Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th January 2003, 09:33 PM   #21
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Default FALL BACK FOR J...

Hi John,

Now it's my time not to understand why refer to the other thread?

SY,

Quote:
but chaque un a son gout.
With your permission:

but a chacun son gout or chacun a son gout.(the former not being the same as the latter).

Ciao,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2003, 09:34 PM   #22
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
dhaen:

Well, yeah, if you want an amp to have a "sound," I can see the point. 2ndHD is appealling to many listeners. But Joel has said that his goal is an amp that is sonically transparent. So, I'm still somewhat mystified as to why, with this design goal, one would start with a topology which is prone to large amounts of distortion, even order or otherwise. PP will have a considerably lower amount of THD and IM (I find the argument that an amp with 3% 2ndHD and 1% 3rdHD should be thought of as "better" than an amp with 0.05% THD completely baffling). Much of the complication of these circuits is meant to circumvent the high distortion one would get otherwise- the expression "polishing a turd" comes to mind.

But admittedly, a lot of things in audiophilia mystify me. Why do I use tubes anyway?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2003, 09:38 PM   #23
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Frank, merci. My spoken French is better than my writing- the perils of never having had any formal training. The basic rule of written versus spoken French is that everything is pronounced exactly the way it sounds.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2003, 09:51 PM   #24
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
dhaen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
Frank, the reference to the thread was that having produced a balanced system that cancelled even harmonics, it "souded" better when it was unbalanced.

Sy, I'm hardly here to defend Joel. He'll want to do that himself.
I do have a opinion that the "harmonic signature" has to be taken as a whole. Chopping out every other energy peak with that "comb filter" called push-pull, can give some undesirable effects.

In the mean time, I'll listen to my SET.

Cheers,
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2003, 09:53 PM   #25
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Default OTL SE.

Hi,

Quote:
PP will have a considerably lower amount of THD and IM (I find the argument that an amp with 3% 2ndHD and 1% 3rdHD should be thought of as "better" than an amp with 0.05% THD completely baffling). Much of the complication of these circuits is meant to circumvent the high distortion one would get otherwise- the expression "polishing a turd" comes to mind.

Well yes...
But knowing Joel wanted to build a SE OTL I pointed to the Philips SRPP circuit or IMO even better the White CF, a circuit that would really shine in this application.

As you see for yourself he chose otherwise.

I remedied my frustration with a session and some aspirine.

Let's wait and see it may please him after all...

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2003, 01:54 PM   #26
Joel is offline Joel  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Joel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Quote:
Originally posted by SY
But admittedly, a lot of things in audiophilia mystify me. Why do I use tubes anyway?
I rest my case.

also...
To Frank, and whom it may concern - it's very easy to sit back with an air of superiority and look down on other people's design "errors", while offering none of your own.
I have yet to see a de grove circuit. I suspect there isn't one.
In fact, none of the most critical members have posted a design of their own - that I've seen. Alert me if I'm wrong.

Genuine suggestions are welcome. Idiotic jokes and condescension are not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2003, 01:56 PM   #27
Joel is offline Joel  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Joel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Quote:
Originally posted by dhaen
The resistor was in series with the energy being recovered from the choke; low efficiency.
Ok John, phew! I thought for a minute there that there was some crazy law of induction I wasn't aware of!
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2003, 03:10 PM   #28
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Joel: Once I figure out how to get schematics drawn on my computer and get them into an uploadable format, I'll post some designs that I'm currently using. You'll note a pretty thorough description of my preamp design in the servo thread. I welcome your criticism.

I'm pretty good with circuits- I'm pretty bad with computers. A man has got to know his limitations.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2003, 04:20 PM   #29
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
dhaen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
SY,

If you already have the schematics in electronic form, then it is possible to use a screen capture utility, then save them as jpg or gif files for posting.

Cheers,
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2003, 04:25 PM   #30
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
That would be too easy- my schematics are drawn in my lab notebook. No scanner, alas. I have AutoCad capability, but no library of symbols for it. Frank sent me some bmp symbols, but figuring out how to use them properly will have to wait until I'm finished my next travel jag (starting this weekend, back at the end of this month). But my New Year's resolution was to get digital with schematics, so...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SE 6550 class project (continued) cadaverdog Tubes / Valves 11 12th May 2008 04:31 AM
6550 SE class project (continued) cadaverdog Tubes / Valves 9 12th May 2008 02:26 AM
Dipoles (continued)... Nuuk Multi-Way 10 25th February 2006 07:52 PM
JP2.0 project continued DIY_newbie Multi-Way 8 1st March 2005 08:56 PM
Slew Rate Limiting... continued. Joel Tubes / Valves 31 4th February 2003 07:12 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Page generated in 0.11589 seconds (78.76% PHP - 21.24% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio