|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi John,
Now it's my time not to understand why refer to the other thread? SY, Quote:
but a chacun son gout or chacun a son gout.(the former not being the same as the latter). Ciao,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
dhaen:
Well, yeah, if you want an amp to have a "sound," I can see the point. 2ndHD is appealling to many listeners. But Joel has said that his goal is an amp that is sonically transparent. So, I'm still somewhat mystified as to why, with this design goal, one would start with a topology which is prone to large amounts of distortion, even order or otherwise. PP will have a considerably lower amount of THD and IM (I find the argument that an amp with 3% 2ndHD and 1% 3rdHD should be thought of as "better" than an amp with 0.05% THD completely baffling). Much of the complication of these circuits is meant to circumvent the high distortion one would get otherwise- the expression "polishing a turd" comes to mind. But admittedly, a lot of things in audiophilia mystify me. Why do I use tubes anyway? |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Frank, merci. My spoken French is better than my writing- the perils of never having had any formal training. The basic rule of written versus spoken French is that everything is pronounced exactly the way it sounds.
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
Frank, the reference to the thread was that having produced a balanced system that cancelled even harmonics, it "souded" better when it was unbalanced.
Sy, I'm hardly here to defend Joel. He'll want to do that himself. I do have a opinion that the "harmonic signature" has to be taken as a whole. Chopping out every other energy peak with that "comb filter" called push-pull, can give some undesirable effects. In the mean time, I'll listen to my SET. Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Quote:
Well yes... But knowing Joel wanted to build a SE OTL I pointed to the Philips SRPP circuit or IMO even better the White CF, a circuit that would really shine in this application. As you see for yourself he chose otherwise. I remedied my frustration with a Let's wait and see it may please him after all... Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Quote:
also... To Frank, and whom it may concern - it's very easy to sit back with an air of superiority and look down on other people's design "errors", while offering none of your own. I have yet to see a de grove circuit. I suspect there isn't one. In fact, none of the most critical members have posted a design of their own - that I've seen. Alert me if I'm wrong. Genuine suggestions are welcome. Idiotic jokes and condescension are not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Joel: Once I figure out how to get schematics drawn on my computer and get them into an uploadable format, I'll post some designs that I'm currently using. You'll note a pretty thorough description of my preamp design in the servo thread. I welcome your criticism.
I'm pretty good with circuits- I'm pretty bad with computers. A man has got to know his limitations. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
SY,
If you already have the schematics in electronic form, then it is possible to use a screen capture utility, then save them as jpg or gif files for posting. Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
That would be too easy- my schematics are drawn in my lab notebook. No scanner, alas. I have AutoCad capability, but no library of symbols for it. Frank sent me some bmp symbols, but figuring out how to use them properly will have to wait until I'm finished my next travel jag (starting this weekend, back at the end of this month). But my New Year's resolution was to get digital with schematics, so...
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SE 6550 class project (continued) | cadaverdog | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 12th May 2008 04:31 AM |
| 6550 SE class project (continued) | cadaverdog | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 12th May 2008 02:26 AM |
| Dipoles (continued)... | Nuuk | Multi-Way | 10 | 25th February 2006 07:52 PM |
| JP2.0 project continued | DIY_newbie | Multi-Way | 8 | 1st March 2005 08:56 PM |
| Slew Rate Limiting... continued. | Joel | Tubes / Valves | 31 | 4th February 2003 07:12 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11589 seconds (78.76% PHP - 21.24% MySQL) with 11 queries |