|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Is there a good rule of thumb for determining the optimal relationship of an output transformer's primary impedance to plate resistance in a push-pull circuit?
And, if you connect an 8 ohm load to a 4 ohm secondary, do you get the same doubling of the primary as with a single ended transformer, or is there a different relationship? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Reflected impedances work the same way, p-p or SE. Double the secondary load, you'll double the primary impedance.
There are lots of rules of thumb for choosing p-p impedance, none any good. Datasheets, rulers, and pencils are still the best way.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
I would totally agree with SY and second what he says....
There are "rules of thumb" but they are really not usefull unless you were stranded on a deserted island trying to make a radio from scrap parts laying around..Now if you were deserted with 10 georgous hot women, then you make sure to NOT get the radio to work One common misunderstanding i hear alot... Is that a partiuclar plate load goes with a particular tube type.... A good plate load depends heavily on the operating conditions of the tube...There is what is refered to "optimum plate load" ...... Arriving at this requires reviewing the plate curves and fitting a load-line to get the best power output for the best linearity..... One rooky mistake i see all the time with deriving plate loads..is using the wrong plate curves with pentodes/beam tubes... You need to make sure you are using the curves for the correct SCREEN VOLTAGE....It is not uncommon to see mostly 250V for the screen voltage in many data sheets..... The other big mistake is using idle voltages to derive the plate load.... For example you have an amp with 490V on the plates and 485V on the screens when idleing... When the amp is turned up to max clean sine-wave signal output, say 100W, the Plate voltage may be at 430V and the screen volts may be at 400V... That is the target voltage you design to..... The power supply in most amps is not regulated, so plan on designing with the voltages and full power output....then assume the voltage will raise above these values at idle, which is really not of much concern at idle.... Chris |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
|
Of course, we also have to take into account the heavyest influence of all, regarding operating point - class A or (A)B. The first instance has each tube 'see each other's plate' the secind does not... difference in plate-to-plate impedance is 2x!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: michigan
|
Agree with what you guy's are saying (to a point) but doesn't the tube
it'self and it's plate resistance have a large factor in determining the load? Take an el84 or a 6v6, most if not all trafos used are in the 8k to 10K range with wildly different operating points. Most KT88 amps are in the 4k to 5k range and 6l6's are generally built around 6600 outputs. If it was only operating point that determined it why the usual suspect load trafos associated with these tubes? Not questioning here, just want to learn the reasons if you would. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
You can get too hung up on determining optimum anode loads, but for triodes you won't usually be too far away from twice ra at the operating point. For pentodes you definitely have to resort to curves, ruler, and pencil. Remember that the output transformer simply reflects what it sees on the secondary, so unless you have loudspeakers that are pure resistances (very rare) your anode load varies by a factor of two over the audio range anyway.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
|
Quote:
Yves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London Hammersmith
|
Hello,
My opinion is... efficiency. Many different tubes can drive same load, i.e. same OT with sampe load. But this not imply any of them lead to full maximum efficiency. An 807 PP can drive barely a 10,000 Ohm anode to anode load in class AB1. A KT88 can drive, in the same circuit a 4,000 Ohm anode to anode load. A KT88 can drive 10,000 Ohm load same as 807. So, what makes the difference? Efficiency, as to say more power at the same distortion level per power consumed. A KT88 driving a load of 4KOhm offers greater amplification becouse of less transformer difficulties. Regards. Larry.
__________________
Nothing happens by itself, you have to work hard to arrange things to make it happen. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Many of the recomended plate loads in tube manuals are completely off the mark... Must have hired interns to do some of that stuff...
The 6.6K you commonly see with 6L6 tubes refers to Ultra-Linear connection...at a specific operating condition.... Here is a image to setting up a Class AB1 KT66 Push-Pull load line for 400V screen and 410V on the plate.... i goofed on one number in there but it's very close.... You want the load-line to extend only up to the 0-bias curve becuase not interested in going Class AB2..... You want to stay in the saturation region of the curves in order to maintain the plate resistance as much as possible, very important for frequency response...if you make the load line to steep then you loose voltage swing and you spend too much averaged time per cycle over the MAX plate dissipation and the tube could red-plate.... If you make the plate load to big then you intercept the 0-bias curve when it is in TRIODE region, which reduces your current swing as well as causes the tube to clip sooner, you also draw excessive screen current and the plate resistance drops down very low to where the tube behaves like a triode....now this low plate resistance will completly alter the frequency response...... The key thing with this curves is that they are for 400V screen voltage.....if you are using a different screen voltage then you need a totally different set of curves, which will produce different end results.... Chris |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: michigan
|
I hear what some are saying but it looked to the general public until I
posted that only the voltage and or current were responsable for load and the plate resistance of the tube it'self had no factor in it. If you ran a 6V6, 6L6, KT88 all in UL at the same plate voltage, current then we'd have different optimal loads correct? One determining factor would be the plate resistance of the tube it'self? And the load would go from high to low starting with 6V6 then 6L6 onto KT88 and at least partially because of there plate resistance? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12499 seconds (86.86% PHP - 13.14% MySQL) with 11 queries |