout in any commercial amp should have done in the first place. See about that 10R break suggestion I have proposed earlier.
2. That data sheet says 'values are for two tubes'. Was overheated, wasn't it? Each tube was at max dissipation before. Devouring itself. |
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Quote:
Quote:
Dan |
||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Yaqin mc10L | gasman | Tubes / Valves | 247 | 11th June 2013 02:00 AM |
| Yaqin MC10K | ramallo | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 22nd January 2009 04:42 PM |
| Yaqin MC-10L | cruzrman | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 23rd July 2008 02:37 AM |
| Yaqin Valve Amplifier UK Sales & Service | marktravuk | Vendor's Bazaar | 3 | 16th November 2007 04:55 AM |
| yaqin mc10k | inquisitive | Tubes / Valves | 33 | 8th October 2007 12:56 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |